LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7   Report Post  
Old January 22nd 07, 03:33 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,554
Default Now that code is dead, what will we have flame wars over? :-)


Stefan Wolfe wrote:
"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
et...
Stefan Wolfe wrote:
ARRL will eventually petition the FCC to have only one license class.


Oh, no! That would destroy the Bantam Rooster
syndrome and eliminate the pecking order in
the ARS.


Well, it could attempt to become "classless". But it could it really stay
that way?


it certainly could but the likely result will 2 classes at some point
noivice and full becuase the test would get unweldly other wise

but why are you stiring this pot?

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die? Dirk Policy 1057 December 21st 06 01:29 PM
You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life. Slow Code Policy 189 December 14th 06 10:46 AM
Why You Don't Like The ARRL Louis C. LeVine CB 188 January 6th 04 06:05 PM
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC Brian Policy 3 October 24th 03 12:02 AM
Some comments on the NCVEC petition D. Stussy Policy 13 August 5th 03 04:23 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017