Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does anyone have any idaes on how to lower the nf in a uhf preamp?
|
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
" wrote: Does anyone have any idaes on how to lower the nf in a uhf preamp? 1. Lower then temprature of the device, by dumping it in Liquid Nitrogen. 2. Use a device with a lower Noise Figure, as the active element. Daaa..... |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
3a. Tune (match) the input for lowest in-system noise figure.
This is in general not a match for maximum power transfer. 3b. Be sure the active device(s) is/are biased for optimum noise figu collector/drain voltage and standing current. 4. Be sure there are not any unnecessary noise contributions from components other than the active devices in the amplifier. If you want to consider the system as a whole, 4. Lower the loss between the antenna and the preamp (eliminate feedline, for example). 5. Be sure that the preamp has enough gain that it sensibly sets the system noise figure. (Be sure that its gain gets the signal seen at the next stage high enough that the next stage contributes insignificant noise to the system.) .... etc. But beware of trading other things for noise figu beware of poor intermod or desense performance, for example. Cheers, "Me" aka Tom "You" wrote: In article .com, " wrote: Does anyone have any idaes on how to lower the nf in a uhf preamp? 1. Lower then temprature of the device, by dumping it in Liquid Nitrogen. 2. Use a device with a lower Noise Figure, as the active element. Daaa..... |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
As a point of reference, a typical NE3508M04
(http://www.cel.com/pdf/datasheets/ne3508m04.pdf) can give you a device noise figure under 0.4dB, operated at room temperature, at any frequency across the entire "UHF" frequency range (300MHz to 3GHz)--better than that at the lower end of the frequency range. Cheers, Tom |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the website, my problem was i had a factory cellular preamp
from surplus equipment, it had a ceramic filter on the input set 824-850 mhz. When i removed the filter the noise figure was terrible but the bandwith very wide, im trying to get it to operate in the 33cm band with decent noise figure. The only thing i can figure is that by removing the banpass filter i raised the NF? |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
"K7ITM" wrote: As a point of reference, a typical NE3508M04 (http://www.cel.com/pdf/datasheets/ne3508m04.pdf) can give you a device noise figure under 0.4dB, operated at room temperature, at any frequency across the entire "UHF" frequency range (300MHz to 3GHz)--better than that at the lower end of the frequency range. Cheers, Tom Nothing like a Ruby Maser dumped in Liquid Nitrogen and pumped at -12 DBm to bring in those extremely small signals........ all it takes is cold...... |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Im guessing at the noise figure, im running a low level 1mv fr0m a
cushman service monitor to the preamp input. Im using a uniden 898t scanner as a receiver because it has a digital S meter. When i turn on the preamp jumps up 3-4 bars but the modulation tone stays the same volume level. By this im guessing the noise level has increased, the preamp had a ceramic filter with the 50ohm input going directly into it and its output thur cap to the 1st amp, the seller on ebay said just remove the filter and move the input to the filters output trace, thats what i done but results are poor even thou this is a commercial preamp pulled from analog cell site. It looks to be a very well made preamp so it should work if i figure out the input match? |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You wrote:
In article .com, "K7ITM" wrote: As a point of reference, a typical NE3508M04 (http://www.cel.com/pdf/datasheets/ne3508m04.pdf) can give you a device noise figure under 0.4dB, operated at room temperature, at any frequency across the entire "UHF" frequency range (300MHz to 3GHz)--better than that at the lower end of the frequency range. Cheers, Tom Nothing like a Ruby Maser dumped in Liquid Nitrogen and pumped at -12 DBm to bring in those extremely small signals........ all it takes is cold... It still takes cold but InP HEMTs perform much better than ruby masers these days... "Extremely Low-Noise Amplification with Cryogenic FET's and HFET's: 1970-2004" http://www.gb.nrao.edu/electronics/edir/edir314.pdf Happy reading! -Galen, W8LNA |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
PreAmp Noise Figure of the GRE preamps. | Scanner | |||
Noise Figure Measurements | Homebrew | |||
Icom 746pro Testimonial | Shortwave | |||
Automatic RF noise cancellation and audio noise measurement | Homebrew | |||
CCIR Coefficients METHOD 6 REC533 // AUCKLAND --> SEATTLE | Shortwave |