Let's take back ham radio!
 

On 27 Aug 2006 13:37:53 -0700, a welfare ham wrote:

in a time where numbers are declining but that does not maater to al
since the No Code techs are not hams anyway according to AL

Indeed you're not.

----
In message .com,
makes a death threat when he writes "the mostly
ooccasion [sic] where where you might it will be seconds before you
die."

Let's take back ham radio!
 

get help wrote:
On 27 Aug 2006 13:37:53 -0700, a welfare ham wrote:

in a time where numbers are declining but that does not maater to al
since the No Code techs are not hams anyway according to AL

Indeed you're not.

ah but we are indeed we are almost the majority of ham now now

Let's take back ham radio!
 

On 27 Aug 2006 15:28:24 -0700, a welfare ham wrote:

get help wrote:
On 27 Aug 2006 13:37:53 -0700, a welfare ham wrote:

in a time where numbers are declining but that does not maater to al
since the No Code techs are not hams anyway according to AL

Indeed you're not.

ah but we are indeed we are almost like vermin now

Indeed you are.

----
In message om,
wrote "If I want a cock I go for a man if I
want pussy I go fo r a fmeale simple as that [sic]"

Let's take back ham radio!
 

get help wrote:
On 27 Aug 2006 15:28:24 wrote:

get help wrote:

ah but we are indeed we are almost like vermin now

Indeed you are.
you are a forger poor loser

Let's take back ham radio!
 

"an old freind" wrote in message
oups.com...

get help wrote:
On 27 Aug 2006 13:37:53 -0700, a welfare ham
wrote:

in a time where numbers are declining but that does not maater to al
since the No Code techs are not hams anyway according to AL

Indeed I'm not.

--
Mark caught forging using Steve's name.
"Steve's" post has headers:

X-Complaints-To:
X-Submitted-By: 66.82.9.42

Your reply contains headers:

NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.82.9.42
Injection-Info: 38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.82.9.42

'Nuff said.

www.marksspamblog.blogspot.com

Let's take back ham radio!
 

"get help" wrote in message
...
On 27 Aug 2006 15:28:24 -0700, a welfare ham
wrote:

get help wrote:
On 27 Aug 2006 13:37:53 -0700, a welfare ham
wrote:

in a time where numbers are declining but that does not maater to al
since the No Code techs are not hams anyway according to AL

Indeed you're not.

ah but we are indeed we are almost like vermin now

Indeed I am

--
Mark caught forging using Steve's name.
"Steve's" post has headers:

X-Complaints-To:
X-Submitted-By: 66.82.9.42

Your reply contains headers:

NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.82.9.42
Injection-Info: 38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.82.9.42

'Nuff said.


--
Great. An antagonistic dyslexic in a sea of ambiguous text.

Let's take back ham radio!
 

On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:49:38 -0400, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:57:46 -0500, "Not Lloyd" anon@anon wrote:


"an old freind" wrote in message
roups.com...

get help wrote:
On 27 Aug 2006 13:37:53 -0700, a welfare ham
wrote:

in a time where numbers are declining but that does not maater to al
since the No Code techs are not hams anyway according to AL

Indeed I'm a
poor forger

So why do you forge?

http://marksspamblog.blogspot.com

----
In message . com,
Mark Morgan replied "yes I did. your point?" when accused of
confessing publicly to having beer enemas.

Let's take back ham radio!
 

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:57:46 -0500, "Not Lloyd" anon@anon wrote:


"an old freind" wrote in message
roups.com...

get help wrote:
On 27 Aug 2006 13:37:53 -0700, a welfare ham
wrote:

in a time where numbers are declining but that does not maater to al
since the No Code techs are not hams anyway according to AL

Indeed I'm am
yup, im a poor forger
www.marksspamblog.blogspot.com

--
Mark caught forging using Steve's name.
"Steve's" post has headers:

X-Complaints-To:
X-Submitted-By: 66.82.9.42

Your reply contains headers:

NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.82.9.42
Injection-Info: 38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.82.9.42

'Nuff said.

Let's take back ham radio!
 

Not Lloyd wrote:

yup, im a poor forger
www.marksspamblog.blogspot.com
yes you are a poor forger

Let's take back ham radio!
 

The Kat wrote in
:

On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 01:06:22 -0400, Al Klein
wrote:



WHY in the **** are you continuing this thread
in a SCANNER newsgroup??




Lumber Cartel (tinlc) #2063. Spam this account at your own risk.



Hey,

This thread is about CW and ham radio. You scanner assholes stay
out of it. Go find some police or fireman to listen to.

Sc