Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim" wrote in message ...
It has been a couple of years since I have done a noise figure measurement so my brain may be a bit rusty, but I don't see anything wrong with this. Thanks, Jim. I thought I had it right but did want a check from someone with more experience in this field. In fact, if you had a calibrated noise source, this is one of the 'official' methods of measuring noise figure. Ahhh...and therein lies the real problem for most hams. It just occurred to me that there might be another solution to this (at least at HF), which could be to generate noise at an accurately calibrated level (as accurate as the power supply voltage) using a pseudo-random digital signal. 73, Steve VE3SMA |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Need a low noise VXO for narrow sweep | Homebrew | |||
WTB: HP/Agilent 346A (or B) Noise Source for HP 8970A Noise Figure Meter | Homebrew | |||
signal to noise ratio drops on connecting the antenna | Homebrew | |||
Automatic RF noise cancellation and audio noise measurement | Homebrew |