RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Homebrew (https://www.radiobanter.com/homebrew/)
-   -   Identifying Surplus Toroid Material (https://www.radiobanter.com/homebrew/95453-identifying-surplus-toroid-material.html)

[email protected] May 28th 06 11:12 PM

Identifying Surplus Toroid Material
 
I was rummaging around for a core for a small switching power supply
and came across some 1.00" OD, 0.55" ID, 0.39" high (25x14x10 mm)
toroids. A 50 turn coil measures about 1 mH (by measuring resonance at
200-500 kHz). This appears to indicate a permeability around 600, by
comparing it with various catalogues. But the Q is rather low
(equivalent series resistance is roughly 250 ohms at 500 kHz and 120
ohms at 200 kHz). Doesn't look likely to be good enough for a
switching supply, so they may have to be relegated to EMI jobs (which I
seem to recall they were used for in a piece of equipment I took
apart).

But does anyone have any idea what material they might be ? Doesn't at
first glance appear to be anything similar to what Fair-Rite makes.
There's a good chance it is of Asian origin, I think.

73,
Steve VE3SMA


Alan Peake May 31st 06 08:31 AM

Identifying Surplus Toroid Material
 


wrote:
I was rummaging around for a core for a small switching power supply
and came across some 1.00" OD, 0.55" ID, 0.39" high (25x14x10 mm)
toroids. A 50 turn coil measures about 1 mH (by measuring resonance
at 200-500 kHz). This appears to indicate a permeability around 600,
by comparing it with various catalogues. But the Q is rather low
(equivalent series resistance is roughly 250 ohms at 500 kHz and 120
ohms at 200 kHz). Doesn't look likely to be good enough for a
switching supply, so they may have to be relegated to EMI jobs (which
I seem to recall they were used for in a piece of equipment I took
apart).

But does anyone have any idea what material they might be ? Doesn't
at first glance appear to be anything similar to what Fair-Rite
makes. There's a good chance it is of Asian origin, I think.

73, Steve VE3SMA

Steve, the usual reason for the apparent low Q is that it is not being
measured at the frequency that will give highest Q. Try fewer turns and
higher frequencies as a first attempt. I've measured many cores this
way. If you like, I can email you an XL spreadsheet with the all the
cores I've measured so far. Switchmode cores seems to have
permeabilities quite a bit higher than 600.
Alan
VK2ADB


Mike Monett June 5th 06 07:58 AM

Identifying Surplus Toroid Material
 
Alan Peake wrote:

Steve, the usual reason for the apparent low Q is that it is not being
measured at the frequency that will give highest Q. Try fewer turns and
higher frequencies as a first attempt. I've measured many cores this
way. If you like, I can email you an XL spreadsheet with the all the
cores I've measured so far. Switchmode cores seems to have
permeabilities quite a bit higher than 600.
Alan
VK2ADB


Alan, are the ferrite toroids used to filter the output of pc power
supplies or the ac input of microwave ovens useful for other applications?

Or is the ferrite material lossy like the small ferrite beads used for emi
reduction on wires?

Regards,

Mike Monett

Alan Peake June 6th 06 09:14 AM

Identifying Surplus Toroid Material
 


Alan, are the ferrite toroids used to filter the output of pc power
supplies or the ac input of microwave ovens useful for other applications?

The PC PSU filter toroids seem to be optimized for the 25KHz -85KHz
range so any applications you have for this frequency range could use
them. Similarly, the AC input to the oven is probably 50/60HZ so those
toroids would be better at the lower audio frequencies.

Or is the ferrite material lossy like the small ferrite beads used for emi
reduction on wires?

Not quite sure about beads - ordinary ferrite material has fairly
constant permeability up to a frequency determined by the ferrite mix,
then drops off. Beads tend to have an impedance peak at some desired
frequency range - e.g. 100-200MHz
Alan


Mike Monett June 6th 06 09:31 AM

Identifying Surplus Toroid Material
 
Alan Peake wrote:

The PC PSU filter toroids seem to be optimized for the 25KHz -85KHz
range so any applications you have for this frequency range could use
them. Similarly, the AC input to the oven is probably 50/60HZ so those
toroids would be better at the lower audio frequencies.

Not quite sure about beads - ordinary ferrite material has fairly
constant permeability up to a frequency determined by the ferrite mix,
then drops off. Beads tend to have an impedance peak at some desired
frequency range - e.g. 100-200MHz
Alan


Thanks very much - that encourages me to try them and see how well
they perform.

Regards,

Mike Monett

Reg Edwards June 6th 06 10:57 AM

Identifying Surplus Toroid Material
 
Ferrites have as many vices as they have virtues.

Ferrite salesmen cleverly make virtues out of vices.



Highland Ham June 6th 06 12:49 PM

Identifying Surplus Toroid Material
 
Reg Edwards wrote:
Ferrites have as many vices as they have virtues.

Ferrite salesmen cleverly make virtues out of vices.

================================================
But an electronics 'homebrewer' can find out characteristics anyway ,
through experimentation.

Frank GM0CSZ / KN6WH

Reg Edwards June 6th 06 07:09 PM

Identifying Surplus Toroid Material
 

Reg Edwards wrote:
Ferrites have as many vices as they have virtues.

Ferrite salesmen cleverly make virtues out of vices.

================================================
But an electronics 'homebrewer' can find out characteristics anyway

,
through experimentation.

Frank GM0CSZ / KN6WH

====================================

Only if he has first-class laboratory facilities.

And samples vary widely in their characteristics, one from another.

The best way of using one is to wind some wire on it. If it works in
your particular circuit then consider yourself lucky.
----
Reg.



Roy Lewallen June 6th 06 07:31 PM

Identifying Surplus Toroid Material
 
Reg Edwards wrote:
Reg Edwards wrote:
Ferrites have as many vices as they have virtues.

Ferrite salesmen cleverly make virtues out of vices.

================================================
But an electronics 'homebrewer' can find out characteristics anyway

,
through experimentation.

Frank GM0CSZ / KN6WH

====================================

Only if he has first-class laboratory facilities.

And samples vary widely in their characteristics, one from another.

The best way of using one is to wind some wire on it. If it works in
your particular circuit then consider yourself lucky.


It's not nearly as bad as Reg says, and a surprising response from
someone who measures ground conductivity to great depths in a kitchen sink.

An antenna analyzer hardly qualifies as "first-class laboratory
facilities", yet it can quickly show you the impedance and Q of an
inductor wound on a core at any frequency within its range. If
saturation with DC is a problem, the impedance can be measured while DC
is passed through another winding from a source having a high impedance
at RF. And samples of cores are typically alike in basic characteristics
within a few percent.

Ferrites are more commonly used at RF for wideband transformers and EMI
suppression than for high-Q inductors. In those applications, minimum
impedance magnitude is usually the criterion rather than Q or having a
precise value. So even a rough approximation of impedance is usually all
that's required. The magnitude of impedance can be measured with a
variety of simple means in addition to an antenna analyzer. Only in
those applications where a high Q inductor is required, usually at low
frequencies, are better measurements required.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

Reg Edwards June 7th 06 12:18 AM

Identifying Surplus Toroid Material
 
There is a coil.
It is 1" in diameter.
It is 2" long.
It has 20 turns.

How accurately can coil Q be determined at 30 MHz?

(1) Using an Autec antenna analyser?
(2) Using the best commercially available instrument.
----
Reg.




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com