|
Schlecks' Schlock!
Dave Heil wrote:
From what I've read here, you might be the first rejected but not the most rejected. Personal ad hominem attacks devoid of any redeeming value will certainly bite the dust in a moderated newsgroup. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Schlecks' Schlock!
" wrote in On Feb 1, 1:10?pm, "Dee Flint" wrote: "Michael Coslo" wrote in message I filter based on content, not whether or not I agree with the poster. My wife walked in one day while I was reading the group and wondered what kind of filthy things I was involved in. If someone is going to post abberant stuff, they go into the bozo bin. As well as people who feel compelled to post hundreds of unreadable messages a day. Agree, except I just don't "filter." I've had long practice in skim-reading to "sort" out what MIGHT be worthwhile to read in more detail. My wife and I have "his and her" computers here in the home office. We can see each others' screens just by turning to glance at them. We DO respect that each of us have different interests in addition to common ones. Heh heh, when I'm doing schematics using Paint, she kids me about "doing dirty pictures again." [they result in very clean schematics, really...:-) ] Telling a person that they are acting stupid is quite different than telling them they are stupid. However my opinion is telling them they are acting stupid is ok, telling them the are stupid is marginal, while name calling is unacceptable (Nun of the Above, Herr Oberst, and so on). Riiiight, and "Foghorn Lenhorn" is perfectly acceptable in addition to "novice in radio" and other snarly epithets. As long as one is a morse code enthusiast (nee' evangelist). If someone acts as arrogant as some have in here they should welcome the "title" they have worked so hard for. If another wants to ruler-spank what he/she thinks are naughty children then they should not be upset when the "children" turn out to be unfriendly to them. There can be safety and security among a group of like-minded. All can sit around and give each other high-fives for being so "brilliant, brave, strong, wise, etc., etc., etc." In there you can severely criticize all who DARE oppose such "brilliant, brave, strong, wise et-ceteras" in complete, but false, presumption that you rule. Self-deception in addition to self-righteousness. I've seen it in action, Len. I belong to one moderated group to get schedules of events. If a disagreeing post makes it onto the board, the "moderator" clamps down and people are wanred on to post any more disagreeing posts. Mike, no sweat, know where you are coming from. Due to chronological age differences, I've been "seeing" that for a half-century-plus...IN radio and away from the 'Net, the BBSs, and all that computer-modem comms things. Computer comms weren't really widespread until around 1980 and my experience goes three decades before that. Been there, done that, might have a garage sale to get rid of all those old T-shirts. :-) The newsgroup is like watching Teletubbies. All nice and cozy, with people saying "I like that", and others saying "yea, I like that too, isn't it wonderful? Yes, it's really wonderful. Isn't ot great that it's wonderful?" Ick. heh heh heh heh heh heh heh heh... Been a LONG time since I baby-sat kiddies watching Satiddy TV shows. But, I CAN envision some purple dinosaurs doing what you describe. Some of them are in here!. We've got the self-defined "Mr. Rogers" types being almost nauseatingly 'pleasant' and absolutely NON- violent but being able to sneer and talk-down the "inferior" types with a SEG all over their phizz. The "ostrich syndrome" is very real in human groupings. Folks WANT to see only what is acceptiable to Them. The parallel is that the world only revolves about Them and Theirs and all who don't go around in Their circles should be "eliminated." Deep down they are both ego-driven and don't have the guts to see/experience REALITY. Reality ain't pleasant 24/7. The universe wan't created to serve Them despite their firm convictions that is was SO (and nyah-nyah). Excuse me, the Masters are calling and expect me to Serve Them. Little do they know what I put in Their cervezas. :-) Irreverently yours, LA |
Schlecks' Schlock!
