![]() |
license renewal
From: Slow Code on Fri, Aug 18 2006 4:26 pm
" wrote in From: Pin-medic on Fri, Aug 18 2006 10:30 am I agree Bob, and maybe we'd have better operators as a result. Considering the waning interest in our dying hobby though, all that would probably do is eliminate even more operators from the ranks, leading the FCC to reduce our bands even more by selling them to the highest bidder. 1. The FCC has NOT "reduced 'your' bands," nor is it somehow threatening to "sell them" to anyone. Had you bothered to look at this process of AUCTIONING certain COMMERCIAL bands and the Congressional laws establishing it, you would have seen that it does NOT apply to radio amateurs. Hey, "Slow," no comment on that? 2. Since WARC-79 'you' have gotten MORE BANDS and that has increased up to a few years ago when 'you' got the five 60m channels. 1979 was TWENTY-SEVEN YEARS AGO. 3. There doesn't seem to be any "waning interest" in USA amateur radio considering the overall licensee numbers. The newcomer licensees are - just managing - to keep the licensee numbers in numeric bouyancy, almost keeping pace with those letting their licenses lapse. See www.hamdata. com FCC data page. Still no comment, "Slow?" :-) 1: No more automatic renewals. Individuals must retest and pass all elements required for their license class. Wow...you will be REALLY popular with VEs...FCC too... 2: The passing score for written exams needs to be raised to 85%. Wayyyy too low. 100%! Nothing less... 3: Code elements should be 13 wpm for General, and 20 wpm for Extra. Wayyyy too low. 30 WPM for General, 80 WPM for Extra! 4: Make the no-code license one year non-renewable. Make it two weeks. It's fairly obvious you've just alienated half of your "brotherhood"! [better armor your lead-in...] Let's take back ham radio. Why? Was it kidnapped? Lost along with Apollo 11 data? BRING BACK SPARK! The very first RF transmitter in amateur radio! Preserve the past! Honor "sparky" tradition! Hey, "Slow," here's a better idea: Let's get you to a cryogenic chamber and FREEZE you and your longing for times of your youth. You want everything FROZEN, don't you? Cool? Cool... Pax. |
license renewal
wrote in message oups.com... From: Slow Code on Fri, Aug 18 2006 4:26 pm 2: The passing score for written exams needs to be raised to 85%. Wayyyy too low. 100%! Nothing less... Hey now wait a minute, 85% is probably the absolute best he (SC) could do - thus making that the ceiling! So, if you make it 100% - he too wouldn't be licensed! DAMNED........... that would be a shame. :) L. |
Lennie Confuses His Amateur Radio Rant's for His Marital Bed Again
|
Lennie Confuses His Amateur Radio Rant's for His Marital Bed Again
Not Lloyd wrote: "K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... wrote: Let's get you to a cryogenic chamber and FREEZE you and your longing for times of your youth. You want everything FROZEN, don't you? Cool? Cool... Poor Lennie...All that make-believe experience going to waste on a make-believe life. (but..but...his wife has two Masters degrees in the medical arena...doesn't that count for something?) Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh....No...She does NOT have degrees in the "medical" arena...She's a correspondence school psych graduate. And if she can't exert some control over his behaviour on line (if she indeed knows what he does, which I SERIOUSLY doubt), then I can only doubt that she was ever remotely credible as a shrink. Steve, K4YZ |
Lennie Confuses His Amateur Radio Rant's for His Marital Bed Again
|
Lennie Confuses His Amateur Radio Rant's for His Marital Bed Again
"K4YZ" wrote in message ups.com... Not Lloyd wrote: "K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... wrote: Let's get you to a cryogenic chamber and FREEZE you and your longing for times of your youth. You want everything FROZEN, don't you? Cool? Cool... Poor Lennie...All that make-believe experience going to waste on a make-believe life. (but..but...his wife has two Masters degrees in the medical arena...doesn't that count for something?) Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh....No...She does NOT have degrees in the "medical" arena...She's a correspondence school psych graduate. And if she can't exert some control over his behaviour on line (if she indeed knows what he does, which I SERIOUSLY doubt), then I can only doubt that she was ever remotely credible as a shrink. Steve, K4YZ .... Well, it was, after all, Lennie's spin. For whatever that was worth. Len ruined his attempts at credibility when Stagger Lee "outed" Len for posting over the call sign of an Amateur operator who Len apparently disliked. Stagger even outed/traced Lennie's IP address to the military base Len was then employed at. Len is a blowgut. Simple as that. Pay him no heed. |
Lennie Confuses His Amateur Radio Rant's for His Marital Bed Againis Amy Fireproof?
|
It's amazing what people will say to try to justify dumbing down Amateur Radio.
Nada Tapu wrote in
: On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 21:07:15 -0500, "wa0kbz" wrote: Glen Don't know if I 100% agree with your code speeds but I do thing the NO Code should be for 1 year and none renewable. I had to take my license in front of the FCC and not so VE who may or may not help you out to get a license. As I am a big VHFer I don't know how these NO Code guys are going to understand beacons. They are all code and most at 10 ~ 20 wpm. I guess the next thing will be, they will want all beacons either digital or voice. YUK! Not up in the GHZ range yet but maybe some day. 73, Bill, WA0KBZ Right on, Bill! Thanks for your thoughts. NT It's funny, and most telling. The no-code hams have everything over 30 MHz, but it's the code hams that are the one's moving ham radio forward and doing anything technical wise. I guess the no-coders are still trying to figure things out. SC |
It's amazing what people will say to try to justify dumbing downAmateur Radio.
Slow Code wrote:
It's funny, and most telling. The no-code hams have everything over 30 MHz, but it's the code hams that are the one's moving ham radio forward and doing anything technical wise. If that's true, it's certainly a change from half a century ago when we HF hams observed the VHF/UHF hams revolutionizing amateur radio with their technical expertise. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
It's amazing what people will say to try to justify dumbing down Amateur Radio.
"Cecil Moore" wrote in message m... Slow Code wrote: It's funny, and most telling. The no-code hams have everything over 30 MHz, but it's the code hams that are the one's moving ham radio forward and doing anything technical wise. If that's true, it's certainly a change from half a century ago when we HF hams observed the VHF/UHF hams revolutionizing amateur radio with their technical expertise. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com Not at all. As usual, SC is again proving he is a bitter little man. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:19 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com