![]() |
Which Crystal Oscillator circuit has lowest jitter
I am fimilar with Colpitts, Harley, Clapps, Bulter, Piece oscillators?
Which configuration with JFET or BJT would yield the highest performance and least jitter? JJ |
Which Crystal Oscillator circuit has lowest jitter
JJ wrote:
I am fimilar with Colpitts, Harley, Clapps, Bulter, Piece oscillators? Which configuration with JFET or BJT would yield the highest performance and least jitter? JJ AFAIK a well-designed Butler oscillator will have the lowest jitter, but I doubt that you could do the "well designed" part without a lot of bench work. Any of the rest (considering a "Clapp" oscillator to mean a crystal oscillator with rubbering) are good enough for communications work. -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com Posting from Google? See http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/ |
Which Crystal Oscillator circuit has lowest jitter
As a generalization, I think that any circuit that excites the crystal's
series resonant mode will probably outperform a circuit that excites the parallel resonant mode, because the series resonance is higher Q and is less affected by external influences. Joe W3JDR "Tim Wescott" wrote in message ... JJ wrote: I am fimilar with Colpitts, Harley, Clapps, Bulter, Piece oscillators? Which configuration with JFET or BJT would yield the highest performance and least jitter? JJ AFAIK a well-designed Butler oscillator will have the lowest jitter, but I doubt that you could do the "well designed" part without a lot of bench work. Any of the rest (considering a "Clapp" oscillator to mean a crystal oscillator with rubbering) are good enough for communications work. -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com Posting from Google? See http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/ |
Which Crystal Oscillator circuit has lowest jitter
Tim Wescott wrote: JJ wrote: I am fimilar with Colpitts, Harley, Clapps, Bulter, Piece oscillators? Which configuration with JFET or BJT would yield the highest performance and least jitter? JJ AFAIK a well-designed Butler oscillator will have the lowest jitter, but I doubt that you could do the "well designed" part without a lot of bench work. Any of the rest (considering a "Clapp" oscillator to mean a crystal oscillator with rubbering) are good enough for communications work. http://www.wescottdesign.com Posting from Google? See http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/ FWIW, ADI recommends a Butler oscillator for use with their DDS chips, for minimum jitter. Leon |
Which Crystal Oscillator circuit has lowest jitter
"Highest performance"? Is that output amplitude? Or minimum startup time? Or startup reliability? Or lowest power requirement? Or what? Jitter, that's a little easier to define but it's usually not the most relevant parameter in radio. It is related to sideband and phase noise and in fact cannot be completely decoupled from either. tor :-) Tim KA0BTD Its not for a radio. I want to minimize the cycle to cycle variations in timing and it should be simple enough to make with 1 or 2 transitors. So not looking for NASA spec stuff, just reliable so it starts every time. JJ |
Which Crystal Oscillator circuit has lowest jitter
JJ wrote:
Its not for a radio. I want to minimize the cycle to cycle variations in timing and it should be simple enough to make with 1 or 2 transitors. So not looking for NASA spec stuff, just reliable so it starts every time. Most reliable to start up you will find are the crystal-oscillator-in-a-can. They also often spec some numbers with respect to jitter. The TCXO-in-a-can or VCTCXO-in-a-can made for telecom use are particularly good bang-for-the-buck if you also want low jitter. Tim. |
Which Crystal Oscillator circuit has lowest jitter
JJ wrote:
"Highest performance"? Is that output amplitude? Or minimum startup time? Or startup reliability? Or lowest power requirement? Or what? Jitter, that's a little easier to define but it's usually not the most relevant parameter in radio. It is related to sideband and phase noise and in fact cannot be completely decoupled from either. tor :-) Tim KA0BTD Its not for a radio. I want to minimize the cycle to cycle variations in timing and it should be simple enough to make with 1 or 2 transitors. So not looking for NASA spec stuff, just reliable so it starts every time. JJ Hi ! Any of those oscillators is OK if resonance circuit Q is kept high and oscillation power in average low level. High Q will guarantee easy and fast starting every time Average low level keeps components cool and cycle to cycle variations are reduced Third important question is loading the oscillator. High impedance FET buffer which is not galvanic ally connected to oscillator is very good solution. The gate of buffer FET can be provided with an "antenna" wire collecting tiny energy from the oscillator resonance circuit. This kind of loose coupling guarantees that effects of external variations are minimized. These principles also guarantee that buffer will amplify 1st order and upper harmonics are powerfully reduced (in oscillator and in first buffer) I have experienced superior results with these guidelines when constructing LC oscillators 73, Risto OH2BT |
Which Crystal Oscillator circuit has lowest jitter
Risto Tiilikainen wrote:
