|
N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
Herb wrote: "Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote in message ups.com... patrick jankowiak wrote: Stagger Lee wrote: [snip] 2. The power density is related to the electric field and the impedance of free space (120*Pi) by the formula Pd = e^2 / (120*Pi). [snip] Thanks for the reminder on the calculations. Funny but a couple of my younger colleagues who think themselves quite the electronics men still do not think 'space' has an impedance. There is nothing there, after all.. That is what too much PCB layout/CAD work wioll do to one. hehe Too Bad Saggytits had to cut and paste the "calculations", he didn't know them himself. The only space Saggytits knows about is the one between his dumbo ears. That is why we always register for Pwofessow Woger's classes on negative VSWR and especially his classes on RMS voltage. Yet he didn't have to cut and paste from another website and add a few comments so it looks like he wrote the whole thing like you did. Tell us again how Eric Clapton wrote "Layla" for your ex streetwalker wife instead of George Harrison's wife, stupid. Pwofessow Woger has perfect attendance at ARES meetings in his area. So do you hiding behind your hideous ex streetwalker wife, lisping Davey. |
N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
On 16 Aug 2006 19:40:03 -0700, N9OGL wrote:
: : I would really suggest you read the FCC Office of Engineering and : technology bulletin on PART 15, it OET Bulletin 63 : http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineeri...3/oet63rev.pdf : expecially page 29 which states: : : : What is the relationship between "microvolts per meter" and Watts? : : Watts are the units used to describe the amount of power generated by a : transmitter. Microvolts per meter (µV/m) are the units used to : describe the strength of an electric field created by the operation of : a transmitter. A particular transmitter that generates a constant level : of power (Watts) can produce electric fields of different strengths : (µV/m) depending on, among other things, the type of transmission line : and antenna [snip] Todd, there isn't a law you can quote which governs physics. You can't repeal the law of gravity, and you can't logically state that transmitter power and electric field strength are independent of one another. Think about it: That idea doesn't even make sense. : So logically if you use a ineffecient antenna and ****ty coax then you : can create a low enough field....I'm tell you right now, I Have a field : strength meter that reads microvolts, and I check the field ever : morning, at it's not at no 30 meters either, it's around 17.5 meters Do you know the difference between the far and near fields? Are you aware that an ordinary field strength meter can give you wildly incorrect results when it is placed in the near field of an antenna? Most engineers would tell you that you have to be at least five wavelengths away from the antenna (and preferably ten) before you are out of the influence of the near field. At 33 MHz, the wavelength is roughly nine meters; therefore, your meter is in the near field of the antenna, and all bets are off. : and the electrical field is 1,0000 uV ...So believe what the hell you : want I check it every morning and it's 1,000 uV @17.5 meters and at 30 : meters it's 0. I would also point out I come from a long line of : electricians (my father, my grandfather and my great grandfather) and : THEY will back me up. Sigh. That's what we need: Electricians who never even heard of free space impedance. ==================== God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and then there was light. |
Top Ten Signs Your Home is in Glendale, WV
Top Ten Signs Your Home is in Glendale, WV
10. Someone asks, "What died in here?" and you show them 9. Dust on TV screen gives everybody comical Andy Rooney eyebrows 8. When the FCC mobile lab pulls up in front of your house, Riley Hollingsworth refuses to get out of the van 7. The so-called "Dust Bunnies" have sharp, snapping teeth 6. Your house gets hit by a twister and it actually looks better 5. Guests take one look at your bathroom and decide to use the backyard 4. When someone from the health department rings your doorbell, you say, "Not again!" 3. Every time you turn on a faucet, you hear a muffled barking sound 2. Even Mark Morgan refuses to sleep on your floor 1. You've been receiving death threats from Mr. Clean |
Cease desist and grow up
|
Top Ten Signs Your Home is in Glendale, WV
Stagger Lee wrote:
Top Ten Signs Your Home is in Glendale, WV 10. Someone asks, "What died in here?" and you show them 9. Dust on TV screen gives everybody comical Andy Rooney eyebrows 8. When the FCC mobile lab pulls up in front of your house, Riley Hollingsworth refuses to get out of the van 7. The so-called "Dust Bunnies" have sharp, snapping teeth 6. Your house gets hit by a twister and it actually looks better 5. Guests take one look at your bathroom and decide to use the backyard 4. When someone from the health department rings your doorbell, you say, "Not again!" 3. Every time you turn on a faucet, you hear a muffled barking sound 2. Even Mark Morgan refuses to sleep on your floor 1. You've been receiving death threats from Mr. Clean Have you noticed that Roger seems torn about your identity? Sometimes he thinks you're Lloyd. Sometimes he believes you to be me. At other times he believes you to be a number of others. I believe that your number 4 in the above list is not quite complete. Roger might exclaim (very quietly) "Not again!", but he won't answer the door. I'm still waiting for him to test his theory that I'd never go face-to-face with him. Do you know if Roger has ever been involuntarily committed to a mental institution? Dave K8MN |
