LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8   Report Post  
Old July 14th 04, 11:49 PM
Paul Burridge
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 19:01:34 -0230, "Terry"
wrote:

[explanation snipped]

Many thanks indeed, Terry. Set out that way, I'll have no trouble
remembering which way around it works in future,which will certainlybe
a first!
The only other question which arises is: having got the correct turns
ratio established; how does one determine the minimum number of total
turns needed to make a transformer that will actually give a
reasonable performance? For example, why pick say T50:T150 if you can
get away with T10:T30? The ratio in each case is the same, but I'll
wager there's a performace price to be paid by going for the
fewer-turns option! Anyone know?

--

"What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793.
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tx Source Impedance & Load Reflections Richard Fry Antenna 8 May 28th 04 06:29 PM
FS: PSC-10 Hammarlund Speaker for HQ-129X Michael Melland Boatanchors 1 February 7th 04 02:47 AM
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) Dr. Slick Antenna 199 September 12th 03 10:06 PM
Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit Dr. Slick Antenna 126 September 10th 03 04:26 PM
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? Dr. Slick Antenna 255 July 29th 03 11:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017