JJ wrote: "Highest performance"? Is that output amplitude? Or minimum startup time? Or startup reliability? Or lowest power requirement? Or what? Jitter, that's a little easier to define but it's usually not the most relevant parameter in radio. It is related to sideband and phase noise and in fact cannot be completely decoupled from either. tor :-) Tim KA0BTD Its not for a radio. I want to minimize the cycle to cycle variations in timing and it should be simple enough to make with 1 or 2 transitors. So not looking for NASA spec stuff, just reliable so it starts every time. JJ Hi ! Any of those oscillators is OK if resonance circuit Q is kept high and oscillation power in average low level. High Q will guarantee easy and fast starting every time Average low level keeps components cool and cycle to cycle variations are reduced Third important question is loading the oscillator. High impedance FET buffer which is not galvanic ally connected to oscillator is very good solution. The gate of buffer FET can be provided with an "antenna" wire collecting tiny energy from the oscillator resonance circuit. This kind of loose coupling guarantees that effects of external variations are minimized. These principles also guarantee that buffer will amplify 1st order and upper harmonics are powerfully reduced (in oscillator and in first buffer) I have experienced superior results with these guidelines when constructing LC oscillators 73, Risto OH2BT HI ! Sorry . I read again your subject. You were asking from crystal oscillators and I began to explain LC oscillators Risto |
Which Crystal Oscillator circuit has lowest jitter
Risto Tiilikainen wrote in
: Hi ! Any of those oscillators is OK if resonance circuit Q is kept high and oscillation power in average low level. High Q will guarantee easy and fast starting every time Average low level keeps components cool and cycle to cycle variations are reduced Third important question is loading the oscillator. 73, Risto OH2BT Good info thanks. What are other crystal series oscillators besides Butler type? JJ |
Which Crystal Oscillator circuit has lowest jitter
If it oscillates it doesn't matter about the type of oscillator
circuit. There's no need to worry yourself. Performance all depends on the cut of the crystal which you have already decided upon without giving it much thought. Just connect it up in the most simple circuit and away you go. ---- Reg. ====================================== |
Which Crystal Oscillator circuit has lowest jitter
JJ wrote:
I am fimilar with Colpitts, Harley, Clapps, Bulter, Piece oscillators? Which configuration with JFET or BJT would yield the highest performance and least jitter? JJ Go get a commercial oscillator. They cost 3 to 10 US $... Yeahhh, sure, square wave... Fixoit it and you know what you can exoect... No more but no less! cheers Dan / M0DFI |
Which Crystal Oscillator circuit has lowest jitter
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:49:06 -0500, JJ wrote:
"Highest performance"? Is that output amplitude? Or minimum startup time? Or startup reliability? Or lowest power requirement? Or what? Jitter, that's a little easier to define but it's usually not the most relevant parameter in radio. It is related to sideband and phase noise and in fact cannot be completely decoupled from either. tor :-) Tim KA0BTD Its not for a radio. I want to minimize the cycle to cycle variations in timing and it should be simple enough to make with 1 or 2 transitors. So not looking for NASA spec stuff, just reliable so it starts every time. JJ Epson makes a low jitter TTL osc. ~3pSec RMS jitter. ~$5 each. 100 MHz. |
Which Crystal Oscillator circuit has lowest jitter
JJ wrote:
Risto Tiilikainen wrote in : Hi ! Any of those oscillators is OK if resonance circuit Q is kept high and oscillation power in average low level. High Q will guarantee easy and fast starting every time Average low level keeps components cool and cycle to cycle variations are reduced Third important question is loading the oscillator. 73, Risto OH2BT Good info thanks. What are other crystal series oscillators besides Butler type? JJ One type not mentioned is the Franklyn, which IIRC is a cross coupled multivibrator with one feedback path through the rock. |
Which Crystal Oscillator circuit has lowest jitter
"Reg Edwards" wrote in news:dt8a26$hs7$1
@nwrdmz03.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com: If it oscillates it doesn't matter about the type of oscillator circuit. There's no need to worry yourself. ---- Reg. ====================================== There is a drop in freq for Pierce and Colpitt after 1 min of startup. Can be 100Hz. Serious enough. JJ |
Which Crystal Oscillator circuit has lowest jitter
There is a drop in freq for Pierce and Colpitt after 1 min of startup. Can
be 100Hz. Serious enough. ------------------------------------- Not true. 100 Hz is a huge variation by crystal standards, especially in the lower frequency ranges. If a crystal oscillator drifts substantially during warmup, it usually implies two things: 1) The oscillator is driving the "so-called" parallel resonance of the crystal, which is very dependent on circuit capacitance. I said "so-called" because the parallel resonance isn't really a true resonance of the quartz, it's a frequency where the crystal appears inductive enough to resonate the combinationo fo the holder capacitance and the circuit capacitance. 2) The circuit is poorly designed. BTW, some here have suggested just purchasing a 'can' oscillator. Be very careful of these, and check the specs carefully. Many 'can' oscillators have an internal programmable RC VCO that is PLL locked to a low frequency crystal. The up-side is that the manufacturer will make any frequency you want (some are even user-programmable). The down side is that RC VCO's have horrible jitter ('phase noise') that isn't corrected by the PLL Joe W3JDR |
Which Crystal Oscillator circuit has lowest jitter
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