N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
Roger Wiseman AB8MQ, posing as "Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote:
Herb wrote: "Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote in message roups.com... patrick jankowiak wrote: Stagger Lee wrote: [snip] 2. The power density is related to the electric field and the impedance of free space (120*Pi) by the formula Pd = e^2 / (120*Pi). [snip] Thanks for the reminder on the calculations. Funny but a couple of my younger colleagues who think themselves quite the electronics men still do not think 'space' has an impedance. There is nothing there, after all.. That is what too much PCB layout/CAD work wioll do to one. hehe Too Bad Saggytits had to cut and paste the "calculations", he didn't know them himself. The only space Saggytits knows about is the one between his dumbo ears. That is why we always register for Pwofessow Woger's classes on negative VSWR and especially his classes on RMS voltage. Yet he didn't have to cut and paste from another website and add a few comments so it looks like he wrote the whole thing like you did. I saw no evidence that he did so, Rog. Can you provide links to where we can find the originals? Tell us again how Eric Clapton wrote "Layla" for your ex streetwalker wife instead of George Harrison's wife, stupid. You seem to be laboring under some confusion, Roger. I didn't write the material to which you responded. I've posted under no sock puppets, ever. Don't measure others by your standard. I don't have an ex-streetwalker wife. Since I know how my wife spells her name, I'd hardly have been mistaken about the origina of the Clapton song, especially since my wife was in adolescence when the song was released, Stupid. Pwofessow Woger has perfect attendance at ARES meetings in his area. So do you hiding behind your hideous ex streetwalker wife, lisping Davey. "So do you hiding..."? Let's see: My wife never worked as a streetwalker; I've never hidden behind her. I don't lisp. You're batting .000, Rog. If you'd like to test your little theory that I'd not meet you face-to-face, I'm more than willing to participate. You and I can have a real heart-to-heart. Have you ever been confined in jail or a mental institution, Rog? Now, am I "Herb" or "Stagger Lee" or "Patrick Jankowiak"? Dave K8MN |
N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
Dave Heil wrote: Roger Wiseman AB8MQ, posing as "Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote: Herb wrote: "Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote in message roups.com... patrick jankowiak wrote: Stagger Lee wrote: [snip] 2. The power density is related to the electric field and the impedance of free space (120*Pi) by the formula Pd = e^2 / (120*Pi). [snip] Thanks for the reminder on the calculations. Funny but a couple of my younger colleagues who think themselves quite the electronics men still do not think 'space' has an impedance. There is nothing there, after all.. That is what too much PCB layout/CAD work wioll do to one. hehe Too Bad Saggytits had to cut and paste the "calculations", he didn't know them himself. The only space Saggytits knows about is the one between his dumbo ears. That is why we always register for Pwofessow Woger's classes on negative VSWR and especially his classes on RMS voltage. Yet he didn't have to cut and paste from another website and add a few comments so it looks like he wrote the whole thing like you did. I saw no evidence that he did so, Rog. Can you provide links to where we can find the originals? Tell us again how Eric Clapton wrote "Layla" for your ex streetwalker wife instead of George Harrison's wife, stupid. You seem to be laboring under some confusion, Roger. I didn't write the material to which you responded. I've posted under no sock puppets, ever. Don't measure others by your standard. I don't have an ex-streetwalker wife. Since I know how my wife spells her name, I'd hardly have been mistaken about the origina of the Clapton song, especially since my wife was in adolescence when the song was released, Stupid. Pwofessow Woger has perfect attendance at ARES meetings in his area. So do you hiding behind your hideous ex streetwalker wife, lisping Davey. "So do you hiding..."? Let's see: My wife never worked as a streetwalker; I've never hidden behind her. I don't lisp. You're batting .000, Rog. If you'd like to test your little theory that I'd not meet you face-to-face, I'm more than willing to participate. You and I can have a real heart-to-heart. Have you ever been confined in jail or a mental institution, Rog? Now, am I "Herb" or "Stagger Lee" or "Patrick Jankowiak"? Dave K8MN No Dave you're not them. You're just a cowardly asshole. Maybe one day I'll have the pleasure of a face to face talk with you. Maybe we can watch Roger bang your whore! |
N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
|
N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
Mr. Hammington wrote:
