Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It sounds like a technique I remember calling "controlled carrier". The
carrier power was reduced when you weren't talking, then was increased with the audio in an AGC-like manner. Sounded a little weird, but not badly distorted. The objective was to reduce the average dissipation of the final stage, so smaller tubes and a lighter duty power supply could be used. But I don't see why you'd use a method like this with a low power transmitter, since it's trivial to make one that easily handles the power requirements of standard AM. So I don't really think that's what is meant by "swing". I'd bet good money that whatever "swing" is, it doesn't improve quality or signal strength, and very likely introduces distortion that causes splatter. If the transmitter was designed for 100% modulation of a 4 watt carrier, and you reduce the carrier without a proportional reduction of the audio, you'll be overmodulating and consequently distorting and splattering. What are the supposed benefits of this "swing"? Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Single Sideband FM | Homebrew |