Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old April 23rd 04, 04:45 PM
P. Venkman
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Tim Wescott wrote in message ...
P. Venkman wrote:

SNIP

Is it as simple as finding a filter that passes 72 MHz along and
splicing it in to the wire going to the antenna? Is that likely to
cause other problems (transmitting on the wrong frequency, overheating
the RF module due to impedance mismatch, sudden death)? Assuming I
can't find a filter that passes along precisely the frequency I want,
is it OK to put filters in series (like a high-pass plus a low-pass)?
And finally, am I just totally missing the boat here with this idea?
I'm open to other suggestions.


First, you can really mess things up by playing the filter game, so
don't do it unless you need to.

Second, it may be that the transmitter has a weaker signal, or that it
is a bit off frequency. Since your average military base has about a
gazillion different transmitters it's likely that there is some spur
being generated at 72MHz, or a valid signal at your RX's image
frequency. If your transmitter is a bit weak than such a signal from
the base would have an easy time getting into your RX.

If you can get the receiver out of the plane (or if you can get to the
antenna) do a range check with the RX antenna rolled up but with the TX
antenna extended. I'd do this at some _other_ flying site. Check the
range with the suspect TX and with a known good one. If it's
significantly lower with the suspect TX then you can do all the
filtering in the world and it won't help you -- but having the new TX
fixed (or selling it and getting another brand) may help a lot.


When I first had the problem I sent the transmitter back for service -
they didn't find anything wrong, but tuned it anyway and sent it back.
The problem still existed, so I got them to replace the transmitter.
Still the same problem.

At other flying sites the new transmitter actually range checks better
than the old transmitter when checked against multiple different
receivers. For these two reasons I don't think it's that this TX has
a weaker or off-frequency signal.

Lots of other people fly at the same location with a variety of
equipement with no trouble. I've flown a variety of different gliders
there with my old transmitter and never had a problem. I really don't
think there's a conflicting 72 MHz signal.

It really is just this transmitter at this particular site - other
transmitters at the same site are fine, and this transmitter at other
sites is just fine.

Is there any way to make this work?
  #2   Report Post  
Old April 23rd 04, 05:36 PM
Tim Wescott
 
Posts: n/a
Default

P. Venkman wrote:

Tim Wescott wrote in message ...

P. Venkman wrote:


SNIP

Is it as simple as finding a filter that passes 72 MHz along and
splicing it in to the wire going to the antenna? Is that likely to
cause other problems (transmitting on the wrong frequency, overheating
the RF module due to impedance mismatch, sudden death)? Assuming I
can't find a filter that passes along precisely the frequency I want,
is it OK to put filters in series (like a high-pass plus a low-pass)?
And finally, am I just totally missing the boat here with this idea?
I'm open to other suggestions.


First, you can really mess things up by playing the filter game, so
don't do it unless you need to.

Second, it may be that the transmitter has a weaker signal, or that it
is a bit off frequency. Since your average military base has about a
gazillion different transmitters it's likely that there is some spur
being generated at 72MHz, or a valid signal at your RX's image
frequency. If your transmitter is a bit weak than such a signal from
the base would have an easy time getting into your RX.

If you can get the receiver out of the plane (or if you can get to the
antenna) do a range check with the RX antenna rolled up but with the TX
antenna extended. I'd do this at some _other_ flying site. Check the
range with the suspect TX and with a known good one. If it's
significantly lower with the suspect TX then you can do all the
filtering in the world and it won't help you -- but having the new TX
fixed (or selling it and getting another brand) may help a lot.



When I first had the problem I sent the transmitter back for service -
they didn't find anything wrong, but tuned it anyway and sent it back.
The problem still existed, so I got them to replace the transmitter.
Still the same problem.

At other flying sites the new transmitter actually range checks better
than the old transmitter when checked against multiple different
receivers. For these two reasons I don't think it's that this TX has
a weaker or off-frequency signal.

Lots of other people fly at the same location with a variety of
equipement with no trouble. I've flown a variety of different gliders
there with my old transmitter and never had a problem. I really don't
think there's a conflicting 72 MHz signal.

