Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
K7ITM wrote:
At 50MHz, you should find that metal-oxide resistors will work fine. You're just making a power-wasting pad, not a precision attenuator. (Carbon comps wouldn't be appropriate for precision work, either...) The low-value metal-oxides I've tested on RF component analyzers have all been fine for non-precision applications out to 150MHz. Try, for example, Vishay FP69 series 2W parts or TT/IRC GS-3 series. A couple years ago, I went through my stock of carbon composition resistors and found more than half of them to be out of tolerance at DC. They don't age well at all, even while not dissipating power. The other half of them would probably be out of tolerance too, after having been soldered. I just came across an attempt to use carbon comp resistors (obtained with some difficulty) as RF impedance "standards" - completely hopeless. Small wire-ended metal film resistors would have been just fine, because they don't change value significantly when soldered. Wire-ended metal film resistors can be quite good for RF, but the parasitic inductance can vary. They are made by cutting a spiral track into a basic resistive tube, and the pitch of the spiral is changed to produce a range of resistor values. When the spiral becomes too fine, the process steps up to a higher-resistance 'blank' and the whole cycle starts again with about a one-turn spiral. Thus the number of spiral turns can vary between about 1 and maybe 10. You have to scrape the paint off to see. The inductance can then be estimated using the standard formula based on diameter, number of turns and length, and it varies from a few nH up to maybe 100nH. The problem is that different manufacturers make the steps at different resistance values, so resistors of the same DC value may have very different values of parasitic inductance. If parasitic inductance is critical, circuits that worked perfectly well with one make of resistor may have problems with a different make (as Elecraft recently discovered). 1/8-W SMT resistors are so cheap that you could just use series-parallel combinations of them to get what you need, too. For more serious power dissipation, Caddock (and some others) have power film resistors in TO-220-like packages which are low enough inductance to be quite useful up into VHF and maybe above. Yes, easily. The only problem with the TO220 packages is the shunt capacitance to the grounded tab - and the power dissipation is very low if the tab is not grounded. -- 73 from Ian G/GM3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Wire wound dummy load... | Antenna | |||
Is this voltage doubler different? | Homebrew | |||
Two Shortwave Listener (SWL) 10:1 Baluns for Random Wire Antennas | Swap | |||
RF filters and Impedance Matching | Homebrew | |||
Short STACKED Vertical {Tri-Band} BroomStick Antenna [Was: Wire ant question] | Shortwave |