![]() |
BF981 substituting BF964?
I've found that the BF981 is lower noise than the BF964.
Does anyone know if it works as a direct substitute, or would I be asking for trouble if I decided to do this? Sam |
BF981 substituting BF964?
The BF981 is obsolete.
Leon |
BF981 substituting BF964?
What substituted the BF981?
Sam "Leon" wrote in message oups.com... The BF981 is obsolete. Leon |
BF981 substituting BF964?
BF981 is substituted by BF991 of BF996S.
both DG fets are SMD package SOT143 :( BF981 is still widely available, but production stopped. Regards, Willem PE2WDO "Samuel Hunt" schreef in bericht ... What substituted the BF981? Sam "Leon" wrote in message oups.com... The BF981 is obsolete. Leon |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:51 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com