"KH6HZ" wrote in
: "Mike Coslo" wrote: You remind me that there is a sizable fraction of people in the US who believe that there shouldn't be free speech. Hardly. Please do not put words in my mouth. I'm not putting words in your mouth. Although your sensitivity to the statement is interesting. I fully support the right of folks like Mark Morgan to spew their excrement all they want. However, I also realize that freedom of speech does not mean you are entitled to a free printing press provided by the government. Your freedom of speech does not mean I have to be forced to listen (or read) what you type. Tell me Mike, 1) do you read each and every posting in this newsgroup? 2) Do you have a kill-file, or selectively choose to ignore postings from certain posters? If you answered either No to #1 or Yes to #2, then by your definition you are practicing "censorship", aren't you? Do you read my posts? I've more than once posted that I have maybe a hundred or more posters from the rra groups in my bozo bin. I haven't seen a post from Mr Morgan for a long long time, until he started posting in rec.radio.amateur.antenna when the gang started branching out. That's what prompted me to get Xnews, and all those problems go away. But here is the crucial difference. *I* choose who I see and who I don't see. Not you, not some group of "moderators" who don't like someone, or have arbitrary reasons about what is right or wrong to post. Perhaps you don't understand what might be important about that. Perhaps you like it that way. - 73 de Mike KB3EIA - |
Schlecks' Schlock!
Dave Heil wrote in
ink.net: Mike Coslo wrote: Dave Heil wrote in link.net: Mike Coslo wrote: "KH6HZ" wrote in news:8wOwh.239345$fh6.215432 @newsfe13.lga: Dave Heil wrote: Yep. Nobody has an innate right to post to a newsgroup. Or, as we summarized in our Constitutional Law class in college: "Your right to free speech does not mean you're entitled to a pulpit". You remind me that there is a sizable fraction of people in the US who believe that there shouldn't be free speech. That's not right, Mike. I can write letters to the editors of all the magazines I want. None of them is obliged to print my letters. I can stand up in the middle of a movie theater and espouse some political opinion. I'll be escorted out. I can attempt to heckle some politician during a speech. I'll be shown the door. There are venues where you have a right to speak and venues where you don't have a right to be heard. Hi Dave, There certainly are. But we're not talking about a person in a movie theatre. I'd much prefer to make the decision on whether or not I will see someone's posts than have someone else make that decision for me. That's fine, Mike. If you'd like to continue to post here, you may continue to do so. I have no doubt that you'd be able to post anything you've posted in the past to the moderated group. Possibly. I think I really p****d off one of the moderators though. He was responding to every off topic post with orders to not reply to the posts. I ended up telling him that he was every bit as bad as the sicko's. I expect that he might find problems with my posts. I wouldn't have much recourse, I suppose. Whatever. And there lies the major problem. Those strange folk that live near you are an obvious censor target, as well as those folk who were posting a gazillion flames to each other the last year or so. But what about the moderator who simply doesn't like another person. What about him or her? Are you saying that you believe that the moderators would be likely to not pass through a post base upon not liking someone? I've heard of that. As an example, Cecil and Len are in some people's killfiles. Okay. I certainly understand why one of them might be. Mark is in my killfile. But I enjoy both of them very much. I would assume that anyone who would put Len in a killfile would also censor his posts. I'm not following your logic. I think it is likely that many of Len's posts wouldn't make it in the moderated group--not because of who he is, but because he can't control himself. That is part of the problem. Len has called me a few things in the past - one of my favorites is the "fifth wheel on the four morsemen of the apocolypse". But frankly when he does th einsult thing, I almost always laugh. His humor and approach is caustic. But I can handle that. I have to imagine that you do too. I mean you don't take this stuff seriously, do you. I imagine that you enjoy th everbal dueling that you two do. Sure the old bp might raise for a second or two , but it's good fun. Those "anyones" could be moderators. And Cecil is an enjoyable person to spar with on occasion, as well as a source of knowledge. Cecil is going to be one of the moderators. You think the other moderators are going to stop his posts? There are people who have him killfiled in rraa. Cecil really loves a good argument and is pretty tenacious. A lot of people don't likr that. Heck, I