LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #37   Report Post  
Old January 10th 04, 11:59 AM
Ian White, G3SEK
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bill Turner wrote:

Correct of course, but as I understand it, the only complication is
that there are harmonics present. It is still a case of add and
subtract, isn't it?

The original question only mentioned the *four* frequencies present in
the output, ignoring the harmonics.

Unless you can show me otherwise, I stand by my original observation.


The math does show otherwise.

When we talk about "square-law" and "third-order", we're actually buying
into a whole package deal of math-based concepts. Logically, the deal is
that we can't use those words *meaningfully* unless we also accept what
the math tells us, namely:

1. Each order of distortion is independent of all the other orders. It
generates its own individual package of output frequencies.

2. Frequencies that are in the same-order package *must* all be
generated together (you can't have one of them without having all the
others too).

3. Frequencies that are in different-order packages are totally separate
and unconnected.


2f1 and 2f2 are part of the package of 2nd-order products, along with
(f1 + f1) and (f1 - f2)... there are four 2nd-order output frequencies,
no more and no less.

3f1, 3f2, (2f1 + f2), (2f1 - f2), (f1 + 2f1) and (f2 - 2f1) are all part
of the 3rd-order package... there are six 3rd-order output frequencies,
no more and no less.

A perfect square-law mixer produces only 2nd-order products. 2f1 and 2f2
are present at the output, but they do not "go round again" and mix with
the input signals to produce (2f1 + f2) etc. Those 3rd-order products
arise *entirely and exclusively* from 3rd-order distortion.

That conclusion follows by strict, non-negotiable mathematical logic
from the fundamental definition of what "order of distortion" means.



As others have said, from the practical engineering point of view, the
way you envision mixing products being produced is "purely academic".
But that "purely academic" debate is exactly what we're involved in
here... so here, it makes all the difference in the world.




--
73 from Ian G3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB)
Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book'
http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
transmitter question - its a dousy duckman Homebrew 24 January 3rd 04 12:11 AM
Mixer products every 5kHz to 30MHz on DX-394? Tom Holden Homebrew 10 October 22nd 03 01:26 PM
Mixer products every 5kHz to 30MHz on DX-394? Tom Holden Homebrew 0 October 18th 03 10:34 PM
Superheterodyne LO question Liam Ness Homebrew 4 July 22nd 03 05:18 AM
Superheterodyne LO question Liam Ness Homebrew 0 July 21st 03 11:12 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017