Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Greg_False" wrote in message
... I don't think there's anything wrong with the radio, it is fairly new, I was hoping to snatch the last bit of a fading signal from the ether. It is a very simple radio, the only controls are channel selection, squelch and volume. I know, get a more professional bit of kit, but I'm always challenged to try and improve things, which eventually costs more than buying the correct thing in the first place. I thing I've got the message, don't waste my time:(( Greg Amidst all the quotes and suggestions, I didn't see an explanation of why people are saying what they are saying. Here's an attempt at an explanation. There is noise in the air, and more noise at lower frequencies. Meanwhile, especially with transistors, it is easier to get gain at lower frequencies than at higher. Once you can hear the noise, no additional gain is going to help. The signal that was below the noise will still be below the noise, only the noise and the signal will be louder. At 40 meters, there is so much noise that it borders on impossible to make a receiver that doesn't have more than enough gain. At 2 meters and above, the noise is very low, and gain is hard to get. So hard, in fact, that noise in the transistors becomes an issue. It isn't an issue at lower frequencies. At VHF and above, if you want to increase the gain you need to do it at the first stage, otherwise you will be amplifying the noise in the earlier stages. Furthermore, at VHF and above, coax losses tend to be high, so it makes sense to amplify the signal before it has been attenuated by the coax, and possibly fallen into the internal noise of the amplifier. At HF, coax loss isn't much of an issue (except for antennas operated at very high SWR), so if you would need a preamp, putting it at the antenna end of the coax isn't the big advantage that it is at VHF/UHF. Now, the reason for a little waffling is that 10 meters is kind of in no-man's land. Band noise is quite low, and it does take some work to get the gain you need. It tends not to be expensive to get that gain, so even cheap radios will sometimes have enough gain, but not always. Back thirty years ago, it was hard to get enough gain on 10, so many older radios could use a little help. But today, two bucks will buy a chip with ten times the gain you can use on ten meters. The reason for the suggestion on unplugging the antenna should now be obvious. If you can hear the difference in background noise with the antenna plugged in versus not, then you have enough gain in your receiver that a preamp will do no good. This is a worthwhile experiment, given that you have indicated it is a low end rig. I'm sure you hear "band noise", but if it's a sufficiently low end rig that noise could be coming from inside the receiver. Not likely, but still possible. The antenna experiment will put that question to rest. The reason for the idea of going into the radio to locate the preamp was simply one of convenience - the relay you need is already there. Unlike at VHF, there really isn't a big advantage to putting the preamp at the end of the coax, so why not mount it near the radio where you already have power and don't have to waterproof it, and taking it a step further, why not take advantage of the relay that's already there. Oh yes, and if you do build a preamp, don't sweat the SWR bump at the relay. As long as you keep all the connections reasonably short and straight it won't be an issue. Hope this helps a bit ... |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Antenna | |||
Yaesu FT-857D questions | Equipment | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna |