Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 19:01:34 -0230, "Terry"
wrote: [explanation snipped] Many thanks indeed, Terry. Set out that way, I'll have no trouble remembering which way around it works in future,which will certainlybe a first! The only other question which arises is: having got the correct turns ratio established; how does one determine the minimum number of total turns needed to make a transformer that will actually give a reasonable performance? For example, why pick say T50:T150 if you can get away with T10:T30? The ratio in each case is the same, but I'll wager there's a performace price to be paid by going for the fewer-turns option! Anyone know? -- "What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tx Source Impedance & Load Reflections | Antenna | |||
FS: PSC-10 Hammarlund Speaker for HQ-129X | Boatanchors | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit | Antenna | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna |