RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Homebrew (https://www.radiobanter.com/homebrew/)
-   -   Input stage for VHF frequency counter in an FPGA? (https://www.radiobanter.com/homebrew/89173-input-stage-vhf-frequency-counter-fpga.html)

[email protected] February 23rd 06 03:01 AM

Input stage for VHF frequency counter in an FPGA?
 
The other day I found myself needing a short gate time ~200 mhz
frequency counter for an automated test, and since I had an FPGA board
on hand I whipped one up quickly. Getting it reading and reporting to
my computer was the easy part.

Ah, the input stage....

I've got about 4dBm of RF into 50 ohms to play with - about a volt p-p
or a little more if it's high-Z. The output of the device under test
has a transformer and then a series cap to create an unbalanced output.


I did something ugly with a 3.3v cmos 7406 varient and a feedback
resistor, which works well enough to get an accurate reading on one
version of the device under test, but not on the other (both have been
verified with real test equipment) It also tends to self-oscillate
with no input...

What would be the right way to do this using on hand parts, such as
abused logic, little 1:1 or 2:1 RF transformers, etc? One idea is to
use another gate with a feedback resistor and cap to ground in the hope
of establishing the threshold level, and then using a transformer to
swing another input above and below this. Most parts on hand are SMD -
which means dead bug construction in SOIC scale under the maginifier -
discourages extensive experimentation.

Why do most abuse-of-logic RF applications seem to use NAND gates
rather than inverters? From a digital perspective NAND gates are a
universal element, but once you tie their inputs together, is there
something to be gained from having two inputs in parallel?

Is there a way to use a differential input configuration on an FPGA to
input a balanced RF signal directly? Theoretically this should be an
FPGA clock input... The device in use currently is an Altera Stratix
II, but a Xilinx S3 kit is available.

If ordering things, what would be a good default low supply voltage
HF/VHF gain component to have on hand? I seem to recall lots of
last-millenium ham designs using the MC1350P video IF amp, but what
would make sense today?


Jim Granville February 23rd 06 03:23 AM

Input stage for VHF frequency counter in an FPGA?
 
wrote:
The other day I found myself needing a short gate time ~200 mhz
frequency counter for an automated test, and since I had an FPGA board
on hand I whipped one up quickly. Getting it reading and reporting to
my computer was the easy part.

Ah, the input stage....


Does the FPGA have LVDS option inputs ?
If it is new enough to have those, they are differential
amplifiers, designed for current mode signals, and will work
with thresholds 1V.
IIRC the LVDS spec has +100mV and -100mV levels.
Normally, they need a common mode bias of just over 1V, and the
better ones will also tolerate rail-rail drive (on ONE ip),
but at reduced speed specs.
-jg


K7ITM February 23rd 06 05:56 AM

Input stage for VHF frequency counter in an FPGA?
 
For gain, have a look at MMICs. Minicircuits sell them in kits that
give you a good range of performance. They're easy to use, and run on
a single supply.

I think the idea of using the LVDS inputs on the FPGA is a good one, if
you can get that into the clock lines you need to use. Otherwise, you
only need a little gain to get to levels you need for logic input. Do
your clock input lines have a bit of hysterisis? Do they have high
enough input impedance to be used with a step-up transformer? Can you
reliably bias the transformer DC return to a point between the
hysterisis trip-points. I suspect you can do a better job with your
logic-gate amplifier, too. Or you could make a fancier input using one
of the very fast comparators.

Cheers,
Tom


John Adair February 23rd 06 07:30 AM

Input stage for VHF frequency counter in an FPGA?
 
As Jim has said LVDS is a good way. Just watch the common mode input range.
You can use a RF transformer to rebias the DC level to get arround any
issues.

Another way is to use a single ended standard like SSTL and DC bias the
input to the reference voltage used for the SSTL. You do need to have access
to Vref pins on the Spartan-3 to use this technique.

We have support for LVDS and SSTL in our boards but I am not sure about the
Spartan-3 starter kit.

John Adair
Enterpoint Ltd. - Home of Raggedstone1. The low Cost Spartan-3 Development
Board.
http://www.enterpoint.co.uk

wrote in message
oups.com...
The other day I found myself needing a short gate time ~200 mhz
frequency counter for an automated test, and since I had an FPGA board
on hand I whipped one up quickly. Getting it reading and reporting to
my computer was the easy part.

Ah, the input stage....

I've got about 4dBm of RF into 50 ohms to play with - about a volt p-p
or a little more if it's high-Z. The output of the device under test
has a transformer and then a series cap to create an unbalanced output.