Dave Heil wrote: Roger Wiseman AB8MQ, posing as "Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote: Herb wrote: "Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote in message egroups.com... patrick jankowiak wrote: Stagger Lee wrote: [snip] 2. The power density is related to the electric field and the impedance of free space (120*Pi) by the formula Pd = e^2 / (120*Pi). [snip] Thanks for the reminder on the calculations. Funny but a couple of my younger colleagues who think themselves quite the electronics men still do not think 'space' has an impedance. There is nothing there, after all.. That is what too much PCB layout/CAD work wioll do to one. hehe Too Bad Saggytits had to cut and paste the "calculations", he didn't know them himself. The only space Saggytits knows about is the one between his dumbo ears. That is why we always register for Pwofessow Woger's classes on negative VSWR and especially his classes on RMS voltage. Yet he didn't have to cut and paste from another website and add a few comments so it looks like he wrote the whole thing like you did. I saw no evidence that he did so, Rog. Can you provide links to where we can find the originals? Tell us again how Eric Clapton wrote "Layla" for your ex streetwalker wife instead of George Harrison's wife, stupid. You seem to be laboring under some confusion, Roger. I didn't write the material to which you responded. I've posted under no sock puppets, ever. Don't measure others by your standard. I don't have an ex-streetwalker wife. Since I know how my wife spells her name, I'd hardly have been mistaken about the origina of the Clapton song, especially since my wife was in adolescence when the song was released, Stupid. Pwofessow Woger has perfect attendance at ARES meetings in his area. So do you hiding behind your hideous ex streetwalker wife, lisping Davey. "So do you hiding..."? Let's see: My wife never worked as a streetwalker; I've never hidden behind her. I don't lisp. You're batting .000, Rog. If you'd like to test your little theory that I'd not meet you face-to-face, I'm more than willing to participate. You and I can have a real heart-to-heart. Have you ever been confined in jail or a mental institution, Rog? Now, am I "Herb" or "Stagger Lee" or "Patrick Jankowiak"? Dave K8MN No Dave you're not them. You're just a cowardly asshole. I'm sure that your ilk thinks that anyone who stands against the likes of you, is an asshole. Cowardly is one adjective that you can't use in describing me. Maybe one day I'll have the pleasure of a face to face talk with you. For that to happen, you'd have to show up. We both know that isn't likely to happen. Maybe we can watch Roger bang your whore! Oh, I'm sure that there'd be some banging on somethin'. It just won't be on my wife. Of course you already knew that. Dave K8MN |
Top Ten Signs Your Home is in Glendale, WV
"Pwofessow" Woger has received a gwant to study multiple
personalities, and he is doing the research phase of his pwoject here in rrap. Upon compwetion of his research, the "pwofessow" hopes to become a research fewow (fellow) at Belmont Tech in their mail order college degwee program . Degwee-by-Mail Price List ___________________________________ Associates - $5 Bachelors - $10 Masters (this is the one Woger has) $20 Doctors $25 73, Herb |
cease, desist and grow up
Mr. Hammington wrote: cease, desist and grow up |
HAMS ACCUSE OMEGA ONE OF PIRACY!
N9OGL wrote: from Omega One Radio Blog (http://n9ogl.blogspot.com/) HAMS ACCUSE OMEGA ONE OF PIRACY! One the USENETS (newsgroups) Amateur Radio Operators are accuse Omega One Radio of Piracy and have even gone as far as get on N9OGL BLOG http://n9oglvoice.blogspot.com and claim they have notified Riley Hollingsworth of the FCC of his "alleged" pirate activities. The truth is Omega One Radio is Legal. The power output of Omega One is 10,000 uV/ meter @ 30 meters(47 CFR Part 15.225). What's even worse is that this Ham operators are accusing someone of an illegal activity without even reading the rules and regulations. When Todd N9OGL, posted the rules those amateur's claimed "Just another cut and paste by Todd". The truth is most amateur radio operators don't know the rules, sometimes even their own rules. They believe that ALL radio transmitters and operators must be licensed by the FCC.They also believe that If you need to know about a rule or regulation that you have to be a lawyer or ask a lawyer to understand what those rules mean. This in term show how bad amateurs really are, it shows that amateurs want to play radio cop and jump the gun without reading and doing research on the matter. The fact is Omega One radio with it Part 15 power output is legal just like Wi-fi, Baby monitors, Cordless Phones, remote control toys and walkie talkies are legal because they too are Part 15. Todd Daugherty N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13.556.00 MHz LSB not piracy, just stupidity. you poor stupid mother****er! |
HAMS ACCUSE OMEGA ONE OF PIRACY!
wrote: another sock puppet wismen cease, desist and grow up |
HAMS ACCUSE OMEGA ONE OF PIRACY! - Mark, Just ignore them.
"an old friend" wrote in news:1155851323.329852.205300
@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com: wrote: another sock puppet wismen cease, desist and grow up Mark, Just ignore them. They only tease you because of the stupid things you say when you follow up. Just ignore them and they'll give up. Stop giving them reasons to tease you. It only makes you look more stupid. Take a break from the radio groups for a while, Maybe work on your moon bounce some more. SC |
cease, desist and grow up - Mark, Just ignore them.
"an old friend" wrote in news:1155840113.952410.3090
@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: Mr. Hammington wrote: cease, desist and grow up Mark, Just ignore them. They only tease you because of the stupid things you say when you follow up. Just ignore them and they'll give up. Stop giving them reasons to tease you. It only makes you look more stupid. Take a break from the radio groups for a while, Maybe work on your moon bounce some more. SC |
HAMS ACCUSE OMEGA ONE OF PIRACY! - Mark, Just ignore them.