JJ wrote: There is a drop in freq for Pierce and Colpitt after 1 min of startup. Can be 100Hz. Serious enough. JJ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Sounds like you're driving the crystal too hard and it's heating up. When something heats it expands and a larger crystal has a lower frequency. If you want best stability, reduce the drive until the circuit barely oscillates and make up the lower output with a stage of amplification. 73, Bill W6WRT |
Which Crystal Oscillator circuit has lowest jitter
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:21:19 GMT, "W3JDR" wrote:
As a generalization, I think that any circuit that excites the crystal's series resonant mode will probably outperform a circuit that excites the parallel resonant mode, because the series resonance is higher Q and is less affected by external influences. Joe, a minor issue. Frerking,"Crystal Oscillator Design and Temperature Compensation" (and a lot of other folks) says the Q of the crystal is: Q = Xl / R, where Xl is the motional inductance and R is the ESR. Thus the Q of the -crystal- is not a function of the mode of operation. Short of drastically changing R, the crystal Q is unaffected by external circuitry. If we speak of overall -circuit- Q then that is a different can of worms. Joe W3JDR "Tim Wescott" wrote in message ... JJ wrote: I am fimilar with Colpitts, Harley, Clapps, Bulter, Piece oscillators? Which configuration with JFET or BJT would yield the highest performance and least jitter? JJ AFAIK a well-designed Butler oscillator will have the lowest jitter, but I doubt that you could do the "well designed" part without a lot of bench work. Any of the rest (considering a "Clapp" oscillator to mean a crystal oscillator with rubbering) are good enough for communications work. -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com Posting from Google? See http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/ |
Which Crystal Oscillator circuit has lowest jitter
JJ wrote:
Epson makes a low jitter TTL osc. ~3pSec RMS jitter. ~$5 each. 100 MHz. Nice specs. Too bad the freqs. are not suitable for me. JJ Hi ! Why do you like to key the oscillator ? Let it run all the time and key the later stage ! 73 , Risto OH2BT |
Which Crystal Oscillator circuit has lowest jitter
"Thus the Q of
the -crystal- is not a function of the mode of operation." ------------------------------ Wes, If you're speaking of the Q of the crystal's inherent series resonance, then you're right. However, most crystal oscillator circuits that we typically see in common use operate in the parallel resonant mode, which isn't a crystal resonance at all. It's the frequency at which the crystal's net inductive reactance resonates the parallel combination of holder capacitance and circuit capacitance. As such, it's quite affected by the circuit around the crystal. When the crystal is operated in a parallel resonant mode as described, the Q of the overall resonant circuit is much lower than the crystal's resonant Q. Joe W3JDR |
Which Crystal Oscillator circuit has lowest jitter
JJ wrote:
There is a drop in freq for Pierce and Colpitt after 1 min of startup. Can be 100Hz. Serious enough. That sounds like crystal heating. All of these oscillators can drive the crystal at various drive levels (depending on resistor and capacitor values and/or tank circuit tapping) and different crystals like different drive levels. A tuning-fork type crystal (e.g. 32kHz watch crystal) is being overdriven if the levels are as high as a microwatt. Most HF-range crystals will take hundreds of microwatts to a few milliwatts of drive. Lots of the oscillator circuits in old handbooks are designed around FT-243 crystals, which can take substantially higher drive levels (sometimes the tube oscillator was putting out several watts) than "modern" crystals. And even then those handbook circuits overdrove the crystals to get more power out of the oscillator! By 1950's standards 100Hz of chirp/drift was not a big deal (was probably better than average for most equipment.) Tim. |
Which Crystal Oscillator circuit has lowest jitter
I haven't read all the replies in this thread, so this may have been
brought up before... Wenzel Associates make some of the lowest phase noise oscillators commonly available, and on their web site you will find information about keeping things low jitter/low phase noise. You will find some simple, practical low noise circuits there, including crystal oscillator circuits. Cheers, Tom |
Which Crystal Oscillator circuit has lowest jitter
....it's Colpitts, Hartley, Clapp,Butler and Pierce!
go with Butler since it has the crystal inserted between points of low impedance, it actually boosts the Q of the crystal above the unloaded Q. this Q is ths single most important source of jitter and attendant phase noise. Saandy 4Z5KS JJ wrote: I am fimilar with Colpitts, Harley, Clapps, Bulter, Piece oscillators? Which configuration with JFET or BJT would yield the highest performance and least jitter? JJ |
Which Crystal Oscillator circuit has lowest jitter
On 22 Feb 2006 07:31:43 -0800, "Saandy , 4Z5KS"
wrote: [snip] it actually boosts the Q of the crystal above the unloaded Q. By what magic does it do this? |
Which Crystal Oscillator circuit has lowest jitter
"Saandy , 4Z5KS" wrote in
oups.com: ...it's Colpitts, Hartley, Clapp,Butler and Pierce! go with Butler since it has the crystal inserted between points of low impedance, it actually boosts the Q of the crystal above the unloaded Q. this Q is ths single most important source of jitter and attendant phase noise. Saandy 4Z5KS Good grief I wrote that rather late at night. Have you seen a simple Butler cct using JFETS? The ARRL one uses a transformer which I rather not use. JJ |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:07 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com