It really is just this transmitter at this particular site - other
transmitters at the same site are fine, and this transmitter at other
sites is just fine.

Is there any way to make this work?


Not without more information, which was why I suggested a test.

Did you do the range check against the other transmitters with the TX
antenna collapsed? If so, then you've done a fine test of how well your
TX will work compared to others -- with everyone's antennas are
collapsed. If you normally fly it with the antenna _out_ then you need
to test it that way, and find some other way of attenuating the signal
to the receiver -- like rolling up _it's_ antenna.

You obviously have a problem with that particular TX, which is why I'm
suggesting a look at the TX first. Another question you can ask is does
the TX have the same problem with other receivers? On other
frequencies? Do you have another plane with a different brand receiver,
or a buddy with same, that you can try at the problem site? This may be
a valid thing to try.

--

Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
http://www.wescottdesign.com
  #3   Report Post  
Old April 26th 04, 05:02 PM
P. Venkman
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Tim Wescott wrote in message ...
P. Venkman wrote:

Tim Wescott wrote in message ...

P. Venkman wrote:


SNIP


Is there any way to make this work?


Not without more information, which was why I suggested a test.

Did you do the range check against the other transmitters with the TX
antenna collapsed? If so, then you've done a fine test of how well your
TX will work compared to others -- with everyone's antennas are
collapsed. If you normally fly it with the antenna _out_ then you need
to test it that way, and find some other way of attenuating the signal
to the receiver -- like rolling up _it's_ antenna.

You obviously have a problem with that particular TX, which is why I'm
suggesting a look at the TX first. Another question you can ask is does
the TX have the same problem with other receivers? On other
frequencies? Do you have another plane with a different brand receiver,
or a buddy with same, that you can try at the problem site? This may be
a valid thing to try.


I've done the range check with the antenna in; under normal
circumstances the range is further than I can see with the antenna
out. I can try rolling up the receiver antenna.

I've tried the transmitter with 5 different receivers (4 different
brands) on 5 different frequencies, all with the exact same problem.

At one point I had two different receivers (different brands) on the
same frequency turned on, and when they glitched they both glitched in
exactly the same way (rudder went hard right on both models, for
example). This isn't proof, but in general you wouldn't expect two
receivers to glitch in exactly the same way if the problem is
interference at the receiver.
  #4   Report Post  
Old April 26th 04, 05:38 PM
Tim Wescott
 
Posts: n/a
Default

P. Venkman wrote:

Tim Wescott wrote in message ...

P. Venkman wrote:


Tim Wescott wrote in message ...


P. Venkman wrote:


SNIP


Is there any way to make this work?


Not without more information, which was why I suggested a test.

Did you do the range check against the other transmitters with the TX
antenna collapsed? If so, then you've done a fine test of how well your
TX will work compared to others -- with everyone's antennas are
collapsed. If you normally fly it with the antenna _out_ then you need
to test it that way, and find some other way of attenuating the signal
to the receiver -- like rolling up _it's_ antenna.

You obviously have a problem with that particular TX, which is why I'm
suggesting a look at the TX first. Another question you can ask is does
the TX have the same problem with other receivers? On other
frequencies? Do you have another plane with a different brand receiver,
or a buddy with same, that you can try at the problem site? This may be
a valid thing to try.



I've done the range check with the antenna in; under normal
circumstances the range is further than I can see with the antenna
out. I can try rolling up the receiver antenna.

I've tried the transmitter with 5 different receivers (4 different
brands) on 5 different frequencies, all with the exact same problem.

At one point I had two different receivers (different brands) on the
same frequency turned on, and when they glitched they both glitched in
exactly the same way (rudder went hard right on both models, for
example). This isn't proof, but in general you wouldn't expect two
receivers to glitch in exactly the same way if the problem is
interference at the receiver.


If two receivers are receiving exactly the same interference at exactly
the same time they may glitch the same way.

