Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11 Oct 2005 06:00:50 -0700, "Tim Shoppa"
wrote: AM wide 12-16khz Am narrow 6-10khz Maybe it's my aging male ears but I've never heard an AM transmission where a 10kHz filter was needed or even desirable. Whenever I switch on the wider filter I just hear more hiss and static, and no more fidelity. I can hear a small difference between 6kHz, 8kHz, and 10kHz with local AM BCB stations. My preference has always been to abhor hiss so I tend to go towards the narrower side. I don't think my ears are as sensitive to hiss as when I was younger but it still bothers me especially with extended listening. That is because most AM broadcast station use brick wall filters at around 4-5khz. Use to be a time back in the analog days the roll off was both higher and gentler. Of course the Beach Boys surf music was current then. I also listed two AM filters for that reason. Completeness only. Though some of the 75M AM window folks (3885khz) insist that a wide filter is useful. I am told that the 16kc wide filter on my R-390A was used largely for when multiple channels were being multiplexed (e.g. multi-RTTY or multi-voice channels). That may be but AM used ot be much better fidelity at one time. Allison KB!GMX |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How to measure soil constants at HF | Antenna | |||
FA - R. L. Drake SW8 'portable' World Band Shortwave Communications Receiver | Shortwave | |||
Constant bandwidth TRF circuit | Shortwave | |||
a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history | Policy | |||
CCIR Coefficients METHOD 6 REC533 // AUCKLAND --> SEATTLE | Shortwave |