Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 16:27:29 -0700, Tim Wescott
wrote: John Popelish wrote: Just for efficiency reasons, I think you would want ot have enough capacitance across the regulator input that the cell resistance drops voltage only with respect ot the average output current, not the switcher peak value. This can be a pretty big factor in the overall efficiency. Using a switcher that has little ripple current on its input (two phase boost, for instance) makes this much easier. That's not the point. Because a switcher tends to draw a constant power from a load it's input impedance has a negative resistive component. If you match this with a source that has a too-high impedance it'll be _unstable_; a big capacitor would just slow it down in this case. While there certainly are going to be stability issues, using a switcher with say 50 % duty cycle will draw 0 A half of the time (i.e. the PV cell is operating in the constant voltage mode) and 2 Iave the other half of the time (i.e. the cell would operate in the constant current mode) and never operate at the maximum power point (here assumed to be at Iave). Sufficient parallel capacitances and/or series inductances or some push-pull arrangement will keep the current constantly at Iave and thus at the maximum power point. Paul |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1420 - October 29, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1420 - October 29, 2004 | Dx | |||
Cell Phone Hardline | Antenna | |||
SOLAR constant voltage Xmfr question? | Equipment | |||
SOLAR constant voltage Xmfr question? | Equipment |