![]() |
"Paul Burridge" wrote in message ... On 09 Sep 2004 11:42:56 GMT, (Troglodite) wrote: About the closest group to beating us in public visibility is probably those guys and gals with the battling robots with buzz saws on PBS robot wars, right? ;-) ;-) But technically, those machines are NOT robots. If they were true robots, they would devise their own strategy. They are simply radio controlled devices. Yes, as yet. But given time, no doubt there'll be a category for autonymous fighting robots. A few of us have attempted it, but only scratched the surface of the possibilities. I only have a link to this one. http://www.cuuav.org/ There are already soccer playing robots in development (and playing games in competition) at some universities. You obviously don't watch TV's NOVA. -- Steve N, K,9;d, c. i My email has no u's. .. |
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 14:00:59 -0500, "Steve Nosko"
wrote: There are already soccer playing robots in development (and playing games in competition) at some universities. You obviously don't watch TV's NOVA. I try not to watch TV at all, if I can help it. Thanks for the update, though. -- "What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793. |
|
"Airy R. Bean" wrote in message ... Ham Radio is what Hams do, and not what the regulatory powers seek to restrict. Radio Hams are technical people. Those who buy radios off-the-shelf, notwithstanding that they may have qualified as Hams are behaving as CBers and are viewed as such. And how technical does one need to be? Enough practical experience to screw up a PL259 correctly? (Note I said correctly and by screw up do not mean fettle.) Enough to know the nature of EM radiation (no heat bands). Enough to understand DSP? Do tell Gareth. Do tell. |
"Airy R. Bean" wrote in message ... I think that you are confusing my wish to preserve Ham Radio as a technical pursuit with your own mental processes which you project so well below. Perhaps it is that you are an unwitting CBer-Masquerading- As-A-Radio-Ham who is annoyed at being "outed" and which annoyance results in you revealing the innermost workings of your psyche as below? It is a very exciting and inspiring thing to continue to educate yourself in all matters of technology - try it and you'll find that there is more to Ham Radio than your own CBisation of it! Be you are a confessed CBer. Remember "some of my best friends" etc. |
"Airy R. Bean" wrote in message ... Not conclusive - golf is for the brain-dead, as are off-the-shelf rigs. Shall we list the off the shelf rigs you have owned? We could highlight the ones you have been unable to maintain- too nervous was it? The other thing that causes brain deaf is drink- Special Brew for example. |
Paul Burridge wrote:
Hi guys, Well do you think it is? I personally can't think of any other passtime accessible to the individual which requires such a high degree of technical knowledge to succeed at. If anyone can think of something more complex, let's hear it! Paul Depends. Other hobbies that require some serious skills: Amateur Telescope Making (lets see you design AND TEST multiple optical surfaces with the reqired tolerance). Home Foundary. Special skills required in safely handling white hot molten metal, and making sand molds. Amateur Rocketry. (Yup this IS rocket science! Im NOT talking Estes here!) Home building aircraft. Besides a pilots licence (to test the final product) the skill to do it right (you going to actually FLY that thing YOURSELF!). Then there was the guy I met in college that built his own SUBMARINE! (he was a scuba diver). BTW, I AM interrested in numbers 1 and 2, and at one time number 4 (but I havn't flown since my 10 year old kids were born). |
On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 18:00:37 -0400, Ken Scharf wrote:
Depends. Other hobbies that require some serious skills: [...] Home Foundary. Special skills required in safely handling white hot molten metal, and making sand molds. With you on that one, I've made plenty of mistakes in amateur radio but learnt a few things along the way. Making mistakes in metal casting is not so forgiving... -- Duncan Munro http://amateur.duncanamps.com/ also http://metal.duncanamps.com/ ! |
On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 23:37:17 +0100, Duncan Munro
wrote: On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 18:00:37 -0400, Ken Scharf wrote: Depends. Other hobbies that require some serious skills: [...] Home Foundary. Special skills required in safely handling white hot molten metal, and making sand molds. With you on that one, I've made plenty of mistakes in amateur radio but learnt a few things along the way. Making mistakes in metal casting is not so forgiving... It doesn't make it any more technical. Or dangerous, for that matter. -- "What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793. |
yes, Andrew, thanks for that note and some very good points... we recently had our annual regional Hamcom 2004 convention, at which I had the chance to catch local microwave and antennas guru Kent Britain's WA5VJB's seminar on microwaves modifications. My favorite was a obsolete cell phone 3 watt output chip that does 18 watts nicely on 13.8 Vdc ;-) All the wi-fi and garage door conversions into microwave transceivers, and the police radar detectors into microwave setups. And how about some of the simple conversions of TV tuners into spectrum analyzer projects? ;-) And the cable TV modules that do all sorts of jobs from preamps to power amps ;-) So I just joined the North Tx Microwave Society to expand beyond the satellite and ATV stuff we are doing now into new areas for our club ;-) so thanks to computer and phone co. surplus, we may have a second generation of surplus conversions to rival those of the 1950s and 1960s for military surplus to amateur radio uses? grins bobm -- ************************************************** ********************* * Robert Monaghan POB 752182 Southern Methodist Univ. Dallas Tx 75275 * ********************Standard Disclaimers Apply************************* |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:03 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com