Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reg Edwards wrote:
A TWO-BAND ANTENNA WIRE LOADED WITH AN L & C PARALLEL-TUNED CIRCUIT First of all, Reg, thank you for another simple and useful piece of software! The LC circuit behaves as an ordinary trap at its own resonant frequency which, by experiment, can sometimes be arranged to fall into a third amateur band. But to calculate such a fortunate coincidence is beyond my elderly patience. This comment and some test run of "Not a Trap" intrigued me. I own a 9m fiberglass fishing rod, which I can now transform in a two-band no-tune antenna (ie 40m and 20m). Adding a third band would be really cool. (I originally thought of using your VERTLOAD program to build a two-band vertical, where the coil behaves as a RF high-impedance and the lower "half" of the radiator is 1/4 wavelength at a higher frequency.) From a software point of view a little auto-optimization is needed, which I am about to describe. I would be most grateful if you can either write a notatrap2 or show me the way to produce such an optimization software (I need formulas for computing L and C :-) ). The algorithm. The user enters: maximum available height, wire diameter, minimum and maximum frequency, as now. Then, instead of L-C height, the user enters the desired "bonus" frequency. The order of magnitude of frequencies must obviously be in increasing order: - minimum (ie 7.030 MHz) - maximum (ie 14.060 MHz) - bonus (ie 28.060 MHz) Given the 1/4 wavelength at the bonus frequency, the software computes the L-C height, which is fixed. Then the optimization begins. Starting from the maximum allowable height the software reduces step-by-step (user defined?) the lenght of the upper part. At each step the following are recomputed: - L for minimum freq - C for maximum freq - LC self-resonant freq If the latter is equal/close enough (user defined?) to the bonus frequency, optimization stops and results are shown. Then user can shorten/lengthen the rod in order to fine tune the bonus point of resonance. Did I miss something in the algorithm? 72/73 de Paolo IK1ZYW |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New program "Not a trap" | Antenna | |||
New program "Not a Trap" | Boatanchors | |||
New program "Not a Trap" | Equipment | |||
New program "Not a Trap" | Equipment | |||
New program "Not a Trap" | Equipment |