I did something ugly with a 3.3v cmos 7406 varient and a feedback
resistor, which works well enough to get an accurate reading on one
version of the device under test, but not on the other (both have been
verified with real test equipment) It also tends to self-oscillate
with no input...

What would be the right way to do this using on hand parts, such as
abused logic, little 1:1 or 2:1 RF transformers, etc? One idea is to
use another gate with a feedback resistor and cap to ground in the hope
of establishing the threshold level, and then using a transformer to
swing another input above and below this. Most parts on hand are SMD -
which means dead bug construction in SOIC scale under the maginifier -
discourages extensive experimentation.

Why do most abuse-of-logic RF applications seem to use NAND gates
rather than inverters? From a digital perspective NAND gates are a
universal element, but once you tie their inputs together, is there
something to be gained from having two inputs in parallel?

Is there a way to use a differential input configuration on an FPGA to
input a balanced RF signal directly? Theoretically this should be an
FPGA clock input... The device in use currently is an Altera Stratix
II, but a Xilinx S3 kit is available.

If ordering things, what would be a good default low supply voltage
HF/VHF gain component to have on hand? I seem to recall lots of
last-millenium ham designs using the MC1350P video IF amp, but what
would make sense today?




Hal Murray February 23rd 06 09:52 AM

Input stage for VHF frequency counter in an FPGA?
 

I did something ugly with a 3.3v cmos 7406 varient and a feedback
resistor, which works well enough to get an accurate reading on one
version of the device under test, but not on the other (both have been
verified with real test equipment) It also tends to self-oscillate
with no input...


7406 is open collector. Did you mean 7404?

What size feedback resistor? What sort of oscillations?

I've had reasonable luck with that sort of hacking. Not great.

What's the output of your gate look like? Is it cleanly switching
or struggling to switch at that speed?

You might want to skip the external gate and use an inverter
in the FPGA out to a feedback pin. That gets the feedback
covering the input pin that you are really interested in.


--
The suespammers.org mail server is located in California. So are all my
other mailboxes. Please do not send unsolicited bulk e-mail or unsolicited
commercial e-mail to my suespammers.org address or any of my other addresses.
These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's. I hate spam.


Joseph2k February 23rd 06 10:58 AM

Input stage for VHF frequency counter in an FPGA?
 
wrote:

The other day I found myself needing a short gate time ~200 mhz
frequency counter for an automated test, and since I had an FPGA board
on hand I whipped one up quickly. Getting it reading and reporting to
my computer was the easy part.

Ah, the input stage....

I've got about 4dBm of RF into 50 ohms to play with - about a volt p-p
or a little more if it's high-Z. The output of the device under test
has a transformer and then a series cap to create an unbalanced output.


I did something ugly with a 3.3v cmos 7406 varient and a feedback
resistor, which works well enough to get an accurate reading on one
version of the device under test, but not on the other (both have been
verified with real test equipment) It also tends to self-oscillate
with no input...

What would be the right way to do this using on hand parts, such as
abused logic, little 1:1 or 2:1 RF transformers, etc? One idea is to
use another gate with a feedback resistor and cap to ground in the hope
of establishing the threshold level, and then using a transformer to
swing another input above and below this. Most parts on hand are SMD -
which means dead bug construction in SOIC scale under the maginifier -
discourages extensive experimentation.

Why do most abuse-of-logic RF applications seem to use NAND gates
rather than inverters? From a digital perspective NAND gates are a
universal element, but once you tie their inputs together, is there
something to be gained from having two inputs in parallel?


the only gain is some PWB layout simplifications and less wasted part
sections.


Is there a way to use a differential input configuration on an FPGA to
input a balanced RF signal directly? Theoretically this should be an
FPGA clock input... The device in use currently is an Altera Stratix
II, but a Xilinx S3 kit is available.

If ordering things, what would be a good default low supply voltage
HF/VHF gain component to have on hand? I seem to recall lots of
last-millenium ham designs using the MC1350P video IF amp, but what
would make sense today?

I am thinking on the order of a single transistor amplifier to go to logic
levels, then characterize it for delay issues.
--
JosephKK
Gegen dummheit kampfen Die Gotter Selbst, vergebens.
--Shiller

Fred Bloggs February 23rd 06 11:15 AM

Input stage for VHF frequency counter in an FPGA?
 
... but what
would make sense today?


http://www.onsemi.com/PowerSolutions...=MC100EPT21DR2


Jan Panteltje February 23rd 06 01:06 PM

Input stage for VHF frequency counter in an FPGA?
 
