RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Homebrew (https://www.radiobanter.com/homebrew/)
-   -   2m Amplifier Designs (https://www.radiobanter.com/homebrew/22205-2m-amplifier-designs.html)

Jason Dugas January 28th 04 12:25 AM

2m Amplifier Designs
 
I was looking through my old 1994 ARRL Handbook at the 2m amplifier designs.
I thought the few they had there were interesting so I decided to look in
the only other handbook I had (2000). I was stunned to see that there were
NO VHF amplifier designs included. Even funnier, was the absence of the
amplifier topic altogether in the VHF/UHF handbook-- no designs there
either. where are they all hiding?!?!

If anyone has some good designs on the net, please point me to them!
Thanks,

Jason
KB5URQ



jimbo January 28th 04 12:35 AM

hi jason,

Check out this site, many good amplifers from Motorola designs.

http://www.communication-concepts.com/default.htm

73 jimbo


Jason wrote:

I was looking through my old 1994 ARRL Handbook at the 2m amplifier designs.
I thought the few they had there were interesting so I decided to look in
the only other handbook I had (2000). I was stunned to see that there were
NO VHF amplifier designs included. Even funnier, was the absence of the
amplifier topic altogether in the VHF/UHF handbook-- no designs there
either. where are they all hiding?!?!

If anyone has some good designs on the net, please point me to them!
Thanks,

Jason
KB5URQ



Tim Wescott January 28th 04 12:41 AM

The 2002 book has both a 1500W linear and a 50W class C mobile amp, I was
just drooling over them last night.

"Jason Dugas" wrote in message
...
I was looking through my old 1994 ARRL Handbook at the 2m amplifier

designs.
I thought the few they had there were interesting so I decided to look in
the only other handbook I had (2000). I was stunned to see that there

were
NO VHF amplifier designs included. Even funnier, was the absence of the
amplifier topic altogether in the VHF/UHF handbook-- no designs there
either. where are they all hiding?!?!

If anyone has some good designs on the net, please point me to them!
Thanks,

Jason
KB5URQ





Tim Wescott January 28th 04 01:44 AM

(Jason replied to me via email):

Hmm, guess they must have skipped a year on the topic...
Does the 1.5kW linear require an external high voltage power supply? the
300W unit in 1994's handbook requires fabrication of both the amplifier &
the power supply..

Jason
KB5URQ

It requires one, either internal or external. If you can put the RF deck
together then you should be happy putting together the HV supply (may want
to buy a crane for the transformer, though).

-- Tim

"Tim Wescott" wrote in message
...
The 2002 book has both a 1500W linear and a 50W class C mobile amp, I was
just drooling over them last night.

"Jason Dugas" wrote in message
...
I was looking through my old 1994 ARRL Handbook at the 2m amplifier

designs.
I thought the few they had there were interesting so I decided to look

in
the only other handbook I had (2000). I was stunned to see that there

were
NO VHF amplifier designs included. Even funnier, was the absence of the
amplifier topic altogether in the VHF/UHF handbook-- no designs there
either. where are they all hiding?!?!

If anyone has some good designs on the net, please point me to them!
Thanks,

Jason
KB5URQ







Wes Stewart January 28th 04 01:51 AM

On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:35:11 GMT, jimbo wrote:

|hi jason,
|
|Check out this site, many good amplifers from Motorola designs.
|
|http://www.communication-concepts.com/default.htm

Those aren't "amplifiers", they are "drivers."

These are amplifiers:

http://web.wt.net/~w5un/8877-1.htm

http://www.svetlana.com/docs/TechBul...hnoteNo42.html

http://www.qsl.net/dl4mea/2g35.htm

http://www.qsl.net/wb5apd/144_new_amp.html

etc. etc...

Tim Wescott January 28th 04 02:01 AM

Down-East Microwave also has kits for "drivers" (jeesh).

Wes: Does the sky over your shack glow at night? During the day?

"Wes Stewart" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:35:11 GMT, jimbo wrote:

|hi jason,
|
|Check out this site, many good amplifers from Motorola designs.
|
|http://www.communication-concepts.com/default.htm

Those aren't "amplifiers", they are "drivers."

