Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old April 18th 04, 04:16 AM
Watson A.Name - \Watt Sun, the Dark Remover\
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Anthony Matonak" wrote in message
...
Watson A.Name - \"Watt Sun, the Dark Remover\" wrote:
"Anthony Matonak" wrote in message
You could chose to eliminate chicken as well as beef, eggs and

dairy.
I'm no expert in either nutrition or food prices but I think you

could

[snip]

The price penalty becomes even greater when you purchase food

products
that eliminate meat such as silk and soy bean and tofu meat

substitutes.
It's a matter of supply and demand; most people don't buy these

things,
so the prices are higher.


The price penalty is only on items that try to replace or substitute
for meat (and often failing miserably). If you simply purchase items
such as beans, rice, grains, nuts and so forth, as they exist in
nature (or at least, supermarket shelves) then their prices become

very
low.


Last I checked, nuts were more expensive than some meats. And most
people haven't got a clue as to how to eat a meat-free diet and get
proper nutrition. That's the problem.

[snip]
Anthony



  #2   Report Post  
Old April 18th 04, 09:02 AM
Anthony Matonak
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Watson A.Name - \"Watt Sun, the Dark Remover\" wrote:
"Anthony Matonak" wrote in message

The price penalty is only on items that try to replace or substitute
for meat (and often failing miserably). If you simply purchase items
such as beans, rice, grains, nuts and so forth, as they exist in
nature (or at least, supermarket shelves) then their prices become

very
low.


Last I checked, nuts were more expensive than some meats. And most
people haven't got a clue as to how to eat a meat-free diet and get
proper nutrition. That's the problem.


Well, then don't buy more expensive products and educate yourself
about proper nutrition. It's not like this is especially complex or
the information particularly difficult to find.

Anthony

  #3   Report Post  
Old April 18th 04, 09:02 AM
Anthony Matonak
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Watson A.Name - \"Watt Sun, the Dark Remover\" wrote:
"Anthony Matonak" wrote in message

The price penalty is only on items that try to replace or substitute
for meat (and often failing miserably). If you simply purchase items
such as beans, rice, grains, nuts and so forth, as they exist in
nature (or at least, supermarket shelves) then their prices become

very
low.


Last I checked, nuts were more expensive than some meats. And most
people haven't got a clue as to how to eat a meat-free diet and get
proper nutrition. That's the problem.


Well, then don't buy more expensive products and educate yourself
about proper nutrition. It's not like this is especially complex or
the information particularly difficult to find.

Anthony

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1420 - October 29, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 October 29th 04 09:10 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1420 - October 29, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 October 29th 04 09:10 PM
Cell Phone Hardline Theplanters95 Antenna 6 September 4th 04 02:38 PM
SOLAR constant voltage Xmfr question? Bruce Anderson Equipment 6 November 30th 03 12:00 AM
SOLAR constant voltage Xmfr question? Bruce Anderson Equipment 0 November 29th 03 04:57 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:17 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017