Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Paul Keinanen" wrote in message
... On Sun, 06 Jun 2004 17:59:00 -0500, Ed Bailen wrote: The last issue of QST had a short article on the CircuitMaker Student edition circuit design package. I downloaded it and spent several hours trying various oscillator designs (including the phase shift oscillator discussed in the same issue of QST). I couldn't get any of the designs to oscillate! I was mainly trying Colpitts oscillators. Typically, an oscillator is just a noise amplifier with some frequency selective feedback. In a real oscillator, there is always some wide band thermal noise present, which is amplified, some selected frequencies are circulated back to the input and reamplified and so on. Finally, there is going to be a narrow spectral line and a wide band noise floor due to the thermal noise, assuming of course that the phase, amplification and feedback loss conditions are correct. If the simulator does not simulate the thermal noise inherent in all resistors and semiconductors in temperatures above absolute zero, it is not very likely that the design would oscillate. Inject a very low level wide band noise into the amplifying stage and the oscillation should start. However, I have never seen the CircuitMaker or how to generate a wide band noise signal with it. Injecting a pulse usually works with SPICE, I've found. Leon |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Leon Heller" wrote in message ... "Paul Keinanen" wrote in message ... On Sun, 06 Jun 2004 17:59:00 -0500, Ed Bailen wrote: The last issue of QST had a short article on the CircuitMaker Student edition circuit design package. I downloaded it and spent several hours trying various oscillator designs (including the phase shift oscillator discussed in the same issue of QST). I couldn't get any of the designs to oscillate! I was mainly trying Colpitts oscillators. Typically, an oscillator is just a noise amplifier with some frequency selective feedback. ... If the simulator does not simulate the thermal noise I do not believe this is necessary. The normal charge-up of any coupling caps will get you "off center" at the start. On PSpice ver 9 one of my students "couldn't get an oscillator to go". I lenghtend the simulation time and found that it took longer than he had set for the transient analysis. Out of the box on PSpice I got both a 555 and Colpitts to fly. I can't speak to CircuitMaker, but there may be analysis set-up parameters such as the aforementioned initial condition which may be the key. PSpice also has something about "skipping" an initial transient state/solution which I haven't experimented with to comment further, but could be a consideration. Watch the options... -- Steve N, K,9;d, c. i My email has no u's. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 17:21:03 -0500, "Steve Nosko"
wrote: Out of the box on PSpice I got both a 555 and Colpitts to fly. The 555 should start unconditionally, since it is based of the RC time constant and two comparator levels. Thus, it should not matter, what the initial charge in C is, since sooner or later one of the comparators will change state. A startup transient in the Colpitts may very well start the oscillation, since the transient is rich of harmonics and if one of the harmonics is connected back with sufficient gain through the frequency selective feedback, the oscillation should start. Paul OH3LWR |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 17:21:03 -0500, "Steve Nosko"
wrote: Out of the box on PSpice I got both a 555 and Colpitts to fly. The 555 should start unconditionally, since it is based of the RC time constant and two comparator levels. Thus, it should not matter, what the initial charge in C is, since sooner or later one of the comparators will change state. A startup transient in the Colpitts may very well start the oscillation, since the transient is rich of harmonics and if one of the harmonics is connected back with sufficient gain through the frequency selective feedback, the oscillation should start. Paul OH3LWR |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Leon Heller" wrote in message ... "Paul Keinanen" wrote in message ... On Sun, 06 Jun 2004 17:59:00 -0500, Ed Bailen wrote: The last issue of QST had a short article on the CircuitMaker Student edition circuit design package. I downloaded it and spent several hours trying various oscillator designs (including the phase shift oscillator discussed in the same issue of QST). I couldn't get any of the designs to oscillate! I was mainly trying Colpitts oscillators. Typically, an oscillator is just a noise amplifier with some frequency selective feedback. ... If the simulator does not simulate the thermal noise I do not believe this is necessary. The normal charge-up of any coupling caps will get you "off center" at the start. On PSpice ver 9 one of my students "couldn't get an oscillator to go". I lenghtend the simulation time and found that it took longer than he had set for the transient analysis. Out of the box on PSpice I got both a 555 and Colpitts to fly. I can't speak to CircuitMaker, but there may be analysis set-up parameters such as the aforementioned initial condition which may be the key. PSpice also has something about "skipping" an initial transient state/solution which I haven't experimented with to comment further, but could be a consideration. Watch the options... -- Steve N, K,9;d, c. i My email has no u's. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Radware DSP100 "software" Transceiver | Equipment | |||
Radware DSP100 "software" Transceiver | Equipment | |||
Radware DSP100 "software" Transceiver | Equipment | |||
LOTW contains spyware? | Dx |