Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
PRB-1 and CCNR's
KC4UAI wrote:
There simply are no similar houses in the area that would not have CCNRs where I could relocate to. CC&Rs are a part of the price one pays for a house and I, for one, am not willing to pay a price that prohibits amateur radio antennas. That price is just too high. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
PRB-1 and CCNR's
On Mar 17, 11:01 am, Cecil Moore wrote:
KC4UAI wrote: There simply are no similar houses in the area that would not have CCNRs where I could relocate to. CC&Rs are a part of the price one pays for a house and I, for one, am not willing to pay a price that prohibits amateur radio antennas. That price is just too high. But you may have the option to choose a house without them. I don't feel that I do at this point. It's not within my means within reasonable commute from where I work. I guess this doesn't have too much traction with the ham radio folks doe to the demographics involved. The Average ham is older than I am, with more options both financially and geographically than I have. They are more likely to be established in situations where they are not effected by deed restrictions, or have better options than I do. That doesn't mean that this issue is not important. I believe that it is very important to the future of the amateur radio service, right up there with defending the spectrum we have if not directly related to this issue. -= bob =- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
PRB-1 and CCNR's
KC4UAI wrote:
But you may have the option to choose a house without them. I don't feel that I do at this point. It's not within my means within reasonable commute from where I work. When I lived in AZ, I chose a two hour per day commute rather than antenna restrictions. Heck, I got in a lot of operating time during that two hours per day. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|