2nd RFD: rec.radio.amateur.moderated moderated
 

Paul W. Schleck, K3FU wrote:
...

That is simply TOO MUCH to pick though for the few relevant points,
statements and "facts."

Truth is, rec.radio.amateur.policy has been a hotbed of discussion
focusing on the failed, and sometimes un-spoken/un-written policy's
which have brought amateur radio to its' knees and present precarious
position.

It is true that much of this discussion now centers around the few
dangerous individuals who still spout the same old lies and deception
which have brought about this pathetic condition amateur radio finds
itself in. But, if these individuals attempt to continue the course of
destruction which has caused these present un-spoken policies, I believe
discussion about the methods and goals they are attempting to implement
are VERY valid and ON TOPIC to amateur policy.

There are two kinds of "amateur policy" which have brought us here, both
are valid topics to this newsgroup. You simply look as though you are
attempting to aid the deception.

In the end, none of this will matter, amateur radio will become
bandwidth for the internet--face reality ...

Regards,
JS

2nd RFD: rec.radio.amateur.moderated moderated