Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Airy R. Bean wrote:
I forgot the SPC, but that appears to need a differential capacitor that I haven't yet obtained (or made). The SPC circuits I've seen (including the classic design in the late '90s ARRL Handbook) does not use a differential capacitor. Its output capacitor is a dual-section non-differential type - the two sections track in parallel. I have seen some T-type tuners which use a differential capacitor, with one section being the input cap and the other being the output cap. MFJ sells one of these. These are advertised as being more convenient, since establishing a match requires tuning only two controls rather than three. However, I doubt that this arrangement results in the most efficient match. Also, ISTR reading somewhere (that I cannot find) that the SPC arrangement is very lossy, and can result in 3/4 of the power being lost in the ATU itself) I don't think that's a specific characteristic of the SPC - it seems to be true of T tuners in general. The T configuration does provide a wide matching range, but in the case of very low-impedance or highly reactive loads the "match" may result in extremely high circulating currents through the coil, with the resulting high losses. A "T" tuner with sufficient reactance in the components may let you establish a "match" for a short-circuited load... but you'll end up dissipating almost 100% of your power in the coil. The SPC probably shares the same characteristic. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Hosting the Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks - that explains it nicely.
"Dave Platt" wrote in message ... In article , Airy R. Bean wrote: I forgot the SPC, but that appears to need a differential capacitor that I haven't yet obtained (or made). I don't think that's a specific characteristic of the SPC - it seems to be true of T tuners in general. The T configuration does provide a wide matching range, but in the case of very low-impedance or highly reactive loads the "match" may result in extremely high circulating currents through the coil, with the resulting high losses. A "T" tuner with sufficient reactance in the components may let you establish a "match" for a short-circuited load... but you'll end up dissipating almost 100% of your power in the coil. The SPC probably shares the same characteristic. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|