Slow Code wrote:
They only tease you because of the stupid things you say when you follow up. Just ignore them and they'll give up. Stop giving them reasons to tease you. It only makes you look more stupid. Take a break from the radio groups for a while, Maybe work on your moon bounce some more. Jeez...first it's "Obsessive Steve" with his 40 or 50 "BUSTED" posts and now you with your 20th "work on your moon bounce" post. Step right up, folks...TWO obsessive-compulsives, no waiting. As previously requested by others, lose the "Code", just "Slow" will be perfectly descriptive. |
N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
Stagger Lee wrote: On 15 Aug 2006 19:40:07 -0700, N9OGL wrote: The power in wattage and the electrical field are not related because a power output in wattage can produce different fields depending on lengh of coax, antenna, antenna height...and your friends in the Office of You can't get around physics, Todd. The power density is directly related to the electric field through an Ohm's law type of relationship, expressed as the square of the r.m.s value of e, divided by the impedance of free space. Once you know the power density, it is a matter of summing that power density over the radiation pattern of the antenna to figure out the total radiated power. Therefore, there *is* a relationship between radiated power and field strength. In the case of an isotropic radiator, the relationship between radiated power and field strength is easy to calculate, and it provides one with a limiting case which can act as a guideline. I know it, you know it...tell it to the FCC beacuse THEIR the ones saying there isn't . I would right now like to point out that I'm NOT using a Isotropic radiator. engineering and technology at the FCC will tell you that. The antenna I'm using is a very imefficient antenna, in fact the signal is acually I'm not interested in your rationalizations, Todd, because I'm not the one who is at risk. In this real world, your power output is about five orders of magnitude larger than the power theoretically needed to produce the maximum allowed electric field. To me, that would be a cause for great concern. If you want to risk an FCC enforcement action against you, be my guest. Again it's NOT my rational it's the FCC's but like I told Stebie the HAM and Internet COP if you have a problem with it, go bitch to The FCC and I'll throw their little bulletin both in theirs and the judges face, along with a few other things.. including how much of sick joke their licensing and waiver system is!! Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13556.00 MHz LSB ==================== God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and then there was light. |
N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
N9OGL wrote: Stagger Lee wrote: On 15 Aug 2006 19:40:07 -0700, N9OGL wrote: The power in wattage and the electrical field are not related because a power output in wattage can produce different fields depending on lengh of coax, antenna, antenna height...and your friends in the Office of You can't get around physics, Todd. The power density is directly related to the electric field through an Ohm's law type of relationship, expressed as the square of the r.m.s value of e, divided by the impedance of free space. Once you know the power density, it is a matter of summing that power density over the radiation pattern of the antenna to figure out the total radiated power. Therefore, there *is* a relationship between radiated power and field strength. In the case of an isotropic radiator, the relationship between radiated power and field strength is easy to calculate, and it provides one with a limiting case which can act as a guideline. I know it, you know it...tell it to the FCC beacuse THEIR the ones saying there isn't . I would right now like to point out that I'm NOT using a Isotropic radiator. engineering and technology at the FCC will tell you that. The antenna I'm using is a very imefficient antenna, in fact the signal is acually I'm not interested in your rationalizations, Todd, because I'm not the one who is at risk. In this real world, your power output is about five orders of magnitude larger than the power theoretically needed to produce the maximum allowed electric field. To me, that would be a cause for great concern. If you want to risk an FCC enforcement action against you, be my guest. Again it's NOT my rational it's the FCC's but like I told Stebie the HAM and Internet COP if you have a problem with it, go bitch to The FCC and I'll throw their little bulletin both in theirs and the judges face, along with a few other things.. including how much of sick joke their licensing and waiver system is!! sorry Tood there you are worng you will not throw the bullitin in anyone face why? because NObody will show up to get hit with it The FCC for it faults knows Know that a lot of are full of it Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13556.00 MHz LSB ==================== God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and then there was light. |
N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
an old friend wrote: N9OGL wrote: Stagger Lee wrote: On 15 Aug 2006 19:40:07 -0700, N9OGL wrote: The power in wattage and the electrical field are not related because a power output in wattage can produce different fields depending on lengh of coax, antenna, antenna height...and your friends in the Office of You can't get around physics, Todd. The power density is directly related to the electric field through an Ohm's law type of relationship, expressed as the square of the r.m.s value of e, divided by the impedance of free space. Once you know the power density, it is a matter of summing that power density over the radiation pattern of the antenna to figure out the total radiated power. Therefore, there *is* a relationship between radiated power and field strength. In the case of an isotropic radiator, the relationship between radiated power and field strength is easy to calculate, and it provides one with a limiting case which can act as a guideline. I know it, you know it...tell it to the FCC beacuse THEIR the ones saying there isn't . I would right now like to point out that I'm NOT using a Isotropic radiator. engineering and technology at the FCC will tell you that. The antenna I'm using is a very imefficient antenna, in fact the signal is acually I'm not interested in your rationalizations, Todd, because I'm not the one who is at risk. In this real world, your power output is about five orders of magnitude larger than the power theoretically needed to produce the maximum allowed electric field. To me, that would be a cause for great concern. If you want to risk an FCC enforcement action against you, be my guest. Again it's NOT my rational it's the FCC's but like I told