Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: Iitoi on Tues, Dec 12 2006 6:20 am
I found the below FAQ on the web, but can't find the referenced newsgroup on any server? Looks like it could be the salvation of RRAP? I think it won't and for several reasons: 1. Nothing has been done/proposed to stop the incessant cross-posting of the same material to other news- groups. [see "Slow Code" as prime example lately] 2. Effective moderation can only be done by HOLDING all submitted messages/replies for review prior to public posting. [labor-intensive work for moderators, almost a 24-hour a day task] 3. Some moderation is possible by a mechanism where all moderators can delete postings not fitting guidelines. When the "attention-getting" posters don't see their postings in public they will be dissuaded from posting more later. Only a rare few will persist. The above would seem impossible with the Internet as-is and the wide distribution (and rapidity of such) in the 'Web. Somewhere, someplace on the 'Web such postings would remain in public view; Google can only control what is on Google. 4. As one who has a few years experience in moderation on a Bulletin Board System, moderation is possible ONLY with a "closed system," i.e., one where postings go no further than the BBS and moderators have a greater range of controls from the Sysop than do ordinary subscribers. Even then it is possible to have postings remain on-line for hours, begin more arguments and name-calling before moderators can access a 'newsgroup' to do moderator actions. Excessive non-guideline activity can only be stopped with subscriber banishment from posting, again effective in a BBS but very difficult to achieve on the Internet (that carries Usenet). 5. A search for "rec.radio.amateur.moderated" items has turned up a few messages dating back to 1998. The "idea" has been kicking around for eight years with NO real action taken. This is akin to government "study groups" doing "studies" on something for a long time and producing NOTHING tangible but lots of words and paper with NO authority to correct anything. The "idea" of a moderated group seems more like wishful thinking than anything else. ________________________________________________ ________________ Welcome to rec.radio.amateur.moderated! This is a moderated newsgroup for amateur radio operators and other people having an interest in the Amateur Radio Service, as defined by national regulations and international treaties. Following are the posting guidelines for this newsgroup. In general, I don't see any real fault (except for one) and these guidelines seem a sincere, honest effort to improve the lot of newsgroups as they exist today. 2.8 Guidelines regarding civility Posters are expected to make factual claims, to debate topics openly and in good faith, and to accept honest criticism, all without provocation or prevarication. At least one professional organization, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), has recognized that such fair dealings are necessary components of ethical conduct, and has incorporated them into its Code of Ethics: http://www.ieee.org/portal/pages/about/whatis/code.html Though the Amateur Radio Service is not a professional endeavor, the moderators strongly feel that the IEEE Code of Ethics is also a worthwhile set of guiding principles for participants in the rec.radio.amateur.moderated newsgroup. The amateur radio service is, by US federal definition, NOT a professional organization. [that is the reason the activity is named as "amateur"] Unfortunately, many amateurs have the imagination to assume they are 'professional' in their operating procedures, jargon, and (to some) their way of life, that is no more than an assumption, perhaps a fantasy of theirs. There is NO such thing as a "professional amateur," itself an oxymoron. The IEEE "Code of Ethics" is for WORK-related activity, the professional part of IEEE members. It is NOT designed as a guideline or code of conduct for messaging. It IS a guideline for ethical (and moral for the most part) BUSINESS activity. As a 33-year member of the IEEE I support that and follow it. But, neither does the IEEE "Code" require me to obey it in ALL things...including my personal opinions on politics, religion, or anything else. I retain a freedom of choice permitted (in the USA) by the Constitution of the United States. That includes a freedom of speech. It would seem obvious to me that this sudden appearance of the IEEE "Code" has come about from other newsgroupies. making unkind replies to me in here...none of which are (or have admitted to being) members of the IEEE. If there are to be "guidline references" then the Amateur's Code written by Paul Segal many decades ago should suffice. However, article two of the Amateur's Code should be re- written to apply to all or none of the amateur membership organizations, not just to patronize a particular US club. Amateur radio can be a fun, engaging, interesting hobby. But, it remains a HOBBY, not some imaginary "professional life activity." There is nothing wrong with hobbies. Many other hobby activities exist without any pretenses at being "professional." [Life Member, IEEE] |