In addition, a whopping 78% of Americans are afraid that the Dems will
cut and run. It seems that the vote was a protest vote and that the
Dems are still on the wrong side of public opinion. Source: Reuters
(Look the rest up yourself.)

On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 12:34:01 +0000 (UTC), Lloyd
wrote:

In addition, a whopping 78% of Americans are afraid that the Dems will
cut and run. It seems that the vote was a protest vote and that the
Dems are still on the wrong side of public opinion. Source: Reuters
(Look the rest up yourself.)

Who gives a **** dip****? So why don't you cut and run to the
refrigerator and make yourself a crow sandwich?

Not Lloyd wrote:
"jawod" wrote in message ...
it means you're trying to kill us. You liberals are more

concerned about terrorist rights than terrorist deaths.

SC


You neocons spill American blood to fill your pockets with petro
dollars. Neocons CREATED the terrorists.
**

Bill Clinton commuted the sentences of numerous terrorists and gave them
their walking papers.

Is Clinton a neocon?



the mujahadeen were created and supported and even ARMED by the CIA
during Bushie I.
The real terrorists are Saudis...
both Bushies have been in bed with them for years.

I know of no terrorists commuted by Clinton.

jawod wrote:

Not Lloyd wrote:
"jawod" wrote in message ...
it means you're trying to kill us. You liberals are more

concerned about terrorist rights than terrorist deaths.

SC


You neocons spill American blood to fill your pockets with petro
dollars. Neocons CREATED the terrorists.
**

Bill Clinton commuted the sentences of numerous terrorists and gave them
their walking papers.

Is Clinton a neocon?



the mujahadeen were created and supported and even ARMED by the CIA
during Bushie I.
The real terrorists are Saudis...
both Bushies have been in bed with them for years.

I know of no terrorists commuted by Clinton.

Think Puerto Rico and the answer will come to you, boy.

On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 12:34:01 +0000 (UTC), Lloyd
wrote:

In addition, a whopping 78% of Americans are afraid that the Dems will
cut and run. It seems that the vote was a protest vote and that the
Dems are still on the wrong side of public opinion. Source: Reuters
(Look the rest up yourself.)

No. You show us.

http://elections.us.reuters.com/?WTm...t-Top2-GoTo-11

On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 12:23:01 -0600, wrote:
I am a retard.I can't follow up?
cuhulin

Maybe it's webtv that won't allow you. Here's an excerpt from the Reuters
story that the retards couldn't find (it's been all over the Sunday cable
talkathons too):

"... even more said they were concerned about some of the actions a
Democratic Congress might take, including 78 percent who were somewhat
or very concerned that it would seek too hasty a withdrawal of troops
from Iraq.

"Another 69 percent said they were concerned that the new Congress would
keep the administration "from doing what is necessary to combat
terrorism," and two-thirds said they were concerned it would spend too
much time investigating the administration and Republican scandals."

-- Reuters @ http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N11417154.htm

[Guvf fcnpr erfreirq sbe gur ergneqf gb fcva gur fgbel.]

On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 19:48:09 +0000 (UTC), Lloyd
wrote:

On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 12:23:01 -0600, wrote:
I am a retard.I can't follow up?
cuhulin

Maybe it's webtv that won't allow you. Here's an excerpt from the Reuters
story that the retards couldn't find (it's been all over the Sunday cable
talkathons too):

"... even more said they were concerned about some of the actions a
Democratic Congress might take, including 78 percent who were somewhat
or very concerned that it would seek too hasty a withdrawal of troops
from Iraq.

"Another 69 percent said they were concerned that the new Congress would
keep the administration "from doing what is necessary to combat
terrorism," and two-thirds said they were concerned it would spend too
much time investigating the administration and Republican scandals."

-- Reuters @ http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N11417154.htm

++++++++++
I see you skipped over the part where the Shrub's approval rating fell
from a low of 35% to a new low of 31%. Thus, notwithstanding any
concerns, the voters found the need to pull the rug out from under the
Shrub to be compelling.

[Guvf fcnpr erfreirq sbe gur ergneqf gb fcva gur fgbel.]

On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 19:48:09 +0000 (UTC), Lloyd
wrote:

On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 12:23:01 -0600, wrote:
I am a retard.I can't follow up?
cuhulin

Maybe it's webtv that won't allow you. Here's an excerpt from the Reuters
story that the retards couldn't find (it's been all over the Sunday cable
talkathons too):

"... even more said they were concerned about some of the actions a
Democratic Congress might take, including 78 percent who were somewhat
or very concerned that it would seek too hasty a withdrawal of troops
from Iraq.

"Another 69 percent said they were concerned that the new Congress would
keep the administration "from doing what is necessary to combat
terrorism," and two-thirds said they were concerned it would spend too
much time investigating the administration and Republican scandals."

-- Reuters @ http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N11417154.htm

[Guvf fcnpr erfreirq sbe gur ergneqf gb fcva gur fgbel.]


It says ''concerned'', not ''afraid''.

X-rated Vermonter wrote in
:

On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 01:18:49 GMT, Slow Code wrote:

Why don't you go learn Morse in Arabic so you can spend your spare
time looking to intercept terrorist messages?


ROTFLMAO!

At least then he would stop bothering the rest of us!

wrote in
:

Nawwwwww,,,,, I better not say that one.m II would start having a field
day on it.
cuhulin


No. It doesn't take much to stimulate a Canadian after they pop about 30
viagra and show up on usenet ready for pumping.

SC