Stebie the HAM and Internet COP if you have a problem with it, go bitch to The FCC and I'll throw their little bulletin both in theirs and the judges face, along with a few other things.. including how much of sick joke their licensing and waiver system is!! sorry Tood there you are worng you will not throw the bullitin in anyone face why? because NObody will show up to get hit with it The FCC for it faults knows Know that a lot of are full of it Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13556.00 MHz LSB That's how they have lied all these years about the waivering process, they go to the courts saying one thing, then turn around and do another. Same thing here, they publish bulletins saying one thing and then go after people who's following the same rules, claiming something different. If they want to complain about the station they can file the complaint here http://www.fcc.gov/eb/sed/ulo.html Complaints Written complaints alleging violations of Section 301 of the Communications Act should be sent to the Federal Communications Commission, Enforcement Bureau, Spectrum Enforcement Division, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554. Complaints should include the name of the operator, if known, how the station identifies itself, the location of the station, the operating frequency, the type of station being operated, and whether the station's operation is causing interference. For complaints involving unlicensed amateur radio operations, please click here. For complaints involving unlicensed broadcast station operations, please click here. But I will fight it ever step of the way, I would like them (the FCC) to explain to the judge why they didn't consider my Seven (7) broadcast applications and Waivers?? So all I ahve to tell stebie and his butt buddies go for it!!! |
N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
N9OGL wrote:
an old friend wrote: N9OGL wrote: That's how they have lied all these years about the waivering process, they go to the courts saying one thing, then turn around and do another. Same thing here, they publish bulletins saying one thing and then go after people who's following the same rules, claiming something different. If they want to complain about the station they can file the complaint here http://www.fcc.gov/eb/sed/ulo.html Complaints Written complaints alleging violations of Section 301 of the Communications Act should be sent to the Federal Communications Commission, Enforcement Bureau, Spectrum Enforcement Division, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554. Complaints should include the name of the operator, if known, how the station identifies itself, the location of the station, the operating frequency, the type of station being operated, and whether the station's operation is causing interference. For complaints involving unlicensed amateur radio operations, please click here. For complaints involving unlicensed broadcast station operations, please click here. But I will fight it ever step of the way, I would like them (the FCC) to explain to the judge why they didn't consider my Seven (7) broadcast applications and Waivers?? So all I ahve to tell stebie and his butt buddies go for it!!! it will never happen the FCC will never strike iup on the wod of Hams esp one with hisory of harassment like wismen and Robeson I comend you on your stand |
Saggytits Lee plagiarizes in another cut and paste!
Saggytits Lee wrote: Top Ten Signs Your Home is in Glendale, WV More cut and paste plagiarism from Saggytits! Poor Saggytits, his ex-streetwalker Finnish wife will soon henpeckhim to get off the computer and videotape her performing cunnilingus on the family dog. |
Cease breathing, Markie!
an old fraud wrote: Cease Cease spreading your AIDS to little children. |
N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
an old fraud wrote: it will never happen the FCC will never strike iup on the wod of Hams esp one with hisory of harassment like wismen and Robeson I comend you on your stand No, the FCC is about to levy a fine on you for talking to unlicensed stations, Marqueer. |
Saggytits Lee plagiarizes in another cut and paste!
"Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote in message ps.com... Saggytits Lee wrote: Top Ten Signs Your Home is in Glendale, WV More cut and paste plagiarism from Saggytits! Poor Saggytits, his ex-streetwalker Finnish wife will soon henpeckhim to get off the computer and videotape her performing cunnilingus on the family dog. / More witty one-liners from Woger. He sure is original, ain't he? |
N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
|
Saggytits Lee plagiarizes in another cut and paste! - Mark, Just ignore them.
wrote in :
On 18 Aug 2006 05:33:10 -0700, "Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote: Saggytits Lee wrote: Top Ten Signs Your Home is in Glendale, WV More cut and paste plagiarism from Saggytits! Poor Saggytits, his ex-streetwalker Finnish wife will soon henpeckhim to get off the computer and videotape her performing cunnilingus on the family dog. cease desists and grow up http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ Mark, Just ignore them. They only tease you because of the stupid things you say when you follow up. Just ignore them and they'll give up. Stop giving them reasons to tease you. It only makes you look more stupid. Take a break from the radio groups for a while, Maybe work on your moon bounce some more. SC |
Saggytits Lee plagiarizes in another cut and paste!
Not Lloyd wrote:
"Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote in message ps.com... Saggytits Lee wrote: Top Ten Signs Your Home is in Glendale, WV More cut and paste plagiarism from Saggytits! Poor Saggytits, his ex-streetwalker Finnish wife will soon henpeckhim to get off the computer and videotape her performing cunnilingus on the family dog. / More witty one-liners from Woger. He sure is original, ain't he? Rog is acting even less stable than is his norm. Two days ago he believed that I was Stagger Lee. Yesterday he thought Lloyd Davies was Stagger Lee. Today he seems convinced that I am Stagger Lee. He's even inventing new words like "henpeckhim". He has a fixation on prostitution and animal sex. The UnWiseman may be headed back to the funny farm. Dave K8MN |
N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit - Mark, Just ignore them.
wrote in :
On 16 Aug 2006 12:26:45 -0700, wrote: Cease desist and grow up http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ Mark, Just ignore them. They only tease you because of the stupid things you say when you follow up. Just ignore them and they'll give up. Stop giving them reasons to tease you. It only makes you look more stupid. Take a break from the radio groups for a while, Maybe work on your moon bounce some more. SC |
HAMS ACCUSE OMEGA ONE OF PIRACY!