These are amplifiers:

http://web.wt.net/~w5un/8877-1.htm

http://www.svetlana.com/docs/TechBul...hnoteNo42.html

http://www.qsl.net/dl4mea/2g35.htm

http://www.qsl.net/wb5apd/144_new_amp.html

etc. etc...




jimbo January 28th 04 02:08 AM

http://www.communication-concepts.com/hf_amplifiers.htm

Am I missing something here ???

jimbo

Wes wrote:

On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:35:11 GMT, jimbo wrote:

|hi jason,
|
|Check out this site, many good amplifers from Motorola designs.
|
|http://www.communication-concepts.com/default.htm

Those aren't "amplifiers", they are "drivers."

These are amplifiers:

http://web.wt.net/~w5un/8877-1.htm

http://www.svetlana.com/docs/TechBul...hnoteNo42.html

http://www.qsl.net/dl4mea/2g35.htm

http://www.qsl.net/wb5apd/144_new_amp.html

etc. etc...



Wes Stewart January 28th 04 04:59 AM

On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 02:08:07 GMT, jimbo wrote:

|http://www.communication-concepts.com/hf_amplifiers.htm
|
|Am I missing something here ???

Yes and I tried to respond to your email message but your spoofed your
return address, so forget about it. If it's over your head, so be it.


Avery Fineman January 28th 04 05:24 AM

In article , jimbo writes:

http://www.communication-concepts.com/hf_amplifiers.htm

Am I missing something here ???

jimbo


Communications Concepts is a company that supplies parts and
whole kits for making a number of solid-state RF AMPLIFIERS,
principally made according to Motorola application notes done
mostly by Helge Granberg. C-C has some of those app notes
available for download although the quality wasn't good when I
checked them out about 3 years ago. I've heard good words about
C-C but never ordered anything from them myself.

Some of the old Motorola app notes still exist in downloadable form
from the archives of the Motorola website...or at least existed at
one time. Some of the old Motorola RF amplifier transistors are
now made by ON Semiconductor but the original Motorola solid-
state organizations did a rather monstrous downsizing of production
to more in-demand and profitable semiconductors.

Len Anderson
retired (from regular hours) electronic engineer person

Michael A. Terrell January 28th 04 05:52 AM

Avery Fineman wrote:

In article , jimbo writes:

http://www.communication-concepts.com/hf_amplifiers.htm

Am I missing something here ???

jimbo


Communications Concepts is a company that supplies parts and
whole kits for making a number of solid-state RF AMPLIFIERS,
principally made according to Motorola application notes done
mostly by Helge Granberg. C-C has some of those app notes
available for download although the quality wasn't good when I
checked them out about 3 years ago. I've heard good words about
C-C but never ordered anything from them myself.

Some of the old Motorola app notes still exist in downloadable form
from the archives of the Motorola website...or at least existed at
one time. Some of the old Motorola RF amplifier transistors are
now made by ON Semiconductor but the original Motorola solid-
state organizations did a rather monstrous downsizing of production
to more in-demand and profitable semiconductors.

Len Anderson
retired (from regular hours) electronic engineer person


I tried to get an old Motorola datasheet yesterday, and the entire
archive section was gone.

--
We now return you to our normally scheduled programming.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

Avery Fineman January 28th 04 06:45 AM

In article , "Michael A. Terrell"
writes:

I tried to get an old Motorola datasheet yesterday, and the entire
archive section was gone.


To paraphrase the Latin - Sick transit, gloria mundi. :-(

Check ON Semiconductor. They might still have some of the
datasheets.

Len Anderson
retired (from regular hours) electronic engineer person

Wes Stewart January 28th 04 07:06 PM

On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 18:01:19 -0800, "Tim Wescott"
wrote:

|Down-East Microwave also has kits for "drivers" (jeesh).
|
|Wes: Does the sky over your shack glow at night? During the day?

Not lately, my 2M EME station is in mothballs.

Pete KE9OA January 29th 04 02:32 PM

Hey Jim,
How is that HRO500 doing?

Pete

"jimbo" wrote in message
...
http://www.communication-concepts.com/hf_amplifiers.htm

Am I missing something here ???

jimbo

Wes wrote:

On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:35:11 GMT, jimbo wrote:

|hi jason,
|
|Check out this site, many good amplifers from Motorola designs.
|
|http://www.communication-concepts.com/default.htm

Those aren't "amplifiers", they are "drivers."

