Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Airy R. Bean wrote:
No, the question is not pointless. Ham Radio is a technical pursuit. If it's not technical for you, then you may be an unwitting CBer-Masquerading-As-A-Radio-Ham In addition to being a technical pursuit, Ham Radio also provides some self-delusional people the opportunity to make precious distinctions between themselves and others in order to provide those self delusionists with a sense of smug superiority. It's just another of the psychological benefits of participating in the hobby. 73, Tom Donaly, KA6RUH |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think that you are confusing my wish to preserve Ham
Radio as a technical pursuit with your own mental processes which you project so well below. Perhaps it is that you are an unwitting CBer-Masquerading- As-A-Radio-Ham who is annoyed at being "outed" and which annoyance results in you revealing the innermost workings of your psyche as below? It is a very exciting and inspiring thing to continue to educate yourself in all matters of technology - try it and you'll find that there is more to Ham Radio than your own CBisation of it! "Tom Donaly" wrote in message . com... Airy R. Bean wrote: No, the question is not pointless. Ham Radio is a technical pursuit. If it's not technical for you, then you may be an unwitting CBer-Masquerading-As-A-Radio-Ham In addition to being a technical pursuit, Ham Radio also provides some self-delusional people the opportunity to make precious distinctions between themselves and others in order to provide those self delusionists with a sense of smug superiority. It's just another of the psychological benefits of participating in the hobby. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Airy R. Bean wrote:
I think that you are confusing my wish to preserve Ham Radio as a technical pursuit with your own mental processes which you project so well below. Perhaps it is that you are an unwitting CBer-Masquerading- As-A-Radio-Ham who is annoyed at being "outed" and which annoyance results in you revealing the innermost workings of your psyche as below? It is a very exciting and inspiring thing to continue to educate yourself in all matters of technology - try it and you'll find that there is more to Ham Radio than your own CBisation of it! "Tom Donaly" wrote in message . com... Airy R. Bean wrote: No, the question is not pointless. Ham Radio is a technical pursuit. If it's not technical for you, then you may be an unwitting CBer-Masquerading-As-A-Radio-Ham In addition to being a technical pursuit, Ham Radio also provides some self-delusional people the opportunity to make precious distinctions between themselves and others in order to provide those self delusionists with a sense of smug superiority. It's just another of the psychological benefits of participating in the hobby. If you're trying to "preserve Ham Radio as a technical pursuit," you won't do it by belittling other's contributions to the hobby. You will however reinforce other's belief that you're just another grouchy, old, British crackpot who is constantly getting exercised over what other people consider trivial matters. On the antenna newsgroup, there's another Briton like yourself who thinks it's of the utmost importance that hams change the name of their SWR meters to "transmitter loading indicators." I expect some day to hear of some Englishman who wants to change the name "spoon" to "pie-hole insertion device." 73, Tom Donaly, KA6RUH |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I haven't belittled anybody's contribution to anything.
Ham Radio is a technical pursuit. CB Radio is a hobby. CBers and CBers-Masquerading-As-Radio-Hams contribute to the hobby of CB and not to the technical pursuit that is Ham Radio. Those who are not technically motivated nor technically qualified are unsuitable as Ham Radio licensees. "Tom Donaly" wrote in message om... Airy R. Bean wrote: I think that you are confusing my wish to preserve Ham Radio as a technical pursuit with your own mental processes which you project so well below. Perhaps it is that you are an unwitting CBer-Masquerading- As-A-Radio-Ham who is annoyed at being "outed" and which annoyance results in you revealing the innermost workings of your psyche as below? It is a very exciting and inspiring thing to continue to educate yourself in all matters of technology - try it and you'll find that there is more to Ham Radio than your own CBisation of it! "Tom Donaly" wrote in message . com... If you're trying to "preserve Ham Radio as a technical pursuit," you won't do it by belittling other's contributions to the hobby. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
quoting:
CBers and CBers-Masquerading-As-Radio-Hams contribute to the hobby of CB and not to the technical pursuit that is Ham Radio. Those who are not technically motivated nor technically qualified are unsuitable as Ham Radio licensees. unquote: you may be right - in Germany (per your path)? But here in the USA, the justification for amateur radio spectrum and existence is called PICON - public interest, convenience, or necessity. The goal is communications at the most basic level. Technical pursuits or qualifications are not a core concern of the licensing body (FCC). You also have to be careful about such issues as "technically qualified", since it requires someone to define who is qualified, what they need to be qualified in, and why ;-) The USA's licensing body (FCC) has defined a rather basic set of core technical competencies for the entry level licenses, and most advanced countries seem to have similar modest technical standards (the old Soviet system may be an exception etc. where you had to build your own radio station?). Now flip thru an RSGB or ARRL handbook, and ask yourself how many of the various modes and bands and projects have _you_ done? ;-) I am still doing new stuff (VLF beacons, modulated lasers for field day's 3 modes credit etc.), which means I am certainly not technically qualified in all the areas of ham radio yet ;-) Plus they