Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article HbA5d.298202$Lj.253385@fed1read03, " Uncle Peter" wrote:
Car radios (at least back in the tube era) were generally superior to most inexpensive home radios. They included a tuned RF stage which gave them the extra ooomph. The tube auto radios had the antenna as part of the tuned circuit (coupled to the high impedance point of the RF stage), so they worked somewhat like a tuned active antenna. Peter Another reason was the lower IF -- generally 265 kHz vs. the 455 kHz used in home sets. This allowed a more selective IF -- smaller bandwidth for the same Q -- so the adjacent channel interference was cut dow. Some MW [BCB] DXers would use car radios set up for home use for just that reason. Dr. G. "Proctologically Violated©®" wrote in message ... as compared to my home radios/stereos? All-- Have wondered for years why this is so--almost w/o exception, on both AM/FM. On the car NGs, it was suggested that my house was blocking signals, and that the metallic car acted as a big antenna. Neither seems plausible, as my car next to the shop radio (which is terrible) still gets good reception, and that if the metal in a car were so good, you wouldn't need a car antenna. I'm thinking it's the actual electronics. Any opinions/explanations? ---------------------------- Mr. P.V.'d formerly Droll Troll |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS MOTOROLA RADIOS HT1000'S , VISAR'S ,& MAXTRAC'S | Equipment | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications | Equipment | |||
Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications | Equipment | |||
F.S. Radios & Books | Boatanchors |