just looked at my bozo bin, and I have a couple hundred people in there at least. I'm a censoring junkie. One weird post about what some guy wants to do to another guy earns a permanent trip to the bin. That's not easy. Some of these guys change their posting names all of the time. Even Mark has oodles of names he posts under. Ain't that the truth. But I fugured that with 4 keystrokes, I could eliminate any one of his different names. I can do that with a lot less effort than he can sign up for new accounts. Why the heck would anyone do that, anyhow? But I'm deciding what shows up on my screen. Others may want other people to decide what they see or don't see. Sheeple. Post here. You can make all of the decisions you like. I don't know why you feel that you have to limit yourself to the moderated group. Of course. Don't confuse me with the people who are worried that they won't be able to carry on their tirades because of moderation. I just have some philosophical problems with moderation. I've seen it strangle groups. Hence my stance that there is a sizable number of people who believe that free speech is a nuisance. You can find all sorts of free speech on this and other newsgroups. Look at what some people choose to do with their right of free speech. I can go to all sorts of places where I limit my right of free speech--the theater I wrote of, a courtroom, a church, a school, a public ceremony. There are also situations where someone's right of free speech infringes my rights. Honestly, what would you do if you didn't have Len to fight with? I suspect you would get bored and eventually stop posting. If and when the moderated group comes into play, I doubt you'll see me post here. According to Len, his time here is coming to an end anyway. I don't need Leonard Anderson to make me complete. Okay. I find it a little surprising though. Most people who stand toe to toe with another person in newsgroups do it because they like it. - 73 de Mike KB3EIA - |
Schlecks' Schlock!
Cecil Moore wrote in news:Cl0xh.57805$wc5.6558
@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net: Dave Heil wrote: Cecil is going to be one of the moderators. You think the other moderators are going to stop his posts? I'm not a moderator, Dave, I'm a technical consultant. And I have already had postings rejected. So what function does a technical consultant serve in theis newsgroup? This gets better all the time! If I make a mistake in a post will it get rejected? - 73 de Mike KB3EIA - |
Schlecks' Schlock!
On Feb 3, 12:22 pm, Dave Heil wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote: Dave Heil wrote: Careful, Cecil! You could be accused of making a prickish remark. How do I prove that it is not a "prickish remark"? :-) There's you'll dilemma. If you question the claim, it'll become "Marvy". Dave K8MN There goes your chances at becoming an ARRL Division Director. |
Schlecks' Schlock!
On Feb 3, 2:52 am, "Arf! Arf!" wrote:
wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 2, 10:36 am, Cecil Moore wrote: wrote: I censor my self daily, ... Would you mind quoting the dictionary definition of "censor" that you are using above? -- 73, Cecil,http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp Why? Are you going to join Dave Heil in playing Headmaster? Can you do any better? I have no interest in playing spelling cop. I usually bring up spelling in response to someone complaining about other people's spelling. WA8ULX and K4YZ/K4CAP were famous for complaining about other people all the while making their own mistakes. K8MN has a need to correct other people as well, and has stated that people who make spelling mistakes shouldn't have positions of leadership. Then he made a spelling error. You could better spend your time coaxing Mark to avail himself of a spell check program instead of making excuses for him. I could? I am not Mark's keeper. I think you could better spend your time by not thinking about me so much. Mark has entered these newsgroups sounding, and typing, like an illiterate idiot. Dyslexia aside, Mark is a barely functional, self-proclaimed savant, and that is being generous. That's because you're such a generous gal. You should know better. At least YOU can be somewhat literate, though there are doubts about that, too. There are? Wow. I had no idea. |
Schlecks' Schlock!
wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 3, 12:22 pm, Dave Heil wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: Dave Heil wrote: Careful, Cecil! You could be accused of making a prickish remark. How do I prove that it is not a "prickish remark"? :-) There's you'll dilemma. If you question the claim, it'll become "Marvy". Dave K8MN There goes your chances at becoming an ARRL Division Director. Two plurals in the same sentence. TSK TSK..... Should have been, "There goes your chance..." or, "There go your chances...." I see a bit of Mark Morgan is rubbing off on you. |
Schlecks' Schlock!
wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 3, 2:52 am, "Arf! Arf!" wrote: wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 2, 10:36 am, Cecil Moore wrote: wrote: I censor my self daily, ... Would you mind quoting the dictionary definition of "censor" that you are using above? -- 73, Cecil,http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp Why? Are you going to join Dave Heil in playing Headmaster? Can you do any better? I have no interest in playing spelling cop. I usually bring up spelling in response to someone complaining about other people's spelling. WA8ULX and K4YZ/K4CAP were famous for complaining about other people all the while making their own mistakes. K8MN has a need to correct other people as well, and has stated that people who make spelling mistakes shouldn't have positions of leadership. Then he made a spelling error. You could better spend your time coaxing Mark to avail himself of a spell check program instead of making excuses for him. I could? I am not Mark's keeper. I think you could better spend your time by not thinking about me so much. Mark has entered these newsgroups sounding, and typing, like an illiterate idiot. Dyslexia aside, Mark is a barely functional, self-proclaimed savant, and that is being generous. That's because you're such a generous gal. You should know better. At least YOU can be somewhat literate, though there are doubts about that, too. There are? Wow. I had no idea. She's right. At the very least, you spell properly. Your sentence structure leaves much to be desired though. |
Schlecks' Schlock!
what copyright would that be Mark?
mine idoit idoit? Open mouth, insert foot, Mark. |
Schlecks' Schlock!
On Feb 3, 10:42 pm, "Miss Buxley" anon@anon wrote:
She's right. At the very least, you spell properly. Your sentence structure leaves much to be desired though.- Yeh, a little. That's just one of my failures in life. Microsoft Word is always turning my stuff red... ****es me off. As if Bill Gates didn't drop out of college. Anyway, I'll try to do better. |
Schlecks' Schlock!
wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 3, 10:42 pm, "Miss Buxley" anon@anon wrote: She's right. At the very least, you spell properly. Your sentence structure leaves much to be desired though.- Yeh, a little. That's just one of my failures in life. Microsoft Word is always turning my stuff red... ****es me off. As if Bill Gates didn't drop out of college. Anyway, I'll try to do better. I appreciate your humor. Thank you. Now, if only we had a small part of Gates' money.... |
Schlecks' Schlock!
|
Schlecks' Schlock!
|
Schlecks' Schlock!
wrote in message ... On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 16:49:47 -0000, "Dean M" wrote: wrote in message . .. On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 01:53:04 -0000, "Dean M" wrote: wrote in message m... On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 18:39:23 -0600, Mike Coslo wrote: for someone who's so into free speech, look what I found on your blog you lack the right to violate my copyright what copyright would that be Mark? mine idoit I assume you meant to refer to you as "idiot"?? and no I do it?? OK well then, I still find nothing that refers to your I DO IT copyright. I suggest you put something in writing and then feel free to take whatever legal action you might want If I so desire, I will "violate" your "I DO IT" blog whenever and wherever I feel. Deal with it I know there were 2 other mentally challenged people in this group but it is obvious you are their KING. I have zero use for someone who obviously prefers themselves to prove repeatedly that they are beyond help Just one last thing, Mark. Please assure me and the rest of the amateur world that you will never upgrade and actually get on the air. I'd hate to think the amateur world would think you an prime example of the United States educational program. I seen "idiot" savant's that handle themselves better than you Sorry thems the facts 73 (or not) Dean http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Schlecks' Schlock!
On Feb 3, 10:39 pm, "Miss Buxley" anon@anon wrote:
wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 3, 12:22 pm, Dave Heil wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: Dave Heil wrote: Careful, Cecil! You could be accused of making a prickish remark. How do I prove that it is not a "prickish remark"? :-) There's you'll dilemma. If you question the claim, it'll become "Marvy". Dave K8MN There goes your chances at becoming an ARRL Division Director. Two plurals in the same sentence. TSK TSK..... Should have been, "There goes your chance..." or, "There go your chances...." I see a bit of Mark Morgan is rubbing off on you. I see David Heil K8MN living out his life without ever having become an ARRL Director. |
Schlecks' Schlock!
