Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 05/08/2017 20:06, rickman wrote:
Yes, because it *is* a PLL. In fact the problem most people have with it is that it doesn't adjust the phase by adjusting the frequency of the slave. It adjusts the *phase* so clearly it *is* a phase locked loop. All pendulums have circular error where the frequency is determined by the amplitude of swing, so for the half cycle where the phase is adjusted by abridging the swing by the hit of the hit and miss stabiliser, the frequency of the slave is, indeed, changed. The standard formula given for the cycle time of pendulums .. 2 * PI * root( L / G) .... is only valid for those small angles where sin( theta ) = theta, and such angles are so infinitesimal that no visible movement of a pendulum would be seen! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WTD: 1 GHz Phase Locked Oscillator | Swap | |||
Sherwood SE-3 MK III D Synchronous High-Fidelity Phase-Locked AM Product Detector | Shortwave | |||
FA: Sherwood Engineering SE-3 HF Phase Locked Detector | Swap | |||
Phase-locked loop filter | Homebrew | |||
Phase-locked loop filter | Homebrew |