Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I used to have a in-car cell phone system and it had a glass-mount
antenna which didn't require drilling. Basically, there was coax(conntected to the cell) to a plate that stuck to the inside of the rear window. Then on the outside of that window was another plate with the antenna attached to it. You can buy these a radio shack I noticed. I've also seem the same done for XM/Sirius Satellite radio. I have searched and searched and so far have not found the same thing for 2.4 ghz wifi. Does anyone know where I can find one? If not, could it be as simple as removing the cell antenna from the exterior plate(of the radio shack cellular version) and reattaching a 2.4 ghz omni? Or maybe I could modify the existing cell antenna to the correct 1/2 wavelength of 2.4ghz? Your suggestions / help / tips are appreciated. -Kevin |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10 Jan 2006 20:01:17 -0800, "kevincw01" wrote:
I used to have a in-car cell phone system and it had a glass-mount antenna which didn't require drilling. Basically, there was coax(conntected to the cell) to a plate that stuck to the inside of the rear window. Then on the outside of that window was another plate with the antenna attached to it. You can buy these a radio shack I noticed. I've also seem the same done for XM/Sirius Satellite radio. I have searched and searched and so far have not found the same thing for 2.4 ghz wifi. Does anyone know where I can find one? If not, could it be as simple as removing the cell antenna from the exterior plate(of the radio shack cellular version) and reattaching a 2.4 ghz omni? Or maybe I could modify the existing cell antenna to the correct 1/2 wavelength of 2.4ghz? Haven't seen a 2.4G unit, which doesn't mean they aren't out there. But the through-glass coupling is fairly narrowband and incorporates tuning elements. The 800/900 MHz units would present a shocking SWR at 2.4G. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
sorry to have to ask but what is SWR? My guess is sound to [somthing]
ratio? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10 Jan 2006 23:57:15 -0800, "kevincw01" wrote:
sorry to have to ask but what is SWR? My guess is sound to [somthing] ratio? Standing wave ratio. It is a measure of how well (in this case) the antenna system accepts the energy sent to it up the transmission line and radiates it, compared to reflecting it back to the source transmitter. The transmission line should be 50 ohm coax in your case. If the tranmission line/system has serious impedance variation or discontinuity, power is reflected back to the source rather than passing along the line. As the through-glass coupling system employs frequency-sensitive tuned circuit elements, a substantial change in frequency as you suggest will certainly create a serious impedance discontinuity. Overall transmission efficiency pooter- antenna would be very poor as a result. You may well find that a decent 2.4G antenna on the pooter inside the vehicle is more efficient. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
looks like i will have to go that route then since I have (so far) not
come across anything for the 2.4G frequency. Either that or drill a whole in the vehicle. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
says... sorry to have to ask but what is SWR? My guess is sound to [somthing] ratio? Oh dear... Someone didn't pay attention in license class... SWR = Standing Wave Ratio. Put simply, it has to do with how good of a load the antenna presents to the transmitter, and how efficiently it will couple the transmitter's energy to the atmosphere. It needs to be as close to 1:1 as possible. If you're using a wattmeter to measure things, you want to see as low as possible a reading in the 'reflected' mode and as high as possible in the 'forward' mode. Here are some more details. http://www.hamquick.com/tutorial_index.php?id=20 Happy tweaking. -- Dr. Anton T. Squeegee, Director, Dutch Surrealist Plumbing Institute. (Known to some as Bruce Lane, ARS KC7GR, kyrrin (a/t) bluefeathertech[d=o=t]calm -- www.bluefeathertech.com "If Salvador Dali had owned a computer, would it have been equipped with surreal ports?" |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
i have an excused, i dont have a license
![]() |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . com,
says... i have an excused, i dont have a license ![]() Well, hurry up and get one then, silly person! Quick, now! Run and pick up a copy of the ARRL's "Now You're Talking!" or I shall have to taunt you again! Seriously, hamateur radio's a fun hobby, and it gives you an excuse to learn all kinds of neat things about electronics in general, and how it applies to radio in particular. Keep the peace(es). -- Dr. Anton T. Squeegee, Director, Dutch Surrealist Plumbing Institute. (Known to some as Bruce Lane, ARS KC7GR, kyrrin (a/t) bluefeathertech[d=o=t]calm -- www.bluefeathertech.com "If Salvador Dali had owned a computer, would it have been equipped with surreal ports?" |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:33:28 -0800, Dr. Anton T. Squeegee
wrote: In article .com, says... sorry to have to ask but what is SWR? My guess is sound to [somthing] ratio? Oh dear... Someone didn't pay attention in license class... SWR = Standing Wave Ratio. Put simply, it has to do with how good of a load the antenna presents to the transmitter, and how efficiently it will couple the transmitter's energy to the atmosphere. Nothing to do with coupling the Tx energy to the "atmosphere". Terminating the line in a resistor of the line's charactertistic impedance will present a nice SWR and radiate very little. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Grounding | Shortwave | |||
No CounterPoise - Portable Antenna System | Shortwave | |||
significance of feedline orientation | Shortwave | |||
FA: 144/440 dual band glass mount antenna | Swap | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna |