wrote:

I see nothing about this being a demoracy.


Nope, no demoracy here.


Dave K8MN

wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:22:22 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

wrote:

I see nothing about this being a demoracy.


Nope, no demoracy here.

which is JUST the way you want it Dave

Heil Dave!

wrote:
On 11 Jan 2007 09:29:35 -0800, wrote:
wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:22:22 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:
wrote:

I see nothing about this being a demoracy.

Nope, no demoracy here.

which is JUST the way you want it Dave

Heil Dave!

eaxactly

Xackley

wrote:
wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:22:22 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

wrote:

I see nothing about this being a demoracy.

Nope, no demoracy here.
which is JUST the way you want it Dave

Heil Dave!

You wrote "demoracy". I copied your spelling. Mark couldn't see the
difference between your mistake and "democracy". Neither could you.

You guys work well together.

Dave K8MN

Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:22:22 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

wrote:

I see nothing about this being a demoracy.

Nope, no demoracy here.
which is JUST the way you want it Dave

Heil Dave!

You wrote "demoracy". I copied your spelling. Mark couldn't see the
difference between your mistake and "democracy". Neither could you.

And you wonder why people think you're a prick.

wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:22:22 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

wrote:

I see nothing about this being a demoracy.
Nope, no demoracy here.
which is JUST the way you want it Dave
Heil Dave!
You wrote "demoracy". I copied your spelling. Mark couldn't see the
difference between your mistake and "democracy". Neither could you.

And you wonder why people think you're a prick.

Actually, I don't wonder that. I do understand that you do. I can live
with that. You've been made to look foolish because you didn't
recognize your own error. As you are fond of writing about me, you've
stumbled and skinned your knee on your own mistake. Your "Heil Dave!"
comment didn't work with your "demoracy" and now you feel the need to
lash out.

Go figure!

Enough with the "demoracy"; let's go for demoronization.

Dave K8MN

"Dave Heil" wrote:

Enough with the "demoracy"; let's go for demoronization.

The moderated group will accomplish that, very successfully, IMO.

73
KH6HZ

Dave Heil wrote:
Enough with the "demoracy"; let's go for demoronization.

Maybe a moderated newsgroup will accomplish that function?
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

KH6HZ wrote:
"Dave Heil" wrote:

Enough with the "demoracy"; let's go for demoronization.

The moderated group will accomplish that, very successfully, IMO.

73
KH6HZ

I think that's the basic idea. It may not be Nirvana, but it'll beat
the current situation by a mile.

Dave K8MN

Cecil Moore wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
Enough with the "demoracy"; let's go for demoronization.

Maybe a moderated newsgroup will accomplish that function?

I think it will do that and more.

Dave K8MN