On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 21:57:39 -0400, keith wrote:

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 15:04:53 -0500, John Fields wrote:

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 12:08:37 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 19:34:57 +0100, Paul Burridge
wrote:

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 11:12:18 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

Tube class-C amps often self-bias (via grid rectification) when
operating normally. Without drive, they often have high, sometimes
dangerous, idle currents.

Toobz? I was talking of transistors. Many tranny designs for Class C
RF utilize self-bias, too, but there is still no quiescent current!


What makes an amp Class C is a low conduction angle while operating.
When it's not operating, is has no class at all.

---
I ran into a surgeon like that once...

Burridge? shudder


He said surgeon, not sturgeon.

John

I read in sci.electronics.design that John Larkin jjlarkin@highSNIPland
THIStechPLEASEnology.com wrote (in 7fo6j05rp857et2n7tbqlp12bavl48qrrv@
4ax.com) about 'How to bias a MOSFET amp?', on Mon, 30 Aug 2004:
He said surgeon, not sturgeon.


But, being male, PB is not even a potential source of caviar.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk

On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 18:53:56 +0100, John Woodgate
wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that John Larkin jjlarkin@highSNIPland
THIStechPLEASEnology.com wrote (in 7fo6j05rp857et2n7tbqlp12bavl48qrrv@
4ax.com) about 'How to bias a MOSFET amp?', on Mon, 30 Aug 2004:
He said surgeon, not sturgeon.


But, being male, PB is not even a potential source of caviar.

Hey ladies, gimme a break will ya? Don't make your PMS my problem. ;-)
--

"What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793.

On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 18:53:56 +0100, John Woodgate
wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that John Larkin jjlarkin@highSNIPland
THIStechPLEASEnology.com wrote (in 7fo6j05rp857et2n7tbqlp12bavl48qrrv@
4ax.com) about 'How to bias a MOSFET amp?', on Mon, 30 Aug 2004:
He said surgeon, not sturgeon.


But, being male, PB is not even a potential source of caviar.

---
But most of what he sources _is_ fishy.

--
John Fields

On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 18:53:56 +0100, John Woodgate wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that John Larkin jjlarkin@highSNIPland
THIStechPLEASEnology.com wrote (in 7fo6j05rp857et2n7tbqlp12bavl48qrrv@
4ax.com) about 'How to bias a MOSFET amp?', on Mon, 30 Aug 2004:
He said surgeon, not sturgeon.


But, being male, PB is not even a potential source of caviar.

OTOH, he's a good source of other slime. If you want ot go there, be my
guest!

--
Keith

On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 19:11:01 +0100, Paul Burridge wrote:

On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 18:53:56 +0100, John Woodgate
wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that John Larkin jjlarkin@highSNIPland
THIStechPLEASEnology.com wrote (in 7fo6j05rp857et2n7tbqlp12bavl48qrrv@
4ax.com) about 'How to bias a MOSFET amp?', on Mon, 30 Aug 2004:
He said surgeon, not sturgeon.


But, being male, PB is not even a potential source of caviar.

Hey ladies, gimme a break will ya? Don't make your PMS my problem. ;-)

Paul's Miserable ****?

--
Keith

keith wrote:

On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 19:11:01 +0100, Paul Burridge wrote:

On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 18:53:56 +0100, John Woodgate
wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that John Larkin jjlarkin@highSNIPland
THIStechPLEASEnology.com wrote (in 7fo6j05rp857et2n7tbqlp12bavl48qrrv@
4ax.com) about 'How to bias a MOSFET amp?', on Mon, 30 Aug 2004:
He said surgeon, not sturgeon.


But, being male, PB is not even a potential source of caviar.

Hey ladies, gimme a break will ya? Don't make your PMS my problem. ;-)

Paul's Miserable ****?

Psychotic Male Syndrome.