Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 08:47:14 -0400, "Dee Flint"
spake thusly: "Opus-" wrote in message .. . [snip] Sorry, but I can say for an absolute fact that your 're wrong. It had kept me out of ham radio and I know exactly what kind of person that I am. And before the obligatory "lazy" word is trotted out, I have to work for the pay cheque that buys the radio, pays the rent for the building that the radio is in and pays for the tower that is in the back yard. I have to work extra to pay MORE for a place where I am allowed a tower, as opposed to less expensive digs. Honestly, I can't believe how some pro-coders look down on no-coders with such contempt. I was once a member of a "live steam" model railroad club. These were larger model steam trains that ran with real steam instead of electric power. They could be run with either propane or coal, depending on the individual. The guys who built their locomotives from scratch NEVER looked down on the guys who bought theirs from a classified ad. The guys burning coal did NOT call the propane guys "lazy". We all enjoyed a fine hobby and club meetings were always good fun and most informative. It was great for a mechanic, like myself, to rub shoulders with experienced retired machinists who built these locomotives. At one of our "open houses", which were located outdoors at the club track, my daughter took her first steps. Isn't ham radio supposed to be like that? Is there no camaraderie? Yes ham radio is supposed to be camaraderie. People are supposed to help each other. The divisiveness stems from the fact that too many no-coders appear to want to change the requirements with no knowledge, experience, or understanding of the requirements. In addition, most of us have experienced people who said they could not learn code but upon questioning find that they did not use a good training method and did not train correctly. Yet when they decided they were tired of waiting did learn it and got their upgrade. Then finding out how useful it was in ham pursuits were glad that they had done it. That does NOT justify the snot-nosed attitude. So far of each of the reasons that people put forth as to why they can't learn it have been disproven by the example of other people with the same problem having gone ahead and done it. The 5wpm level is obtainable although some of the problem do make faster speeds a problem (constant tinnitus may be a severe problem at 20 wpm for example). My ex-OM had 70% hearing loss in both ears and severe tinnitus. He passed the 5wpm. I know people with dyslexia who have passed. The blind have passed. Even the deaf have passed using flashing lights or vibrating pads. Bravo for them. But that does not explain why some pro-coders are such snot-rags. Do you have competitions in your model railroading activity? If you enter that competition, you all have to follow the published rules with no exceptions. If it is a competition for the "homebrewers", then those who don't do so can enjoy viewing them but they cannot enter into the competition. No competitions, just a bunch of guys who like live steam model trains. The club did not exist for that. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
shortwv | Shortwave | |||
178 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402  June 25, 2004 | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402  June 25, 2004 | General | |||
214 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (09-APR-04) | Shortwave |