On a sunny day (22 Feb 2006 19:01:44 -0800) it happened
wrote in .com:

The other day I found myself needing a short gate time ~200 mhz
frequency counter for an automated test, and since I had an FPGA board
on hand I whipped one up quickly. Getting it reading and reporting to
my computer was the easy part.

Just a partial reply... I think 7400 series should stop way below 200mHz,
perhaps 50MHz?

I would make a small diff amplifier, did something 40 years ago (yes 40!)
with I think it was BFY90 transistors, then invert with 2 more and drive
the LVDS input.

-------------------------------- +5 or + 12
| | |
[ ] [ ] [ ] R4
| |------------ __|__
|-----|-------- | | |
|/ \| | | |/e \|
---| NPN |---- | |----| |---
in |\ e / |bias2 | |\ PNP /| |
|___| | | | |
| ---------|-----|----
| / | |
---| |---- |----------- LVDS +
bias | \ | |----------- LVDS -
| | |
[ ] [ ] [ ]
| | R5 | R6
---------------------------------------------- GND


R4 could be a current source too, set it so it is guaranteed that
the voltage across R5 and R6 (max i in one leg) cannot exceed FPGA
max in.

Gives you some input protection
The 'bias voltages can be generated with diode drop.
No time now to enter it in spice to get response.....
You can use simple junction FETS for the first stage too.

There are also nice chips, but transistors I have always in the box.


[email protected] February 23rd 06 02:49 PM

Input stage for VHF frequency counter in an FPGA?
 
Jan Panteltje wrote:

Just a partial reply... I think 7400 series should stop way below 200mHz,
perhaps 50MHz?


It's either a 74AC04 or possibly a 74HC04 (it's upside down so I can't
tell) and it's self oscillating at 294 mhz - (it's stable enough for
the counter to read... a fast scope shows it approximately as a
sinewave.

It seems to be oscillating at about 1/tpd... can't even really pull it
much with finger capacitance - only about 10 mhz.

Interestingly, if I short a the floating input-output pair of an unused
inverter with the scope probe, that runs a bit slower around 260 mhz...
wheras the gate in use has about 20k of resistance in the feedback
path.

I would make a small diff amplifier, did something 40 years ago (yes 40!)
with I think it was BFY90 transistors, then invert with 2 more and drive
the LVDS input.


I may give your transistor circuit a try, either with components or
simulation, thanks.


Spehro Pefhany February 23rd 06 03:14 PM

Input stage for VHF frequency counter in an FPGA?
 
On 23 Feb 2006 06:49:32 -0800, the renowned
wrote:

Jan Panteltje wrote:

Just a partial reply... I think 7400 series should stop way below 200mHz,
perhaps 50MHz?


It's either a 74AC04 or possibly a 74HC04 (it's upside down so I can't
tell) and it's self oscillating at 294 mhz - (it's stable enough for
the counter to read... a fast scope shows it approximately as a
sinewave.

It seems to be oscillating at about 1/tpd... can't even really pull it
much with finger capacitance - only about 10 mhz.

Interestingly, if I short a the floating input-output pair of an unused
inverter with the scope probe, that runs a bit slower around 260 mhz...
wheras the gate in use has about 20k of resistance in the feedback
path.

I would make a small diff amplifier, did something 40 years ago (yes 40!)
with I think it was BFY90 transistors, then invert with 2 more and drive
the LVDS input.


I may give your transistor circuit a try, either with components or
simulation, thanks.



What about using a stand-alone LVDS receiver? Eg. Pericom
PI90LV179W.


Tim Shoppa February 23rd 06 03:23 PM

Input stage for VHF frequency counter in an FPGA?
 
wrote:
The other day I found myself needing a short gate time ~200 mhz
frequency counter for an automated test, and since I had an FPGA board
on hand I whipped one up quickly. Getting it reading and reporting to
my computer was the easy part.

Ah, the input stage....

I've got about 4dBm of RF into 50 ohms to play with - about a volt p-p
or a little more if it's high-Z. The output of the device under test
has a transformer and then a series cap to create an unbalanced output.


I did something ugly with a 3.3v cmos 7406 varient and a feedback
resistor, which works well enough to get an accurate reading on one
version of the device under test, but not on the other (both have been
verified with real test equipment) It also tends to self-oscillate
with no input...


I'm surprised any CMOS 7406 variant really goes to 200MHz! I think you
got lucky with the one that did work.

