2m Amplifier Designs
I was looking through my old 1994 ARRL Handbook at the 2m amplifier designs.
I thought the few they had there were interesting so I decided to look in the only other handbook I had (2000). I was stunned to see that there were NO VHF amplifier designs included. Even funnier, was the absence of the amplifier topic altogether in the VHF/UHF handbook-- no designs there either. where are they all hiding?!?! If anyone has some good designs on the net, please point me to them! Thanks, Jason KB5URQ |
hi jason,
Check out this site, many good amplifers from Motorola designs. http://www.communication-concepts.com/default.htm 73 jimbo Jason wrote: I was looking through my old 1994 ARRL Handbook at the 2m amplifier designs. I thought the few they had there were interesting so I decided to look in the only other handbook I had (2000). I was stunned to see that there were NO VHF amplifier designs included. Even funnier, was the absence of the amplifier topic altogether in the VHF/UHF handbook-- no designs there either. where are they all hiding?!?! If anyone has some good designs on the net, please point me to them! Thanks, Jason KB5URQ |
The 2002 book has both a 1500W linear and a 50W class C mobile amp, I was
just drooling over them last night. "Jason Dugas" wrote in message ... I was looking through my old 1994 ARRL Handbook at the 2m amplifier designs. I thought the few they had there were interesting so I decided to look in the only other handbook I had (2000). I was stunned to see that there were NO VHF amplifier designs included. Even funnier, was the absence of the amplifier topic altogether in the VHF/UHF handbook-- no designs there either. where are they all hiding?!?! If anyone has some good designs on the net, please point me to them! Thanks, Jason KB5URQ |
(Jason replied to me via email):
Hmm, guess they must have skipped a year on the topic... Does the 1.5kW linear require an external high voltage power supply? the 300W unit in 1994's handbook requires fabrication of both the amplifier & the power supply.. Jason KB5URQ It requires one, either internal or external. If you can put the RF deck together then you should be happy putting together the HV supply (may want to buy a crane for the transformer, though). -- Tim "Tim Wescott" wrote in message ... The 2002 book has both a 1500W linear and a 50W class C mobile amp, I was just drooling over them last night. "Jason Dugas" wrote in message ... I was looking through my old 1994 ARRL Handbook at the 2m amplifier designs. I thought the few they had there were interesting so I decided to look in the only other handbook I had (2000). I was stunned to see that there were NO VHF amplifier designs included. Even funnier, was the absence of the amplifier topic altogether in the VHF/UHF handbook-- no designs there either. where are they all hiding?!?! If anyone has some good designs on the net, please point me to them! Thanks, Jason KB5URQ |
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:35:11 GMT, jimbo wrote:
|hi jason, | |Check out this site, many good amplifers from Motorola designs. | |http://www.communication-concepts.com/default.htm Those aren't "amplifiers", they are "drivers." These are amplifiers: http://web.wt.net/~w5un/8877-1.htm http://www.svetlana.com/docs/TechBul...hnoteNo42.html http://www.qsl.net/dl4mea/2g35.htm http://www.qsl.net/wb5apd/144_new_amp.html etc. etc... |
Down-East Microwave also has kits for "drivers" (jeesh).
Wes: Does the sky over your shack glow at night? During the day? "Wes Stewart" wrote in message ... On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:35:11 GMT, jimbo wrote: |hi jason, | |Check out this site, many good amplifers from Motorola designs. | |http://www.communication-concepts.com/default.htm Those aren't "amplifiers", they are "drivers." These are amplifiers: http://web.wt.net/~w5un/8877-1.htm http://www.svetlana.com/docs/TechBul...hnoteNo42.html http://www.qsl.net/dl4mea/2g35.htm http://www.qsl.net/wb5apd/144_new_amp.html etc. etc... |
http://www.communication-concepts.com/hf_amplifiers.htm
Am I missing something here ??? jimbo Wes wrote: On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:35:11 GMT, jimbo wrote: |hi jason, | |Check out this site, many good amplifers from Motorola designs. | |http://www.communication-concepts.com/default.htm Those aren't "amplifiers", they are "drivers." These are amplifiers: http://web.wt.net/~w5un/8877-1.htm http://www.svetlana.com/docs/TechBul...hnoteNo42.html http://www.qsl.net/dl4mea/2g35.htm http://www.qsl.net/wb5apd/144_new_amp.html etc. etc... |
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 02:08:07 GMT, jimbo wrote:
|http://www.communication-concepts.com/hf_amplifiers.htm | |Am I missing something here ??? Yes and I tried to respond to your email message but your spoofed your return address, so forget about it. If it's over your head, so be it. |
In article , jimbo writes:
http://www.communication-concepts.com/hf_amplifiers.htm Am I missing something here ??? jimbo Communications Concepts is a company that supplies parts and whole kits for making a number of solid-state RF AMPLIFIERS, principally made according to Motorola application notes done mostly by Helge Granberg. C-C has some of those app notes available for download although the quality wasn't good when I checked them out about 3 years ago. I've heard good words about C-C but never ordered anything from them myself. Some of the old Motorola app notes still exist in downloadable form from the archives of the Motorola website...or at least existed at one time. Some of the old Motorola RF amplifier transistors are now made by ON Semiconductor but the original Motorola solid- state organizations did a rather monstrous downsizing of production to more in-demand and profitable semiconductors. Len Anderson retired (from regular hours) electronic engineer person |
Avery Fineman wrote:
