Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joel Kolstad wrote:
"xpyttl" wrote in message ... However, depending on where you are, you can typically only hear WWVB for a small part of the day. Does a bigger antenna help? Or is there just so much more background noise than signal that it's a lost cause? Hmm... isn't the data rate something like 1bps? Maybe they could do some direct sequence spreading at 100Hz or so and improve the link margin a handful of dB... :-) And lose the ability to be used as a frequency standard? -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How to measure soil constants at HF | Antenna | |||
FS: HBR-15 Receiver, Hallicrafters, Heathkit, Millen and Other Goodies | Boatanchors | |||
More Receiver Reviews and Info including 'other' People's WebPages | Shortwave | |||
FA - R. L. Drake SW8 'portable' World Band Shortwave Communications Receiver | Shortwave | |||
a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history | Policy |