"N9OGL" wrote in message oups.com... from Omega One Radio Blog (http://n9ogl.blogspot.com/) HAMS ACCUSE OMEGA ONE OF PIRACY! One the USENETS (newsgroups) Amateur Radio Operators are accuse Omega One Radio of Piracy and have even gone as far as get on N9OGL BLOG http://n9oglvoice.blogspot.com and claim they have notified Riley Hollingsworth of the FCC of his "alleged" pirate activities. The truth is Omega One Radio is Legal. The power output of Omega One is 10,000 uV/ meter @ 30 meters(47 CFR Part 15.225). What's even worse is that this Ham operators are accusing someone of an illegal activity without even reading the rules and regulations. When Todd N9OGL, posted the rules those amateur's claimed "Just another cut and paste by Todd". The truth is most amateur radio operators don't know the rules, sometimes even their own rules. They believe that ALL radio transmitters and operators must be licensed by the FCC.They also believe that If you need to know about a rule or regulation that you have to be a lawyer or ask a lawyer to understand what those rules mean. This in term show how bad amateurs really are, it shows that amateurs want to play radio cop and jump the gun without reading and doing research on the matter. The fact is Omega One radio with it Part 15 power output is legal just like Wi-fi, Baby monitors, Cordless Phones, remote control toys and walkie talkies are legal because they too are Part 15. Todd Daugherty N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13.556.00 MHz LSB |
HAMS ACCUSE OMEGA ONE OF PIRACY!...AND THEY'RE RIGHT!...N9OGL ADMITS "OMEGA ONE" 100 WATTS, RUNNING WAAAAAAAY OVER PART 15 LIMITS ! ! !
N9OGL wrote: K4YZ wrote: N9OGL wrote: K4YZ wrote: SNIP Steve the Electrical Field emission for 13 Mhz is 15,484 uV/m @ 30 Meters. Omega One Radio is running a power output 100 watts...(SNIP) My point made due to your Freudian slip, ToiddieBoy. WHY DID YOU NO ADDRESS THIS, TOIDDIEBOY...?!?! What part of this don't you understand?? I understand it all. I understand you're an idiot. I understand that you're a basement dwelling parasite that your poor, aging parents won't be able to rid themselves of save for death. I understand that in a fit of rage you made a Freudian slip that disclosed your TRUE power for your pirate radio station whish is a quantum leap over the Part 15 limits you CLAIM you're observing. are you some come of ####ing moron?? No, my last name is NOT "Daugherty" THE FCC MEASURES ELECTRICAL FIELD, POWER IN WATTS CAN PRODUCT DIFFERENT ELECTRICAL FIELDS DEPENDING ON ANTENNA, FEED LINE AND OTHER FACTORS...I put in big letters so you can ####ing understand it. AND LET ME PUT THIS IN BIG LETTERS SO YOU CAN UNDERSTAND IT...NO ONE HERE (EXCEPT FOR MORKIE, AND HE THINKS PEOPLE BELEIVE HIS LIES) BELIEVES YOU'RE GENERATING 100 WATTS OF RF IN ORDER TO RADIATE PART 15 LEVELS OF HF SIGNAL. AND IF YOU ARE, IT CLEARLY DEMONSTRATES WHO THE "MORON" REALLY IS! SNIP Why hasn't the FCC come to my door?? Perhaps the thought of what they might touch or be touched by is more appaling than allowing your to think you're a DJ. no Steve it's bacuse your a ####ing liar.....plain and simple. You believe what you want to believe and unless it comes form month it not true. I believe you're an idiotic moron. See...THAT was easy! And even more moronic is your frequent posts that expose your even MORE moronic and pathetic life wherein you set up make believe broadcast stations and play disc jockey to a non-existant audience. I doubt anyone heard anything you put on the air, Toiddie. Not true on the Free radio Network, a number of people have heard me. Running 100 watts, I am sure SOMEone did! Ahhhh Steve, that's what it really is...You mad because you can hear the station..... Nope. I don't listen. What coul YOU possibly have to say on the air that I can't see here? And if I am hearing you here, it would be proof that you are violating Part 15, as I already know you are from your posts here. BTW...Got a legit "N" Number on that illegally modified ultralight of yours yet? Finsih that "Sport Pilot" license, or just hoping the feds don't card you one Sunday afternoon? There nothing illegal about it steve, I own a high max ultralight. Hi Max can be made into ultralight. Despite what YOU might think, And No, I've moved that aside for my education I'm hoping to get back ito it next year steve, thanks for your concern. There's no convern, Toiddie, except you you illegally modifying an ultralight as per Part 103. And yes, Toiddie...A 10 gallon fuel tank on an ultralight IS illegal. Whatever steve, you seem to me that your think ever thing I do is illegal... No. The FAA says a 10 gallon fuel tank on an ultralight violated Part 103. Period. Good...You quit while you were behind...Now go refit that ultralight to make it legal, TrashMouth. Not if it's only filled to 5 gallons it not. Yes, it is...The aircraft cannot be CONFIGURED to carry more than 5 gallons of fuel, Toiddieboy. It says nothing about configured, it says that an ultralight can not carry no more then 5 gallons of gas. therefor steve, as long as I'm carrying 5 gallons of gas it is legal. Reading on... That ruse has been tried by many others. The FAA says