Since it's a synthesized module and should be easy to do, have you tried
it on a different frequency (with appropriate RX, of course)? Obviously
something screwy is going on, if it's limited to one frequency you may
be able to just switch to a more benign frequency and have fun.

You could switch to flying control line, but that gets difficult with
gliders.

--

Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
http://www.wescottdesign.com
  #5   Report Post  
Old April 26th 04, 11:25 PM
P. Venkman
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Tim Wescott wrote in message ...
P. Venkman wrote:

Tim Wescott wrote in message ...

P. Venkman wrote:


Tim Wescott wrote in message ...


P. Venkman wrote:

SNIP

I've tried the transmitter with 5 different receivers (4 different
brands) on 5 different frequencies, all with the exact same problem.

At one point I had two different receivers (different brands) on the
same frequency turned on, and when they glitched they both glitched in
exactly the same way (rudder went hard right on both models, for
example). This isn't proof, but in general you wouldn't expect two
receivers to glitch in exactly the same way if the problem is
interference at the receiver.


If two receivers are receiving exactly the same interference at exactly
the same time they may glitch the same way.


Possible; however, they were different brands and different circuits,
and it's less likely that some random interference would cause them to
act the exact same way. The same brand wouldn't surprise me.


Since it's a synthesized module and should be easy to do, have you tried
it on a different frequency (with appropriate RX, of course)? Obviously
something screwy is going on, if it's limited to one frequency you may
be able to just switch to a more benign frequency and have fun.


I've tried 5 different frequencies; all act the same way.


You could switch to flying control line, but that gets difficult with
gliders.


I think at that point it becomes a kite!


  #6   Report Post  
Old April 26th 04, 11:25 PM
P. Venkman
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Tim Wescott wrote in message ...
P. Venkman wrote:

Tim Wescott wrote in message ...

P. Venkman wrote:


Tim Wescott wrote in message ...


P. Venkman wrote:

SNIP

I've tried the transmitter with 5 different receivers (4 different
brands) on 5 different frequencies, all with the exact same problem.

At one point I had two different receivers (different brands) on the
same frequency turned on, and when they glitched they both glitched in
exactly the same way (rudder went hard right on both models, for
example). This isn't proof, but in general you wouldn't expect two
receivers to glitch in exactly the same way if the problem is
interference at the receiver.


If two receivers are receiving exactly the same interference at exactly
the same time they may glitch the same way.


Possible; however, they were different brands and different circuits,
and it's less likely that some random interference would cause them to
act the exact same way. The same brand wouldn't surprise me.


Since it's a synthesized module and should be easy to do, have you tried
it on a different frequency (with appropriate RX, of course)? Obviously
something screwy is going on, if it's limited to one frequency you may
be able to just switch to a more benign frequency and have fun.


I've tried 5 different frequencies; all act the same way.


You could switch to flying control line, but that gets difficult with
gliders.


I think at that point it becomes a kite!
  #7   Report Post  
Old April 26th 04, 05:38 PM
Tim Wescott
 
Posts: n/a
Default

P. Venkman wrote:

Tim Wescott wrote in message ...

P. Venkman wrote:


Tim Wescott wrote in message ...


P. Venkman wrote:


SNIP


Is there any way to make this work?


Not without more information, which was why I suggested a test.

Did you do the range check against the other transmitters with the TX
antenna collapsed? If so, then you've done a fine test of how well your
TX will work compared to others -- with everyone's antennas are
collapsed. If you normally fly it with the antenna _out_ then you need
to test it that way, and find some other way of attenuating the signal
to the receiver -- like rolling up _it's_ antenna.

You obviously have a problem with that particular TX, which is why I'm
suggesting a look at the TX first. Another question you can ask is does
the TX have the same problem with other receivers? On other
frequencies? Do you have another plane with a different brand receiver,
or a buddy with same, that you can try at the problem site? This may be
a valid thing to try.



I've done the range check with the antenna in; under normal
circumstances the range is further than I can see with the antenna
out. I can try rolling up the receiver antenna.

I've tried the transmitter with 5 different receivers (4 different
brands) on 5 different frequencies, all with the exact same problem.

At one point I had two different receivers (different brands) on the
same frequency turned on, and when they glitched they both glitched in
exactly the same way (rudder went hard right on both models, for
example). This isn't proof, but in general you wouldn't expect two
receivers to glitch in exactly the same way if the problem is
interference at the receiver.


If two receivers are receiving exactly the same interference at exactly
the same time they may glitch the same way.

Since it's a synthesized module and should be easy to do, have you tried
it on a different frequency (with appropriate RX, of course)? Obviously
something screwy is going on, if it's limited to one frequency you may
be able to just switch to a more benign frequency and have fun.

You could switch to flying control line, but that gets difficult with
gliders.

--

Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
http://www.wescottdesign.com
  #8   Report Post  
Old April 26th 04, 05:02 PM
P. Venkman
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Tim Wescott wrote in message ...
P. Venkman wrote:

Tim Wescott wrote in message ...

P. Venkman wrote:


SNIP


Is there any way to make this work?


Not without more information, which was why I suggested a test.

Did you do the range check against the other transmitters with the TX
antenna collapsed? If so, then you've done a fine test of how well your
TX will work compared to others -- with everyone's antennas are
collapsed. If you normally fly it with the antenna _out_ then you need
to test it that way, and find some other way of attenuating the signal
to the receiver -- like rolling up _it's_ antenna.

You obviously have a problem with that particular TX, which is why I'm
suggesting a look at the TX first. Another question you can ask is does
the TX have the same problem with other receivers? On other
frequencies? Do you have another plane with a different brand receiver,
or a buddy with same, that you can try at the problem site? This may be
a valid thing to try.


I've done the range check with the antenna in; under normal
circumstances the range is further than I can see with the antenna
out. I can try rolling up the receiver antenna.

I've tried the transmitter with 5 different receivers (4 different
brands) on 5 different frequencies, all with the exact same problem.

At one point I had two different receivers (different brands) on the
same frequency turned on, and when they glitched they both glitched in
exactly the same way (rudder went hard right on both models, for
example). This isn't proof, but in general you wouldn't expect two
receivers to glitch in exactly the same way if the problem is
interference at the receiver.
  #9   Report Post  
Old April 23rd 04, 05:43 PM
Harold E. Johnson
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Lots of other people fly at the same location with a variety of
equipement with no trouble. I've flown a variety of different gliders
there with my old transmitter and never had a problem. I really don't
think there's a conflicting 72 MHz signal.

It really is just this transmitter at this particular site - other
transmitters at the same site are fine, and this transmitter at other
sites is just fine.

Is there any way to make this work?


You didn't say, but if that "military site" is an airport, there's a
localizer beacon that's probably just off the end of the runway and is on 75
MHz. Could readily be strong enough to give your receiver trouble.

W4ZCB


  #10   Report Post  
Old April 26th 04, 05:11 PM
P. Venkman
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Harold E. Johnson" wrote in message news:vIbic.12068$IW1.760683@attbi_s52...
Lots of other people fly at the same location with a variety of
equipement with no trouble. I've flown a variety of different gliders
there with my old transmitter and never had a problem. I really don't
think there's a conflicting 72 MHz signal.

It really is just this transmitter at this particular site - other
transmitters at the same site are fine, and this transmitter at other
sites is just fine.

Is there any way to make this work?


You didn't say, but if that "military site" is an airport, there's a
localizer beacon that's probably just off the end of the runway and is on 75
MHz. Could readily be strong enough to give your receiver trouble.

W4ZCB



It's not an airport, but who knows what they have blasting away on any
number of frequencies. I don't have the equipment to check it out.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1398 ­ May 28, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 May 28th 04 07:59 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1391 – April 8, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 April 11th 04 04:24 AM
Amateur Radio Newslin(tm) Report 1385 – February 27, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 March 4th 04 09:52 PM
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1384 February 20, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 February 27th 04 09:41 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 January 18th 04 09:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017