Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... On Mar 15, 11:38�pm, John Smith I wrote: wrote: [snip] PSK is too slow for data transmission of LARGE and multi-megabyte amounts of data, end of story. Not the end of the story at all. Yes, PSK31 is too slow for large amounts of data - because it wasn't designed for that. PSK31 was designed to be a keyboard-to-keyboard mode that uses very little bandwidth and has excellent performance with low S/N ratios. It was meant as an improvement to FSK RTTY for such QSOs. My question on this is why would we be sending large amounts of data on amateur radio? The need for it doesn't exist in general. If it did, someone would have developed the appropriate digital mode by now. Dee, N8UZE |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
PBS's Newshour 15 min segment on VOA-BBG (FRI 26 JAN)? Do mpeg copies exist (that are fully downloadable)? | Shortwave | |||
aluminium element segment corrosion & weather proofing... ? | Antenna | |||
Dipole Extension | Antenna | |||
dipole extension? | Antenna | |||
Daws Butler will be the subject of today's ALL THINGS CONSIDERED segment. | Broadcasting |