that haivng a fuel tank in excess of 5 gallons is prima facie evidence of non-compliance. That's the same standard that the FCC uses to declare that simly HAVING a linear amplifier for 11 meters, even if it's not presently connected, is evidence of non-compliance. As long as your not using it, there is no violation. Yes, there is. Ask the THOUSANDS of people who have had a knock a the door over the years and had thier equipemtn confiscated. Sure they do in your tiny little mine... I don't own a mine, Toiddie, although I took a tour of one in Inyokern, CA, once. And the FAA and the FCC STILL state that the presence of illegal modifications, even when not "caught in the act" of being used, is evidence of failure to comly with thier respective rules and regulations. No amount of your pontification about your "freedoms" will change the FACT that you are implicitly violating several federal laws... Don't beleive me? Ask the Department of Justice. I guess you're at a loss for words here, ToiddieBoy. I'm Still Waiting for the FCC...but again hey your a liar.... Nope. Not today...not yesterday...not tomorrow... BTW, College(Not)Boy...it's "you're" a liar... (BIG SNIP) People like you who live "outside the box" in the manner you describe in yur antics are called "lawbreakers". YOU become MY problem as a law ABIDING person. No steve people like you who live in the box has no ####ing life, and it's ashame people like you can't really enjoy life..but hey you go back it your little box where you belong, leave us REAL people alone.. I have plenty of life, Toiddie... And I use a lot of it in order to improve myself with...Such as using the education I was provided with to properly apply English grammar to my thoughts. You should try it too. And I DO enjoy life, Toiddie...And I enjoy it WITHIN the boundries of the laws as we as Americans are prescribed to do. There is NO exception to the use of your HiMax as an ultralight under Part 103 as you have modified it. Again Not true, it's only illegal if you fill it up to 10 gallons, Filling it up to 5 gallons makes it legal. No, it doesn't. Haivng a 10 gallon fuel tank on an ultralight is illegal. Period. Whatever Steve Very immature. Of course spoiled basement dwelling brats like you usuallly are. nice...closet dweller.. Nope... And you're STILL in violation of Part 103. (HUGE SNIP) Now that I know you've got 100 watts output, I'd have to be crazy to think no one could hear you, Toiddie, unless you were running that into a buried dummyload. Again steve when it comes to Part 15 the FCC is looking for Electrical field stength not wattage. You'd have to be a complete idiot to only NOT be radiating more than Part 15 levels with 100 watts output at that frequency, Toiddie....Now if you were operating in the 1750 meter band, I could understand that kind of power loss. Sure it achieve Part 15 requirement I do have that loss....you seem to have a hard time understanding that... No...I understand it perfectly well. YOU screwed up in a fit of rage and actually announced to the world how much power you really are using for your illegal broadcasting operation. You have FURTHER screwed up by announcing all these "QSL card requests" you are getting...Just more evidence that you're violating Part 15. YOU are the MORON if you think the FCC doesn't have engineers that understand the technical limitations of Part 15 as opposed to what you're claiming you're accomplishing. Are YOU going to tell me that YOU, a General Class Amateur licensee are INTENTIONALLY operting with those kinds of losses...?!?!? This is Part 15 not amateur, learn that... I know it, LiarBoy. And I know that just because you are CLAIMINIG to be a "legal" Part 15 operator, your "bragging" indicates that you're technically incompetent (MORE SNIPPAGE) And even more..... Too bad you didn't just clean up your language in the first place, which I see in the last couple of posts that you've done now...Too bad you didn't LEARN before you got shut down the FIRST time. And Toiddie...No law prevents ANYone from suing if there is adequate reason to do so. Any lawyer worth his/her salt could have not only gotten you back on with your original ISP, but probably gotten you free service for a long, long time. Ummm...Dumb### Under a federal Law Internet service providers are immune for what their users put on third party systems and it has been upheld by the US Supreme Court.....you sure have a hard time learning....must be from all that ####ing inbreding going on down there. No, Toiddie...the lack of learning is YOURS. You've gotten canned TWICE now for certain behaviour, yet here you are, doing it AGAIN! And College(Not)Boy....It's "inbreeding", not "inbreding"... And FYI, I am from father North than you... Soooooooooo.....Seems the moron is YOU, ToiddieBoy., Yes Steve, I am beacuse I keep talking to a half ### moron Ooooops....There you go again with the profanity...Working on getting booted THREE times, Toiddie? Each subsequent boot makes it easier to justify to the next ISP that you're deserving of punitive action. Keep up steve and I'll get you for Cyberstalking, which is a federal crime... There's no stalking on MY part, TrashMouth... YOU