|
Gee...What A Coincidence, Lennie...
|
Gee...What A Coincidence, Lennie...
jawod wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: BTW, this "Jawod" signed a message on rec.radio.amateur.homebrew as "AB8O." I found a blank on that call sign at QRZ. What a coincidence...I used QRZ's database search engine and found a blank when I entered "Leonard H. Anderson". Funny, eh...?!?! I am not "Leonard H. Anderson" I know you're not. I was jabbing Lennie in the ribs about supposedly not finding someone (you?) under a certain call when HE'S not in there either. Never has been. Sorry for the confusion. Steve, K4YZ |
Gee...What A Coincidence, Lennie...
K4YZ wrote:
jawod wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: BTW, this "Jawod" signed a message on rec.radio.amateur.homebrew as "AB8O." I found a blank on that call sign at QRZ. What a coincidence...I used QRZ's database search engine and found a blank when I entered "Leonard H. Anderson". Funny, eh...?!?! I am not "Leonard H. Anderson" I know you're not. I was jabbing Lennie in the ribs about supposedly not finding someone (you?) under a certain call when HE'S not in there either. Never has been. Sorry for the confusion. Steve, K4YZ I'm not in hiding. No worries. 73, John AB8O |
Gee... Robesin wastes system resources on futile QRZ searches...
From: on Sat, Sep 23 2006 1:51 pm
K4YZ wrote: wrote: Opus- wrote: On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 08:19:27 -0400, jawod spake What a coincidence...I used QRZ's database search engine and found a blank when I entered "Leonard H. Anderson". Funny, eh...?!?! Funny? No. Stupid? Yes. I guess the only excercise you ever get is your exercise in futility. Even Len will tell you that he's not a ham, but you knew that already. The USMC imposter feels compelled to vent hate against all who disbelieve him. shrug Never mind that he has NEVER made available ANY third-party proof of his alleged 18-year USMC career. He feels that everyone "must" believe his words and never mind any proof. Back in 1998-1999 on FCC 98-143 ("Reconstruction NPRM) there DID exist a licensed radio amateur named Leonard H. Anderson...but his mailing address was in Montana, not California where I've been since 1956. When I checked QRZ under AB8O, the bio page was there but all response data had been deleted. Why I have no idea. One will have to ask John (AB8O, "Jawod") about that. Out of curiosity last year ( two years ago?) I did a Search for my name. It is somewhat common, surname certainly, given name slightly. Interesting results: A USMC Major (a real one) with the Navy's Blue Angels was named Leonard Anderson. :-) Think about that: USMC, a real commissioned officer, and good enough to fly as part of the Blue Angels! Kind of beats this "CAP Captain" posing in a used poopy suit with snot on his moustache. Poor CAP man is only single-engine rated yet loved to say he was "pilot in command!" :-) There was a black actor in an entertainment registry named Leonard Anderson. Buff, hunky guy maybe 30. There was a white music teacher named Leonard Anderson, maybe coming up on 50, not a "hunk" but appreciated by his school and community. A quick name search at QRZ this morning turns up three licensed US radio amateurs named Leonard Anderson, but none of them have the same middle initial. Now all that is really irrelevant except to members of the morseketeers in here, namely Heil. In order not to offend his apparent sensibilities, one MUST have a valid amateur radio license in order to talk about obtaining an amateur radio license! That is to avoid "telling him what to do!" :-) NB: NO ONE can tell Heil what to do. He tells all others what to do. :-) This is all so hilarious! :-) |
Is the code requirement really keeping good people out of ham radio?
wrote: On 22 Sep 2006 20:46:15 -0700, " wrote: Opus- wrote: If it is eliminated, will that change the "Service"? Maybe. Probably not. Heh heh...if the test is eliminated the expressed outrage, anguish, and horror will be a horrendous wail never to be silenced until the last code key is pried from cold, dead fingers! :-) well I am hopeing some of them will be silenced chlucting at their hearts when they read the R&O Careful, Mark, we can't say such things due to "threats" against the pro-coders. :-) They are muy touchy about threats against Them. That sounds fair. In general I've approved what Industry Canada does on communications regulations...a bit more than what the FCC does for US civil radio services. indeed if they had been willing say 10 years ago to go along with what Canada has now (which was proposed by members of NCI) this would be over long since Well, Mark, it is like this: Some of those who have the cool HOBBY of amateur radio think they are "servicemen" in the "service of their country" for having that hobby. We can't say nasty to them because that is not "nice." They rank themselves as equivalent to soldiers, sailors, and airmen. They want the ILLUSION that they are doing great and meritorious SERVICE. Especially the morseketeers. That is important to them. The illusion, that is. Screw the reality part of it, that doesn't apply to them (they think). Never mind that US amateur radio licensee numbers are holding static with a slight downturn over the past three years. Oldsters are signing off permanently and newcomers are going in through the no-code-test Technician class. Most of the latter are STAYING no-code. [General Of The Amateurs Miccolis says otherwise but then he loves cooking the stats to suit his own taste] As time goes on with the code test gone, the amateur bands WILL change. But, it will be slow since humans are living longer now. Human attrition will, nonetheless, happen. Oldsters don't want to think about that but it is inevitable to all of us. The oldsters want to preserve the illusion that they are still "young," believing in the old, antiquated ways they were impressed with. Why some even believe they are a "service to the country" by having that hobby. There's no argument with those ancient morseketeers, certainly no "discussion." To them, all must be preserved. [read mummified] Ptui. |
Gee... Robesin wastes system resources on futile QRZ searches...
wrote:
Now all that is really irrelevant except to members of the morseketeers in here, namely Heil. In order not to offend his apparent sensibilities, one MUST have a valid amateur radio license in order to talk about obtaining an amateur radio license! That is to avoid "telling him what to do!" :-) You don't have an amateur radio license. I have taken no action in attempting to prevent you from posting here. I have taken no action to preclude your comments to the FCC. Therefore, your statement is false. I am not bound to accept your often outrageous statements without responding. Ridiculing you or laughing at you is not forbidden. Deal with it. NB: NO ONE can tell Heil what to do. You certainly may not tell me what to do. You have no power over me at all. Deal with it. He tells all others what to do. :-) That, like the balance of your statement above, is an untruth. This is all so hilarious! :-) It certainly is, especially when you think that others are laughing *with* you. |
Is the code requirement really keeping good people out of ham radio?
Opus- wrote in
: On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 08:19:27 -0400, jawod spake thusly: Who the **** are YOU to make such a statement? You snot nosed, arrogant PRICK! You do NOT know the kind of person that I am!! Wake up and smell the cappuccino! Code is obsolete! Knowing code does NOTHING to make somebody an "asset to the service". And, could you explain what makes a person an "asset to the service"? Jeez, Chill out, eh? Sorry, but I get upset with people who make statements that are easily taken as personal insults. SNIP It's hilarious watching how violent CB'er hams get. ROFL. How's your Code practice coming along? SC |
Is the code requirement really keeping good people out of ham radio?
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 23:59:03 GMT, Slow Code spake
thusly: Opus- wrote in : On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 08:19:27 -0400, jawod spake thusly: Who the **** are YOU to make such a statement? You snot nosed, arrogant PRICK! You do NOT know the kind of person that I am!! Wake up and smell the cappuccino! Code is obsolete! Knowing code does NOTHING to make somebody an "asset to the service". And, could you explain what makes a person an "asset to the service"? Jeez, Chill out, eh? Sorry, but I get upset with people who make statements that are easily taken as personal insults. SNIP It's hilarious watching how violent CB'er hams get. ROFL. ****, but you're stupid. Where is the violence? But that is typical of bigots. Always deflecting, never answering..usually because they lack the ability. How's your Code practice coming along? I'm not, nor will I ever. If code means associating with bigots like you, then I want no part of it. Much rather talk to civilized people. |
KB9RQZ Says Learning Code is EASY!
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:33 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com