What would be the right way to do this using on hand parts, such as
abused logic, little 1:1 or 2:1 RF transformers, etc?


I like high-speed comparators (often called "differential receivers" or
"LVDS receivers" on the spec sheet) for this.

One idea is to
use another gate with a feedback resistor and cap to ground in the hope
of establishing the threshold level, and then using a transformer to
swing another input above and below this. Most parts on hand are SMD -
which means dead bug construction in SOIC scale under the maginifier -
discourages extensive experimentation.


The nice thing about differential receivers a

1. Easy to set the comparison level.
2. Lowish input impedance but not too low, such that you set the
impedance by putting a 50 or 100 or whatever ohm resistor there.
3. At least for the non-LVDS parts, there's only one or two receivers
per package so even when it's not SMD it's easy to do dead-bug
prototyping.
4. They already have some semblance of defined open-circuit response
(usually called "fail-safe" for some bizarre reason in the spec sheets)
to prevent oscillating.

Why do most abuse-of-logic RF applications seem to use NAND gates
rather than inverters? From a digital perspective NAND gates are a
universal element, but once you tie their inputs together, is there
something to be gained from having two inputs in parallel?


Usually the hex inverter packages cost a little bit more than the
4xNAND gate packages. It's nice to have the extra input to act as an
enable etc. And once you start running these parts into the linear
region you probably do not really trust using the other sections for
other functions.

Is there a way to use a differential input configuration on an FPGA to
input a balanced RF signal directly? Theoretically this should be an
FPGA clock input... The device in use currently is an Altera Stratix
II, but a Xilinx S3 kit is available.


You can even feed in non-balanced RF subject to some limitations.

If ordering things, what would be a good default low supply voltage
HF/VHF gain component to have on hand? I seem to recall lots of
last-millenium ham designs using the MC1350P video IF amp, but what
would make sense today?


VHF? MMIC's, at least as long as you have only need for AC coupling.

Tim.


[email protected] February 23rd 06 10:54 PM

Input stage for VHF frequency counter in an FPGA?
 
From: on Wed, Feb 22 2006 7:01 pm

The other day I found myself needing a short gate time ~200 mhz
frequency counter for an automated test, and since I had an FPGA board
on hand I whipped one up quickly. Getting it reading and reporting to
my computer was the easy part.

Ah, the input stage....

I've got about 4dBm of RF into 50 ohms to play with - about a volt p-p
or a little more if it's high-Z. The output of the device under test
has a transformer and then a series cap to create an unbalanced output.


snip

If you want some good results, use a high-speed comparator
device. The Maxim MAX9010 family of comparators is fast
(5 nSec propagation delay) and it works into a TTL load.

At 1 V p-p you've got the input overdrive to insure fast
rise and fall times of the output. Note: 200 MHz (if that
is really what you wanted to write) has a period of 5 nSec
so even this very fast comparator is going to be pushed for
a good output. On the other hand it is STABLE and won't
"go into oscillation with no input."

http://www.maxim-ic.com

Samples are available. One in the family is in a SOT23
package, the rest smaller.


If ordering things, what would be a good default low supply voltage
HF/VHF gain component to have on hand? I seem to recall lots of
last-millenium ham designs using the MC1350P video IF amp, but what
would make sense today?


The MC1350P is second-sourced by Lansdale. It is still a very
good differential in/out building block with good AGC control.
The MC1349P is a pin/function equivalent and can be ordered from
Dieter Gentzow's PartsAndKits.com at 3 for $3. Same place is a
good source of small-quantity toroidal cores. Both ICs are
called out with 12 VDC supplies but they will work down to
9 VDC with little degredation. Open-collector outputs, constant
5 KOhm || 5 pFd input, AGC control down to 60 db (if needed).




Chris Jones February 23rd 06 11:36 PM

Input stage for VHF frequency counter in an FPGA?
 
wrote:

Jan Panteltje wrote:

Just a partial reply... I think 7400 series should stop way below 200mHz,
perhaps 50MHz?


It's either a 74AC04 or possibly a 74HC04 (it's upside down so I can't
tell) and it's self oscillating at 294 mhz - (it's stable enough for
the counter to read... a fast scope shows it approximately as a
sinewave.

It seems to be oscillating at about 1/tpd... can't even really pull it
much with finger capacitance - only about 10 mhz.

Interestingly, if I short a the floating input-output pair of an unused
inverter with the scope probe, that runs a bit slower around 260 mhz...
wheras the gate in use has about 20k of resistance in the feedback
path.

