LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5   Report Post  
Old April 11th 04, 11:12 AM
Robert Baer
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Paul Burridge wrote:

On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 08:22:21 GMT, Robert Baer
wrote:

Not a varactor (diode), but a switching diode; fast. Snap-off is lotz
better.
And they are a *LOT* smaller!


Thanks, Robert (and all else)
I'd prefer a diode solution as there'd be no power supply requirements
for each device. The tiny size is an added bonus, of course. But
what's the drawback with superfast switching diodes as against active
inverters? I'm sure there must be (at least) one...


An active inverter is S L O W by comparison; a good, fast diode can
have turnoff times in the tens of picoseconds region.


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017