These are amplifiers:

http://web.wt.net/~w5un/8877-1.htm

http://www.svetlana.com/docs/TechBul...hnoteNo42.html

http://www.qsl.net/dl4mea/2g35.htm

http://www.qsl.net/wb5apd/144_new_amp.html

etc. etc...





jimbo January 30th 04 06:43 AM

hello Wes,

I will admit this is over my head if you'll admit trying to reply to
a .nospam.com email address is over your head !

lol,

share your info with all on usenet that is what it is for !

regards,

jimbo

Wes wrote:

On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 02:08:07 GMT, jimbo wrote:

|http://www.communication-concepts.com/hf_amplifiers.htm
|
|Am I missing something here ???

Yes and I tried to respond to your email message but your spoofed your
return address, so forget about it. If it's over your head, so be it.



jimbo January 30th 04 06:44 AM

hello Wes,

I will admit this is over my head if you'll admit trying to reply to
a .nospam.com email address is over your head !

lol,

share your info with all on usenet that is what it is for !

regards,

jimbo

Wes wrote:

On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 02:08:07 GMT, jimbo wrote:

|http://www.communication-concepts.com/hf_amplifiers.htm
|
|Am I missing something here ???

Yes and I tried to respond to your email message but your spoofed your
return address, so forget about it. If it's over your head, so be it.



jimbo January 30th 04 06:44 AM

hello Wes,

I will admit this is over my head if you'll admit trying to reply to
a .nospam.com email address is over your head !

lol,

share your info with all on usenet that is what it is for !

regards,

jimbo

Wes wrote:

On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 02:08:07 GMT, jimbo wrote:

|http://www.communication-concepts.com/hf_amplifiers.htm
|
|Am I missing something here ???

Yes and I tried to respond to your email message but your spoofed your
return address, so forget about it. If it's over your head, so be it.



Wes Stewart January 30th 04 02:51 PM

I'll only respond to this once instead of three times.

Why would anyone send a private email to someone and not include a
valid return email address? Selecting "reply" and typing a nice
return message seemed like a logical thing to do. I didn't ever
suppose that the idiot sending the message was just sending spam. Now
I know better.

I was just trying to save you the embarrassment of further public
ridicule.

Alas, I failed.


On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 06:44:35 GMT, jimbo
wrote:

|hello Wes,
|
|I will admit this is over my head if you'll admit trying to reply to
|a .nospam.com email address is over your head !
|
|lol,
|
|share your info with all on usenet that is what it is for !
|
|regards,
|
|jimbo
|
|Wes wrote:
|
| On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 02:08:07 GMT, jimbo wrote:
|
| |http://www.communication-concepts.com/hf_amplifiers.htm
| |
| |Am I missing something here ???
|
| Yes and I tried to respond to your email message but your spoofed your
| return address, so forget about it. If it's over your head, so be it.


Jimbo January 31st 04 06:42 AM

Hi Wes,

Not sure why it posted three times, wn has been having some trouble this
week.

Anyway, not everyone checks into usenet as often as regular email, so just a
courtesy
to reply to the group and individual. NOT SPAM.

The original post inquired about vhf amplifier designs on the net, I replied
with one link.
You provided several links too. Good.

If I should walk away a little smarter from something you or anyone else
posted that is a good
thing and nothing I should be embarrassed by.

Have a nice day.

jimbo


Wes Stewart wrote:

I'll only respond to this once instead of three times.

Why would anyone send a private email to someone and not include a
valid return email address? Selecting "reply" and typing a nice
return message seemed like a logical thing to do. I didn't ever
suppose that the idiot sending the message was just sending spam. Now
I know better.

I was just trying to save you the embarrassment of further public
ridicule.

Alas, I failed.

On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 06:44:35 GMT, jimbo
wrote:

|hello Wes,
|
|I will admit this is over my head if you'll admit trying to reply to
|a .nospam.com email address is over your head !
|
|lol,
|
|share your info with all on usenet that is what it is for !
|
|regards,
|
|jimbo
|
|Wes wrote:
|
| On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 02:08:07 GMT, jimbo wrote:
|
| |http://www.communication-concepts.com/hf_amplifiers.htm
| |
| |Am I missing something here ???
|
| Yes and I tried to respond to your email message but your spoofed your
| return address, so forget about it. If it's over your head, so be it.




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com