I would make a small diff amplifier, did something 40 years ago (yes 40!)
with I think it was BFY90 transistors, then invert with 2 more and drive
the LVDS input.


I may give your transistor circuit a try, either with components or
simulation, thanks.


There are some newer low voltage CMOS gates that are much faster than AC
series, I think they are called LVC and a few other names depending on the
manufacturer. The really fast ones don't support 5V supply operation
because they are made on a fine geometry process. This also makes them
faster. It would be very hard to stop it from self oscillating with no
input signal. In order to have a meaningful way of determining if you have
satisfied this requirement for not self-oscillating, you would first have
to define what is the minimum input amplitude that you expect it to be able
to accept and produce an output with reasonable duty cycle etc. Another
approach would be to make an input buffer that does self oscillate and make
a separate detector that measures the input signal amplitude and disables
the measurement when the input amplitude is below a certain threshold.

Chris

Chris

[email protected] February 24th 06 01:26 AM

Input stage for VHF frequency counter in an FPGA?
 
Fred Bloggs wrote:
... but what
would make sense today?


http://www.onsemi.com/PowerSolutions...=MC100EPT21DR2


That sounds like a good idea, because theoretically we actually have
some on hand somewhere, I'll have to see if I can scare them up.

While connecting to the FPGA directly would be simpler, I do like the
idea of using an external chip as a bit of a 'fuse'. (Though
transformer coupling into the FPGA should reduce some risk)


John Larkin February 24th 06 04:12 AM

Input stage for VHF frequency counter in an FPGA?
 
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 16:23:13 +1300, Jim Granville
wrote:

wrote:
The other day I found myself needing a short gate time ~200 mhz
frequency counter for an automated test, and since I had an FPGA board
on hand I whipped one up quickly. Getting it reading and reporting to
my computer was the easy part.

Ah, the input stage....


Does the FPGA have LVDS option inputs ?
If it is new enough to have those, they are differential
amplifiers, designed for current mode signals, and will work
with thresholds 1V.
IIRC the LVDS spec has +100mV and -100mV levels.
Normally, they need a common mode bias of just over 1V, and the
better ones will also tolerate rail-rail drive (on ONE ip),
but at reduced speed specs.
-jg


Second that. We've tested the Xilinx Spartan3 LVDS inputs and they are
excellent, super-fast comparators.

John


[email protected] February 25th 06 05:11 AM

Input stage for VHF frequency counter in an FPGA?
 
wrote:
Fred Bloggs wrote:
... but what
would make sense today?


http://www.onsemi.com/PowerSolutions...=MC100EPT21DR2

That sounds like a good idea, because theoretically we actually have
some on hand somewhere, I'll have to see if I can scare them up.


Found one and wired it up as the datasheet suggests - cap coupled input
to half the differential pair, the other side floating at the reference
output pin voltage with decoupling cap to ground, terminating resistor
across the pair. Worked quite well.

The xilinx S3 kit from digilent doesn't seem to be designed with using
the differential input capability as the pairs are split up all over
the place. Not certain that I couldn't bias one input of a pair as a
reference wherever it is and drive the other pin wherever that is, but
putting it all in a little package seemed simpler.


Hal Murray February 25th 06 07:05 PM

Input stage for VHF frequency counter in an FPGA?
 

http://www.onsemi.com/PowerSolutions...=MC100EPT21DR2


Be sure to check the output with a scope.

Years ago, I used a PECL=TTL part. That was real/old, 5V TTL.
The problem was that I really wanted a CMOS output and what I
got was a TTL signal that only went up to 4V or so. We had to
run it through an AC dead-bug to get what we wanted.

--
The suespammers.org mail server is located in California. So are all my
other mailboxes. Please do not send unsolicited bulk e-mail or unsolicited
commercial e-mail to my suespammers.org address or any of my other addresses.
These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's. I hate spam.


[email protected] February 25th 06 07:20 PM

Input stage for VHF frequency counter in an FPGA?
 
Hal Murray wrote:
http://www.onsemi.com/PowerSolutions...=MC100EPT21DR2


Be sure to check the output with a scope.

Years ago, I used a PECL=TTL part. That was real/old, 5V TTL.
The problem was that I really wanted a CMOS output and what I
got was a TTL signal that only went up to 4V or so. We had to
run it through an AC dead-bug to get what we wanted.


Good point to keep in mind. In this case though it's all 3.3v
families, and LVTTL seems to have nearly the same Vih/Vil spec as
LVCMOS. The part is spec'd with minimum Voh of 2.4v.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com