Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
KØHB wrote:
Using a NVIS antenna will severely limit the number of stations which can be contacted. 73 de Dick, AC7EL Well, maybe and then again, maybe not. During SS weekends I temporarily rig a very low 75M dipole (25 feet up) to snag the "close in" mults like WI, IA, MB, etc. It's not NVIS per se, but t he idea is to get a high take-off angle. Out here in flyover country it's simply a mult-catcher, but in a dense population area (like the east coast or Ohio valley), having an NVIS ch oice on the antenna switch can be a great advantage. 73, de Hans, K0HB Congratulations, You spotted the strategy involved on the first pass. We are in Maryland about twenty miles north of the District of Columbia. This is a very contact rich environment. The antenna in question is one of many we plan to deploy. -- Tom Horne, W3TDH "This alternating current stuff is just a fad. It is much too dangerous for general use." Thomas Alva Edison |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A Moment To Appeciate a Good Thing. | Antenna | |||
A Moment To Appeciate a Good Thing. | Policy | |||
A Moment To Appeciate a Good Thing. | Policy | |||
There was one good thing about restructuring | Policy | |||
Anyone using antennas for NVIS? | Antenna |