Here is how we can end all the silly antenna questions on the repeaters and on usenet.
 

Well said.

"james" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 16:52:24 -0400, "Fred G."
wrote:

+++Neither the Code NOR Theory tests will weed out the bad radio operator
any
+++more than a driving test will weed out the DUIs - OR - the Physical
agility,
+++legal and other exams will weed out bad cops. Those tests are only
tests of
+++"Proficiency" in the subject matter - NOT - "Mentality". Those tests
won't
+++stop the trash.
+++But those who choose to not learn code will continue to bitch about
why they
+++shouldn't. OK, DROP the code........Next you'll want the "Theory"
taken away
+++too. Want to bet?
+++
+++Fred G.
*******************

Fred

The theory questions even the extra exam is not that difficult. A
decent electronics tech with an AA degree can master that test. In
fact the tests are so dummied down that just about anyone that has the
ability read and comprehend can pass them with the minimal of
coaching. So if you think so highly your "Theory" tests then I hate to
burst your bubble.

Why should proficiency in one means of communication hender operation
in another? I tend to think that those that are very proficient with
morse code tend to spend more of their time with that mode of
communication. Why should there be a limitation on other modes that do
not wish to use that mode? Most hams learn morse code and then forget
it. I have no issue with showing proficiency in a means of
communication to get priviledges. I have no issues with showing a
proficiency with "theory" as a means of priviledges.

The thing here is usage of the airwaves is a priviledge and not a
right. So what ever the government cares to do in this avenue is fine
with me. I will take advantage of what ever they offer me.

james