RadioBanter - Anyone ever hear AB8MQ on the radio?

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)

- Policy (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/)

- - Anyone ever hear AB8MQ on the radio? (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/103366-re-anyone-ever-hear-ab8mq-radio.html)

Anyone ever hear AB8MQ on the radio?

wrote:

On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 01:39:05 +0000 (UTC), get help
wrote:

Sounds just like you, Mark.

realy and how time have I ever gone on voice?

I rarely do
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

Scheissman just wants to blame others for his jamming episodes a few
years back when he was running 20 meters and trying albeit weakly to jam
some people on 14.275, 3.950, 14.313 and other frequencies

Anyone ever hear AB8MQ on the radio?

"Billy Smith" wrote in message
ink.net...
wrote:

On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 01:39:05 +0000 (UTC), get help
wrote:

Sounds just like you, Mark.

realy and how time have I ever gone on voice?

I rarely do
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

You claiming your boasts of EME were done via CW? Oh, wait, you DID use
voice, but you were conversing with low power, unconfirmed stations....

Anyone ever hear AB8MQ on the radio?

Billy Smith wrote:
Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:

Billy Smith wrote:

wrote:

On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 01:39:05 +0000 (UTC), get help
wrote:

Sounds just like you, Mark.

realy and how time have I ever gone on voice?

I rarely do
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

Hey, Lardass, why did the FCC recently DF you on 20 meters?

Interesting that you received letters about it. Would you like us to
repost them again?

Repost them all you want. Thay don't prove Roger was jamming. He never
got any fines nor was his license suspended.

NOTE: Issuance by the FCC of a Warning Notice indicates that the FCC
has what it believes to be reliable evidence of possible rules
infractions and not necessarily that the recipient has violated FCC
rules. The FCC has the authority, pursuant to §97.519(d)(2) of the
rules to readminister any examination element previously administered
by a volunteer examiner.

Just like you were jamming 14.313.

Wrong again, dumb****. You can't read can you?

NOTE: Issuance by the FCC of a Warning Notice indicates that the FCC
has what it believes to be reliable evidence of possible rules
infractions and not necessarily that the recipient has violated FCC
rules.

woger: kook on parade

Not Lloyd wrote:
"Billy Smith" wrote in message
ink.net...
wrote:

On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 01:39:05 +0000 (UTC), get help
wrote:

Sounds just like you, Mark.

realy and how time have I ever gone on voice?

I rarely do
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

You claiming your boasts of EME were done via CW?
nope I never made such a claim

they were done via JT65B, a digital mode, not voice not CW

Oh, wait, you DID use
voice, but you were conversing with low power, unconfirmed stations....

nope you can't get it right

Markie liar and kook on parade

an old fraud wrote:
Not Lloyd wrote:
"Billy Smith" wrote in message
ink.net...
wrote:

On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 01:39:05 +0000 (UTC), get help
wrote:

Sounds just like you, Mark.

realy and how time have I ever gone on voice?

I rarely do
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

You claiming your boasts of EME were done via CW?
nope I never made such a claim

they were done via JT65B, a digital mode, not voice not CW

No, you lied and talked to unlicensed stations.

Oh, wait, you DID use
voice, but you were conversing with low power, unconfirmed stations....

nope you can't get it right

You admitted it on here, dumb****.

woger: kook on parade

woger: lying kook on parade http://www.mipsor.state.mi.us/mipsor/default.htm

woger try http://www.mipsor.state.mi.us/mipsor/default.htm

wrote:

..woger try http://www.mipsor.state.mi.us/*mipsor/default.htm
where the state of Michigan makes clear I am not