keep bringing YOUR mischeviousness HERE...I don't go looking for you. Idiot! I say there's nothing more "homebrew" about any aspect of N9OGL or any bootleg broadcast station you're running than the PL259's, or perhaps the occassional dipole. I don't use dipole only little closet dwellers like you do... No closet dwelling here, Toiddie... And if you care to, you can refer to ARRL DXCC award #37,136. Dipoles and 100 watts served me just fine. SNIP This has nothing to do with suppressing ANYone's "free speech", Toiddie. It has to do with technical compliance with federal law, which EVERY person must do in the United States. No dumb### there is...but hey I'm still waiting.....maybe if you kiss the FCC ### a little harder maybe they show up... After being only the SECOND RRAP'er to get booted off the Internet TWICE, you still haven't learned a thing, have you? Maybe the third time will be the charm? If you're generating 100 watts of RF at 13mHz to radiate a Part 15 level signal, I say you're an idiot...A WASTEFUL idiot at that. What TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION do you offer for operating in this manner? To compile with Part 15.....Steve stick with Ham radio better yet I have some walkie talkies I send you...they seems to be more your speed What did you "compile" for Part 15? I know you're compiling violations, but that's nothing new. And you didn't answer my question, TrashMouth... WHY would you generate over 100 watts inorder to radiate less than Part 15 limitis...according to you, that is....... BTW you will have proven my point that YOU and the FCC are supressing not only the free speech of amateur radio operators, but the free speech of Part 15 radio stations. What Part 15 radio stations, ToiddieBoy? You've admitted right here that you're running 100 watts. You're illegal, ToiddieBoy...Just like I said you were... Steve I'm going only say this once Your a ####ing idiot..and I'm done, either put up or shut up And I'm going to say this until I decide to not say it any more...Your misuse of the English language proves that your only "campus time" has been as janitorial staff. Idiot. Steve, K4YZ |
HAMS ACCUSE OMEGA ONE OF PIRACY!...AND THEY'RE RIGHT!
|
HAMS ACCUSE OMEGA ONE OF PIRACY!...AND THEY'RE RIGHT!
|
HAMS ACCUSE OMEGA ONE OF PIRACY!...AND THEY'RE RIGHT!
wrote: On 21 Aug 2006 14:06:15 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote: MorkMakesSo wrote: cease and desist cease and desist you are libeling Todd now No, I am not. yes you are Nope. He's blatantly violating federal law. no evidence exiosts that he is doing so Sure there is. In every post wherein he continues this lie about being "Part 15 lega" for "Omega One", and as long as he keeps his ultralight illegally refit with non-authorized changes. You're supporting him. in using his lgitimate rights under law of course I am What rights? No one has a right to violate ANY law except in the face of life threatening circumstances that may mandate deviance from those laws... cease and desit you interference in lawfull operation There's no "lawful operation" from N9OGL. Steve, K4YZ |
HAMS ACCUSE OMEGA ONE OF PIRACY!...AND THEY'RE RIGHT!
wrote:
On 21 Aug 2006 14:13:14 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote: wrote: On 21 Aug 2006 14:06:15 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote: MorkMakesSo wrote: cease and desist cease and desist you are libeling Todd now No, I am not. yes you are Nope. yes you are cease and desist Nope. He's blatantly violating federal law. no evidence exiosts that he is doing so Sure there is. In every post wherein he continues this lie about being "Part 15 legal" for "Omega One". no such post exists legaly and I have have seen now such post that even suggests it Try that in English, Fatboy. you are just trying to proclaim you can measure rf power remotely the same way you claim to be able to detrime spectroscpy result withotu a line of sight on me I didn't claim I could measure anything I couldn't put my hands on, fatboy. TrashMouth is the one who stated that he's running 100watts in 13mHz...Not me. cease and desist No. Steve, K4YZ |
HAMS ACCUSE OMEGA ONE OF PIRACY!...AND THEY'RE RIGHT!
|
HAMS ACCUSE OMEGA ONE OF PIRACY!...AND THEY'RE RIGHT! AND MORK MORON (KB9RQZ) CONTINUES CROSSPOSTING SPAMMING
|
MORK MORON ON NEW RANT TANGENT
|
MORKIE ON NEW RANT TANGENT...CONTNUES TO CROSSPOST TO IRRELEVENT NG'S DESPITE NUMEROUS CLAIMS HE DOESN'T DO SUCH THINGS
wrote: On 21 Aug 2006 14:47:31 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote: wrote: cease and desist. Cease and desist what? nope you claimed siting there in Tennesse you could do it Nope. yes you made that rediculous claim What's rediculous is you claiming I said it. cease and desist your harrment you sack of #### Now, now. 3-College-Degree Boy...SURELY you can express yourself better than with profanity...?!?! not to the likes of you Morkie, I am not the one who defers to profanity. YOU are. Idiot. yes you are Nope. Steve, K4YZ |
MORK ON NEW RANT TANGENT....CROSS POST THEN LIE ABOUT CROSSPOSTING
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:50 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com