keep inventing new ones all the time. in short, if you feel you are "technically competent" in (all of) ham radio, you may not be paying enough attention to all that's going on. ;-) Finally, when the chips are down and ham radio has to prove its value thru emergency communications or whatever, there are lots of very technically competent folks who aren't setup or interested or trained in providing such communications. So the laurels often go to those who some might deride as "appliance operators" who are able to provide such communications. Many of those folks are just as elite and capable in their own areas of ham radio as those with a more technical bent might be in ours... grins bobm -- ************************************************** ********************* * Robert Monaghan POB 752182 Southern Methodist Univ. Dallas Tx 75275 * ********************Standard Disclaimers Apply************************* |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ham Radio is what Hams do, and not what the regulatory
powers seek to restrict. Radio Hams are technical people. Those who buy radios off-the-shelf, notwithstanding that they may have qualified as Hams are behaving as CBers and are viewed as such. "Bob Monaghan" wrote in message ... quoting: CBers and CBers-Masquerading-As-Radio-Hams contribute to the hobby of CB and not to the technical pursuit that is Ham Radio. Those who are not technically motivated nor technically qualified are unsuitable as Ham Radio licensees. unquote: you may be right - in Germany (per your path)? But here in the USA, the justification for amateur radio spectrum and existence is called PICON - public interest, convenience, or necessity. The goal is communications at the most basic level. Technical pursuits or qualifications are not a core concern of the licensing body (FCC). You also have to be careful about such issues as "technically qualified", since it requires someone to define who is qualified, what they need to be qualified in, and why ;-) The USA's licensing body (FCC) has defined a rather basic set of core technical competencies for the entry level licenses, and most advanced countries seem to have similar modest technical standards (the old Soviet system may be an exception etc. where you had to build your own radio station?). Now flip thru an RSGB or ARRL handbook, and ask yourself how many of the various modes and bands and projects have _you_ done? ;-) I am still doing new stuff (VLF beacons, modulated lasers for field day's 3 modes credit etc.), which means I am certainly not technically qualified in all the areas of ham radio yet ;-) Plus they keep inventing new ones all the time. in short, if you feel you are "technically competent" in (all of) ham radio, you may not be paying enough attention to all that's going on. ;-) Finally, when the chips are down and ham radio has to prove its value thru emergency communications or whatever, there are lots of very technically competent folks who aren't setup or interested or trained in providing such communications. So the laurels often go to those who some might deride as "appliance operators" who are able to provide such communications. Many of those folks are just as elite and capable in their own areas of ham radio as those with a more technical bent might be in ours... grins bobm -- ************************************************** ********************* * Robert Monaghan POB 752182 Southern Methodist Univ. Dallas Tx 75275 * ********************Standard Disclaimers Apply************************* |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Airy R. Bean" wrote in message ... Ham Radio is what Hams do, and not what the regulatory powers seek to restrict. Radio Hams are technical people. Those who buy radios off-the-shelf, notwithstanding that they may have qualified as Hams are behaving as CBers and are viewed as such. And how technical does one need to be? Enough practical experience to screw up a PL259 correctly? (Note I said correctly and by screw up do not mean fettle.) Enough to know the nature of EM radiation (no heat bands). Enough to understand DSP? Do tell Gareth. Do tell. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Your resorting to rather silly and childish broadcasting (CB)
in your infantile outbursts below would seem to confirm that you are a CBer. Ham Radio has traditions of international gentlemanly conduct which seem to be lost on you. Sic transit gloria Mundi. This is a "homebrew" NG for _REAL_ Radio Hams. I fear that you and your rants are somewhat out of place herein. "Tom Donaly" wrote in message om... You will however reinforce other's belief that you're just another grouchy, old, British crackpot who is constantly getting exercised over what other people consider trivial matters. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Airy R. Bean wrote:
Your resorting to rather silly and childish broadcasting (CB) in your infantile outbursts below would seem to confirm that you are a CBer. Ham Radio has traditions of international gentlemanly conduct which seem to be lost on you Sic transit gloria Mundi. This is a "homebrew" NG for _REAL_ Radio Hams. I fear that you and your rants are somewhat out of place herein. "Tom Donaly" wrote in message om... You will however reinforce other's belief that you're just another grouchy, old, British crackpot who is constantly getting exercised over what other people consider trivial matters. Well, I'm glad to hear that you're a real Smithfield, Airy, and can look down on those of us non-technicians who don't share your narrow view of Ham Radio. Every hobby needs its share of tin-pot deities to provide comic relief to its other practitioners. Carry on, m'boy. 73, Tom Donaly, KA6RUH |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS Yaesu, Icom, MFJ, Kenwood, Drake, Collins World Ham Clock | Boatanchors | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #632 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #632 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #632 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #632 | Dx |