"Dean M" wrote:
If I so desire, I will "violate" your "I DO IT" blog whenever and wherever I feel. Deal with it Fair use doctrine allows you to make full use of online blogs to post any followup discussion, etc. you so desire. As long as proper cites are given for the original source, naturally. 73 kh6hz |
Schlecks' Schlock!
"KH6HZ" wrote in message ... "Dean M" wrote: If I so desire, I will "violate" your "I DO IT" blog whenever and wherever I feel. Deal with it Fair use doctrine allows you to make full use of online blogs to post any followup discussion, etc. you so desire. As long as proper cites are given for the original source, naturally. 73 kh6hz I knew that and you knew that, I knew Mark didn't knew that. After all he didn't know what a caterpillar was at the local hamfest, but it seems his "wife" did, although he "taught" "her" everything he knows frightening, isn't it? |
Schlecks' Schlock!
On Feb 4, 11:04 am, "Dean M" wrote:
"KH6HZ" wrote in message ... "Dean M" wrote: If I so desire, I will "violate" your "I DO IT" blog whenever and wherever I feel. Deal with it Fair use doctrine allows you to make full use of online blogs to post any followup discussion, etc. you so desire. As long as proper cites are given for the original source, naturally. 73 kh6hz I knew that and you knew that, I knew Mark didn't knew that. Mark didn't "knew" that? What else doesn't Mark "knew?" After all he didn't know what a caterpillar was at the local hamfest, A caterpillar is the same at a hamfest as it is anywhere else. It is the larval stage of a butterfly or a moth. See: lepidoptera. but it seems his "wife" did, although he "taught" "her" everything he knows As long as you don't claim that he taught her everything that she knows. frightening, isn't it? How so? |
Schlecks' Schlock!
On Feb 4, 1:11 am, Dave Heil wrote:
As I pointed out to you, she is the nice lady who has a lovely home. An unsightly landfill was built next to her home. She built a tall fence so she wouldn't have to look at the landfill. In this story, you play the part of the landfill. Dave K8MN Did you think to get a permit for Len to play this part, or are you running an unpermitted facility? |
Schlecks' Schlock!
"an old friend" wrote:
insisting that my wife is shamle and crap like that Isn't shamle a whale? To the best of my knowledge, we don't allow inter-species marriages yet in the USA. |
Schlecks' Schlock!
wrote:
fair use does not allow the use for the prupose of comiting a crime which is his intent the crime being harrasment Harassment doesn't occur simply because you dislike what someone posts in a public forum. |
Schlecks' Schlock!
"KH6HZ" wrote in message ... "an old friend" wrote: insisting that my wife is shamle and crap like that Isn't shamle a whale? To the best of my knowledge, we don't allow inter-species marriages yet in the USA. That means little to the Morgans. |
Schlecks' Schlock!
On Feb 4, 2:08 pm, "an old friend" wrote:
On Feb 4, 12:46 pm, wrote: On Feb 4, 11:04 am, "Dean M" wrote: "KH6HZ" wrote in message ... "Dean M" wrote: If I so desire, I will "violate" your "I DO IT" blog whenever and wherever I feel. Deal with it Fair use doctrine allows you to make full use of online blogs to post any followup discussion, etc. you so desire. As long as proper cites are given for the original source, naturally. 73 kh6hz I knew that and you knew that, I knew Mark didn't knew that. Mark didn't "knew" that? What else doesn't Mark "knew?" the problem the poster is having is that he is ****ed I don't allow him to post messages on my blog insisting that my wife is shamle and crap like that refusing to help him harras me and my family is seen somehow as oposing free speech by these fellows rather like Robeson it seems- Fuggem. |
Schlecks' Schlock!
wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 4, 11:04 am, "Dean M" wrote: "KH6HZ" wrote in message ... "Dean M" wrote: If I so desire, I will "violate" your "I DO IT" blog whenever and wherever I feel. Deal with it Fair use doctrine allows you to make full use of online blogs to post any followup discussion, etc. you so desire. As long as proper cites are given for the original source, naturally. 73 kh6hz I knew that and you knew that, I knew Mark didn't knew that. Mark didn't "knew" that? What else doesn't Mark "knew?" I don't know, what's knew with you? BTW is this information still correct Brian Burke (614) 833-0979 430 Longview St Pickerington, OH 43147 After all he didn't know what a caterpillar was at the local hamfest, A caterpillar is the same at a hamfest as it is anywhere else. It is the larval stage of a butterfly or a moth. See: lepidoptera. seems Mark saw one at a hamfest and didn't know what it was but his "wife" did but it seems his "wife" did, although he "taught" "her" everything he knows As long as you don't claim that he taught her everything that she knows. I'd hope "she" was a tad more literate than "her" "husband" frightening, isn't it? How so? BTW, Do you always interrupt people when they have conversations that don't involve you? From what I see: Brian Burke (614) 833-0979 430 Longview St Pickerington, OH 43147 this seems to be the case. |
Schlecks' Schlock!
wrote in message ... On 4 Feb 2007 09:46:40 -0800, wrote: On Feb 4, 11:04 am, "Dean M" wrote: "KH6HZ" wrote in message ... "Dean M" wrote: If I so desire, I will "violate" your "I DO IT" blog whenever and wherever I feel. Deal with it Fair use doctrine allows you to make full use of online blogs to post any followup discussion, etc. you so desire. As long as proper cites are given for the original source, naturally. 73 kh6hz I knew that and you knew that, I knew Mark didn't knew that. just trying to make things easier for Mark Mark didn't "knew" that? What else doesn't Mark "knew?" amazing how only I must get thing right well, when you start getting thing right, let us know After all he didn't know what a caterpillar was at the local hamfest, A caterpillar is the same at a hamfest as it is anywhere else. It is the larval stage of a butterfly or a moth. See: lepidoptera. but it seems his "wife" did, although he "taught" "her" everything he knows As long as you don't claim that he taught her everything that she knows. frightening, isn't it? How so? http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Schlecks' Schlock!
"an old friend" wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 4, 12:46 pm, wrote: On Feb 4, 11:04 am, "Dean M" wrote: "KH6HZ" wrote in message ... "Dean M" wrote: If I so desire, I will "violate" your "I DO IT" blog whenever and wherever I feel. Deal with it Fair use doctrine allows you to make full use of online blogs to post any followup discussion, etc. you so desire. As long as proper cites are given for the original source, naturally. 73 kh6hz I knew that and you knew that, I knew Mark didn't knew that. Mark didn't "knew" that? What else doesn't Mark "knew?" the problem the poster is having is that he is ****ed I don't allow him to post messages on my blog insisting that my wife is shamle and crap like that RIGHT, like I would post on your blog...a giant steaming heap of nonsense and what the frack is a shamle perhaps a chamois (like cloth) or a shamrock (like clover) as to crap, well, what I can't answer that but based on what you and 2 other seem to post..OK I'll agree to that refusing to help him harras me and my family is seen somehow as oposing free speech by these fellows rather like Robeson it seems If you aren't for me, you're against me I see Mr. Bush If I don't condemn, then I must condone. You're logic is as bad as your spelling and sentence structure Anyone who doesn't run to your aid and defend your obvious disability is bias and racist?? Is where you live actually on this planet?? Good luck with whatever you do in life In case you need someone bigger to stand up for you, let me introduce you to: Brian Burke amateur callsign: N0IMD (614) 833-0979 430 Longview St Pickerington, OH 43147 I'm sure the 2 of you are perfectly suited for each other caio Dean |
Schlecks' Schlock!
