LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8   Report Post  
Old January 24th 06, 05:20 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,sci.electronics.design
Michael A. Terrell
 
Posts: n/a
Default WWV receiver

Joel Kolstad wrote:

"xpyttl" wrote in message
...
However, depending on where you are, you can typically only hear WWVB for a
small part of the day.


Does a bigger antenna help? Or is there just so much more background noise
than signal that it's a lost cause?

Hmm... isn't the data rate something like 1bps? Maybe they could do some
direct sequence spreading at 100Hz or so and improve the link margin a handful
of dB... :-)


And lose the ability to be used as a frequency standard?


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to measure soil constants at HF Reg Edwards Antenna 104 June 25th 05 10:46 PM
FS: HBR-15 Receiver, Hallicrafters, Heathkit, Millen and Other Goodies dave Boatanchors 0 April 21st 05 05:04 AM
More Receiver Reviews and Info including 'other' People's WebPages RHF Shortwave 2 January 13th 05 11:58 PM
FA - R. L. Drake SW8 'portable' World Band Shortwave Communications Receiver RHF Shortwave 7 January 4th 05 03:00 AM
a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history john private smith Policy 0 December 22nd 03 02:42 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017