In article , jimbo writes: http://www.communication-concepts.com/hf_amplifiers.htm Am I missing something here ??? jimbo Communications Concepts is a company that supplies parts and whole kits for making a number of solid-state RF AMPLIFIERS, principally made according to Motorola application notes done mostly by Helge Granberg. C-C has some of those app notes available for download although the quality wasn't good when I checked them out about 3 years ago. I've heard good words about C-C but never ordered anything from them myself. Some of the old Motorola app notes still exist in downloadable form from the archives of the Motorola website...or at least existed at one time. Some of the old Motorola RF amplifier transistors are now made by ON Semiconductor but the original Motorola solid- state organizations did a rather monstrous downsizing of production to more in-demand and profitable semiconductors. Len Anderson retired (from regular hours) electronic engineer person I tried to get an old Motorola datasheet yesterday, and the entire archive section was gone. -- We now return you to our normally scheduled programming. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
In article , "Michael A. Terrell"
writes: I tried to get an old Motorola datasheet yesterday, and the entire archive section was gone. To paraphrase the Latin - Sick transit, gloria mundi. :-( Check ON Semiconductor. They might still have some of the datasheets. Len Anderson retired (from regular hours) electronic engineer person |
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 18:01:19 -0800, "Tim Wescott"
wrote: |Down-East Microwave also has kits for "drivers" (jeesh). | |Wes: Does the sky over your shack glow at night? During the day? Not lately, my 2M EME station is in mothballs. |
Hey Jim,
How is that HRO500 doing? Pete "jimbo" wrote in message ... http://www.communication-concepts.com/hf_amplifiers.htm Am I missing something here ??? jimbo Wes wrote: On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:35:11 GMT, jimbo wrote: |hi jason, | |Check out this site, many good amplifers from Motorola designs. | |http://www.communication-concepts.com/default.htm Those aren't "amplifiers", they are "drivers." These are amplifiers: http://web.wt.net/~w5un/8877-1.htm http://www.svetlana.com/docs/TechBul...hnoteNo42.html http://www.qsl.net/dl4mea/2g35.htm http://www.qsl.net/wb5apd/144_new_amp.html etc. etc... |
hello Wes,
I will admit this is over my head if you'll admit trying to reply to a .nospam.com email address is over your head ! lol, share your info with all on usenet that is what it is for ! regards, jimbo Wes wrote: On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 02:08:07 GMT, jimbo wrote: |http://www.communication-concepts.com/hf_amplifiers.htm | |Am I missing something here ??? Yes and I tried to respond to your email message but your spoofed your return address, so forget about it. If it's over your head, so be it. |
hello Wes,
I will admit this is over my head if you'll admit trying to reply to a .nospam.com email address is over your head ! lol, share your info with all on usenet that is what it is for ! regards, jimbo Wes wrote: On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 02:08:07 GMT, jimbo wrote: |http://www.communication-concepts.com/hf_amplifiers.htm | |Am I missing something here ??? Yes and I tried to respond to your email message but your spoofed your return address, so forget about it. If it's over your head, so be it. |
hello Wes,
I will admit this is over my head if you'll admit trying to reply to a .nospam.com email address is over your head ! lol, share your info with all on usenet that is what it is for ! regards, jimbo Wes wrote: On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 02:08:07 GMT, jimbo wrote: |http://www.communication-concepts.com/hf_amplifiers.htm | |Am I missing something here ??? Yes and I tried to respond to your email message but your spoofed your return address, so forget about it. If it's over your head, so be it. |
I'll only respond to this once instead of three times.
Why would anyone send a private email to someone and not include a valid return email address? Selecting "reply" and typing a nice return message seemed like a logical thing to do. I didn't ever suppose that the idiot sending the message was just sending spam. Now I know better. I was just trying to save you the embarrassment of further public ridicule. Alas, I failed. On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 06:44:35 GMT, jimbo wrote: |hello Wes, | |I will admit this is over my head if you'll admit trying to reply to |a .nospam.com email address is over your head ! | |lol, | |share your info with all on usenet that is what it is for ! | |regards, | |jimbo | |Wes wrote: | | On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 02:08:07 GMT, jimbo wrote: | | |http://www.communication-concepts.com/hf_amplifiers.htm | | | |Am I missing something here ??? | | Yes and I tried to respond to your email message but your spoofed your | return address, so forget about it. If it's over your head, so be it. |
Hi Wes,
Not sure why it posted three times, wn has been having some trouble this week. Anyway, not everyone checks into usenet as often as regular email, so just a courtesy to reply to the group and individual. NOT SPAM. The original post inquired about vhf amplifier designs on the net, I replied with one link. You provided several links too. Good. If I should walk away a little smarter from something you or anyone else posted that is a good thing and nothing I should be embarrassed by. Have a nice day. jimbo Wes Stewart wrote: I'll only respond to this once instead of three times. Why would anyone send a private email to someone and not include a valid return email address? Selecting "reply" and typing a nice return message seemed like a logical thing to do. I didn't ever suppose that the idiot sending the message was just sending spam. Now I know better. I was just trying to save you the embarrassment of further public ridicule. Alas, I failed. On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 06:44:35 GMT, jimbo wrote: |hello Wes, | |I will admit this is over my head if you'll admit trying to reply to |a .nospam.com email address is over your head ! | |lol, | |share your info with all on usenet that is what it is for ! | |regards, | |jimbo | |Wes wrote: | | On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 02:08:07 GMT, jimbo wrote: | | |http://www.communication-concepts.com/hf_amplifiers.htm | | | |Am I missing something here ??? | | Yes and I tried to respond to your email message but your spoofed your | return address, so forget about it. If it's over your head, so be it. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:35 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com