Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Welcome to the world of transformer design.
What you need to do is make the impedance of the winding considerably higher than the impedance of the load. For example, the winding connected to the 32 ohm load should have an impedance that's several times 32 ohms. A factor of 5 or 10 is generally adequate to keep the disturbance of the winding to a tolerable level, so shoot for about 160 - 320 ohms of impedance. You'll need to consult the data for the core you're using to determine how many turns that will require. Do this calculation for either winding -- the other will come out the same if the impedances are matched. When you're dealing with audio and ordinary cores, the winding impedance will primarily be reactive, and the winding inductance will be fairly constant with frequency for a given number of turns. Consequently, the winding impedance (reatance) will be directly proportional to frequency. That means you need to do the calculation at the lowest audio frequency you intend to pass through the transformer. Capacitive coupling between the windings and other effects tend to interfere with proper transformer action at high frequencies, so high frequency performance degrades if you use way more turns than needed. Truly high fidelity audio transformer design is something of an art -- the audio output transformer was often a major limiting factor in tube-type audio amplifier performance. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Paul Burridge wrote: On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 19:01:34 -0230, "Terry" wrote: [explanation snipped] Many thanks indeed, Terry. Set out that way, I'll have no trouble remembering which way around it works in future,which will certainlybe a first! The only other question which arises is: having got the correct turns ratio established; how does one determine the minimum number of total turns needed to make a transformer that will actually give a reasonable performance? For example, why pick say T50:T150 if you can get away with T10:T30? The ratio in each case is the same, but I'll wager there's a performace price to be paid by going for the fewer-turns option! Anyone know? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tx Source Impedance & Load Reflections | Antenna | |||
FS: PSC-10 Hammarlund Speaker for HQ-129X | Boatanchors | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit | Antenna | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna |