Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: why Does the CAP suport and endorse Officers of the CAP lying about the existance of whole military iuntis and support their offcier hounding USA army vet and the libel of US Navy vet CAP does? yes it does Where...?!?! Provide us with a scan of SOME official statement by CAP that "supports" anyone's comments in this forum, Morkie. Where does CAP express this support, and where did anyone represent themselves to be acting on CAP's behalf in such actions? by refusing to take action against a CAP officer that fails to grant military coutestsy to veterans of the real armed forces YOU are NOT due any military courtesy, Mork. First and foremeost, you're NOT a veteran and you're certainly NOT an officer. Only members of the Armed Forces (and thier Guard and Reserve components), the Commander-in-Chief, the Service Secretaries, awardees of the Congressional Medal of Honor, Veterans receiving Final Honors, uncased Colors of the United States and Allied nations and foreign heads-of-state are DUE military courtesies. Those courtesies MAY be extended to certain other dignitaries or family members of deceased servicemembers or dignitaries on a case-by-case basis. Retirees are granted those same courtesies when/where practical. You, having never met any of those criteria, get squat. And even if you were the "NCO" you claimed to have been, you would STILL be junior to me, enlisted or otherwise. Even USAF and USCG Auxiliary members are not "due" military courtesies, except by thier own memberships. Same is rendered at the discretion of the senior Armed Forces servicemember present, although Auxiliary members will always render them to uniformed officers. Again, that leaves YOU out! No one here has posted AS a CAP member or in an "official" capacity. Your continued assault on CAP IS stalking. Despite having been asked this question over and over for months now, you still have yet to provide any evidence that CAP is somehow responsible for comments made by private citizens. No one in this forum has posted ANYthing in this forum in an "official" capacity for ANY organization. So why do you insist on stalking that organization? Since you insist on posting much of your deceit and rhetoric via an AMSAT alias, maybe we should start bombarding AMSAT with demands to "discipline" you...?!?!? Steve, K4YZ |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: why Does the CAP suport and endorse Officers of the CAP lying about the existance of whole military iuntis and support their offcier hounding USA army vet and the libel of US Navy vet CAP does? yes it does Where...?!?! is Amy Fireproof? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
AB5S WT 05-235 Comments to FCC | Policy | |||
The FAQ (Well, Question 1, at least) | Homebrew | |||
The FAQ (Well, Question 1, at least) | General | |||
The main problem with Ham radio... | Policy | |||
Low reenlistment rate | Policy |