Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/24/2013 1:58 PM, Tom Horne wrote:
Jerry It seems I have a reel talent for being unclear in how I ask questions. I wish that I could turn that into a job skill like the people who right crossword puzzles but I digress. When I said Ad Hoc EOCs I was referring to the ones in the city halls of the existing small cities in the county. They don't have dedicated spaces for an EOC but they set one up in a meeting or conference room when they have something serious going down. The idea would be to set up a few wifi capable links on taller buildings that could be linked to some central high spot and from there to the county's purpose built EOC. Prince Georges county ARES is looking at installing a High Speed Multi Media Mesh (HSMM-MESHâ„¢) Net between their county's hospitals. We have Used HSMM-Mesh at one public service event already and it worked well there. So those of us who have already deployed it successfully in a field deployed application were interested in seeing if it could be used to cover these longer distances effectively. If it were possible to run Web EOC on the links that would be sufficient. We are not trying to restore Facebook connectivity to the people at Temporary shelter locations but rather to put some readily predictable places in touch with the EOC. Since that could be done with automatic control under part 97 of the rules we would not need an operator at the served locations. As for testing we could put LAN routers at one or more of the nodes to allow appropriate local use of the WAN the links would provide which would provide the kind of continuous use and testing that you are talking about. We would have to have a way to shut down the LAN routers when the links were needed for emergency management support. -- Tom W3TDH Tom, Yes, I understood what you meant when you talked about "ad hoc EOC's". But why do you think they are "ad hoc"? Perhaps because they don't have the room for an EOC - which also means they don't have room for the equipment. That's why hams bring equipment into these ad hoc EOC's. As for the mesh network between hospitals. You need to be careful. For instance, NO medical information can be transmitted in the clear (HIPAA regulations have severe penalties for doing so) - which eliminates ham radio for transmitting this information (encryption not allowed). As for "automatic control" - this refers to control for licensed amateur stations. It does NOT include allowing unlicensed operators to control ham transmitters. You will still need a control operator to key the transmitter - which means either someone on site or someone who can otherwise tell when the transmitter needs to be keyed. I have to agree with Fred here. If you want to promote such a system, you should be looking at commercial technology. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle JDS Computer Training Corp. ================== |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Providing emergency communications | Shortwave | |||
decentralized emergency communications | Policy | |||
FA: HAM/EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS VAN "NICE" | Swap | |||
FA: Ham-Emergency Communications Van | Swap | |||
FA: Ham/Emergency Communications Van-NICE | Swap |