Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If he puts two diodes in parallel he will double the capacitance and
will have to reduce the amount of inductance to have the same min. frequency. Im not sure that the high end won't be greater than before, even though the capacitance ratio is the same, since the fixed inductance is lower. Another idea would be to put the two varicaps in parallel, but switch one of them out as you approach the upper frequency. Kenneth, F=1/((2*PI)*SQR(L*C)) If you double C, you have to halve L to maintain the same frequency. If you do this, you only changed the LC ratio, not the delta tuning range. The only way to get more delta F is to get more delta C. If you use the switching technique, you'll have a discontinuous tuning curve (Vtune vs Freq) which makes it hard to implement a closed loop tuning system. It can be done, but the control loop gets complicated. A previous poster suggested what I'd called a "synthetic reactance", which is a series-parallel LC combination. This technique can produce very large effective-capacitance changes with a modest varactor range, however it also comes with the susceptibility of mode-jumping in the output frequency. Joe W3JDR |