Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Nosko wrote:
I believe he is talking about adjacent channel signals which are much stronger than the desired and trying to see if there is a way to "fix" that. Capture does not apply for this situation. Capture is a co-channel effect and is better the wider the whole system is, not just the IF. Capture effect: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capture_effect It's an intersting phenomena, and potentially useful. If I could phase null (at the antenna) the local stronger signal then it would dissappear as inteference if it was a few db below the wanted signal. Only problem is, is that if you cannot get the inteferring signal below the wanted one, it's works very bad for you, because you cannot listen to an inteferred with signal. Which is better than nothing I guess in some cases. Pity that somehow you cannot design circuitry which recognises a 100Khz difference between the wanted FM station and the unwanted FM station and proceed to demodulate the wanted one only. If it were possible, it would have been done by now. Maybe you could do it digitally,I dunno. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New antenna technology??? | Antenna | |||
FS, Book, 'Electromagnetic Waves and Radiating Systems' & 'Transmission Technology..." | Antenna | |||
RFI caused by BPL soon resolved ? | Equipment | |||
Internet trials and the European EMC directive | Equipment | |||
Internet trials and the European EMC directive | Equipment |