![]() |
[KB6NU] Weird antenna behavior
KB6NU's Ham Radio Blog /////////////////////////////////////////// Weird antenna behavior Posted: 01 Nov 2014 05:22 PM PDT http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/kb6nu...m_medium=email Two years ago, I put up a 20m, end-fed half-wave antenna. It wasnt a terrific performer, but it worked OK, and I was able to make contacts on 20m. Basically, its a 33-ft. piece of wire connected to a matching network, made up of a toroid and a capacitor, as shown in the figure at below. The inductor is a toroidal inductor, and the capacitor is made from a length of RG-174 coax, as shown in the figure below. A month or so ago, the antenna started acting funny. While transmitting, the power would fluctuate, not wildly, but noticeably. Thinking it might be the coax, I took my dummy load outside and connected it to the coax, but that checked out OK. The next step was to check the matching unit. I had built the matching network in a waterproof box, or so I thought. When I opened the box, there was water inside it. Water had apparently gotten in around the screws holding the SO-239 to the box. I dried it out, replaced a rusty nut and bolt, and when I put it back together, sealed up the SO-239 with silicone. That still didnt do it, though. I was still getting the erratic behavior. Today, I practically rebuilt the entire antenna, aside from rewinding the toroid and making a new coax capacitor, but its still acting weird. I guess my next step is to make a new capacitor. I suppose some water could have wicked up into the braid, compromising it. That seems kind of far-fetched though. At this point, Im open to any other ideas you guys might have. The post Weird antenna behavior appeared first on KB6NUs Ham Radio Blog. /////////////////////////////////////////// CW Geeks No-Nonsense Guide to Having Fun With Morse Code: Prosigns Posted: 01 Nov 2014 09:00 AM PDT http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/kb6nu...m_medium=email Yet another chapter from my soon-to-be-released CW Geeks No-Nonsense Guide to Having Fun With Morse Code. Prosigns are combinations of characters (although a couple are just a single character) that signify that a particular point in a contact has been reached or that call for an action by the receiving operator. Although the prosigns are written below as two separate characters, you should sending them in a single sequence. For example, the prosign AR should be sent as di-dah-di-dah-dit. AR End of message. You would send AR when youre done sending a message and are ready to turn it over to the other operator. AR is sent before you send callsigns. For example, at the end of your first transmission, you might send:….HW? AR W8ABC DE KB6NU KIn practice, however, this is rarely done, but you will hear it from time to time. AS Stand by. You would send AS if you want the other station to stand by for a short time while you tweak your antenna tuner or perhaps make a note in your log. BK Break. Send BK when you want the other station to start transmitting without going through the station identification process. Feel free to make liberal use of this prosign. Remember that you really only have to identify your station once every ten minutes. You also use BK when beginning a transmission thats responding to an invitation to break in. CL Closing. This signifies that you are going to be going off the air. You send CL at the end of the station ID on your very last transmission of a QSO. For example:73 ES GN SK W8ABC DE KB6NU CL K, KN Go ahead. You send either K or KN after identifying your station to invite the other station to start transmitting. If you are open to allowing other stations to join your conversation, send K. If you want only the station you are currently in contact with to go ahead, send KN. R All received OK. Use this prosign near the beginning of your transmission to signify that you received what was sent. I usually take this to mean that the other station copied my transmission solidly, or in other words, copied every single character. SK End of message. SK is similar to AR, but means that this will be the last transmission of a contact. VE Understood. This prosign is not used often, but you do hear it occasionally. The post CW Geeks No-Nonsense Guide to Having Fun With Morse Code: Prosigns appeared first on KB6NUs Ham Radio Blog. |
[KB6NU] Weird antenna behavior
|
[KB6NU] Weird antenna behavior
I think the use of SK to denote a ham who has passed actually came from the use of SK as described in my blog post.
73, Dan KB6NU On Monday, November 3, 2014 2:09:15 AM UTC-5, Phil Kane wrote: On Sun, 2 Nov 2014 11:13:05 EST, (KB6NU via rec.radio.amateur.moderated Admin) wrote: SK End of message. SK is similar to AR, but means that this will be the last transmission of a contact. I learned it as AR, reference to SK being reserved as a marker for Silent Key (deceased). The Morse is the same. 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane From a Clearing in the Silicon Forest Beaverton (Washington County) Oregon |
[KB6NU] Weird antenna behavior
In message , Phil Kane
writes On Sun, 2 Nov 2014 11:13:05 EST, (KB6NU via rec.radio.amateur.moderated Admin) wrote: SK End of message. SK is similar to AR, but means that this will be the last transmission of a contact. I learned it as AR, reference to SK being reserved as a marker for Silent Key (deceased). The Morse is the same. 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane From a Clearing in the Silicon Forest Beaverton (Washington County) Oregon Well SK is permanent "end of message" I suppose. I've also see it written as VA. You hear BT a lot for a short break. Brian GM4DIJ -- Brian Howie |
[KB6NU] Weird antenna behavior
On 11/3/2014 12:22 PM, Brian Howie wrote:
In message , Phil Kane writes On Sun, 2 Nov 2014 11:13:05 EST, (KB6NU via rec.radio.amateur.moderated Admin) wrote: SK End of message. SK is similar to AR, but means that this will be the last transmission of a contact. I learned it as AR, reference to SK being reserved as a marker for Silent Key (deceased). The Morse is the same. 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane From a Clearing in the Silicon Forest Beaverton (Washington County) Oregon Well SK is permanent "end of message" I suppose. I've also see it written as VA. You hear BT a lot for a short break. Brian GM4DIJ Same here, Brian. Even back in the 60's when I got my novice license, SK was used for "end of conversation", while K was "end of transmission". And it's still used today, AFAIK, although I'm not on HF currently (unfortunately). -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:52 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com