Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bruce in alaska" wrote in message ... Hello Phil, I was wondering if the Secrecy Clause was still a part of the Communications Act of 1934, or if it had been rescinded or replaced by some other Language in some later Act? Does it still apply to any FCC Operator License Holder? -- Bruce in alaska add path after fast to reply I am not an attorney or a specialist so I can't answer this directly. However, you might be able to find what you want at: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18..._I_20_119.html The entire current communications act is available as a PDF from the FCC at: www.fcc.gov/Reports/1934new.pdf I think what you are asking about is the restriction on discolosing any private communication one might intercept. This never applied to amateur communication because it is not, per se, private. It would apply to any commercial communication you might overhear other than that clearly intended for public consumption such as broadcasting. That is, if you can hear telephone conversations from a wireless phone or similar you may not disclose them to a third party. I suspect that like all law there are all sorts of convoluted special conditions applying to this. -- --- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Santa Clause like you have never seen him before | Antenna | |||
Santa Clause like you have never seen him before | Shortwave | |||
Digital watermarks prove Easter Bunny son of Santa Clause | Shortwave | |||
Swiss Dig in Heels Over Banking Secrecy | Shortwave | |||
FA: 1934 ARRL Handbook | Swap |