wrote in message ... On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 21:47:59 -0000, "Dean M" wrote: "an old friend" wrote in message groups.com... On Feb 4, 12:46 pm, wrote: On Feb 4, 11:04 am, "Dean M" wrote: "KH6HZ" wrote in message ... "Dean M" wrote: If I so desire, I will "violate" your "I DO IT" blog whenever and wherever I feel. Deal with it Fair use doctrine allows you to make full use of online blogs to post any followup discussion, etc. you so desire. As long as proper cites are given for the original source, naturally. 73 kh6hz I knew that and you knew that, I knew Mark didn't knew that. Mark didn't "knew" that? What else doesn't Mark "knew?" the problem the poster is having is that he is ****ed I don't allow him to post messages on my blog insisting that my wife is shamle and crap like that RIGHT, like I would post on your blog...a giant steaming heap of nonsense you seem to be bitching about about Not really. I asked you, why, as someone who opposes a moderated group as censorship insists on practicing censorship on something he posts on You seem to have difficulty with the concept that you practice the very thing you are opposed to I believe there's a word for that, but it escapes me at the moment Anyone who doesn't run to your aid and defend your obvious disability is bias and racist? never said that at all flushing the rest I am beginning to see why you are so interested in the word crap..you seem to be fixated on toilets and bodily functions http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ (Whgere America comes to be censored) flush right back at ya -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Schlecks' Schlock!
"Dean M" wrote in message ... wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 4, 11:04 am, "Dean M" wrote: "KH6HZ" wrote in message ... "Dean M" wrote: If I so desire, I will "violate" your "I DO IT" blog whenever and wherever I feel. Deal with it Fair use doctrine allows you to make full use of online blogs to post any followup discussion, etc. you so desire. As long as proper cites are given for the original source, naturally. 73 kh6hz I knew that and you knew that, I knew Mark didn't knew that. Mark didn't "knew" that? What else doesn't Mark "knew?" I don't know, what's knew with you? BTW is this information still correct Brian Burke (614) 833-0979 430 Longview St Pickerington, OH 43147 After all he didn't know what a caterpillar was at the local hamfest, A caterpillar is the same at a hamfest as it is anywhere else. It is the larval stage of a butterfly or a moth. See: lepidoptera. seems Mark saw one at a hamfest and didn't know what it was but his "wife" did but it seems his "wife" did, although he "taught" "her" everything he knows As long as you don't claim that he taught her everything that she knows. I'd hope "she" was a tad more literate than "her" "husband" frightening, isn't it? How so? BTW, Do you always interrupt people when they have conversations that don't involve you? From what I see: Brian Burke (614) 833-0979 430 Longview St Pickerington, OH 43147 this seems to be the case. indeed hot ham an chesee not afaid two post wit his indentitty -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Schlecks' Schlock!
wrote in message ... On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 21:38:05 -0000, "Dean M" wrote: wrote in message groups.com... On Feb 4, 11:04 am, "Dean M" wrote: "KH6HZ" wrote in message ... "Dean M" wrote: If I so desire, I will "violate" your "I DO IT" blog whenever and wherever I feel. Deal with it Fair use doctrine allows you to make full use of online blogs to post any followup discussion, etc. you so desire. As long as proper cites are given for the original source, naturally. 73 kh6hz I knew that and you knew that, I knew Mark didn't knew that. Mark didn't "knew" that? What else doesn't Mark "knew?" I don't know, what's knew with you? BTW is this information still correct was never correct get your attributes correct Mark. The post was not directed at you, it was directed at: Brian Buttinski you don't have the right under fair use to steal material for harrasment pruposes nothing to steal. All available right out in the open and how does one harass someone in a public forum. If you don't like something ignore it and the address and phone number I just was a crime on your part too man but you are wise in your criminal action to conceal your YOUR name try that again in English if you're gonna play lawyer, learn sentence structure And I posted my name Dean M. That's my name (albeit missing a few letters on the last part) but still my legal Christian name some folks like me and BB don't have to hide everything we do online I would think about that before speaking for BB. It smacks of something not quite right besides BB =hotham and cheese and you the name of 1000 fake addresses (used only to try and bypass killfilters) really shouldn't be lecturing anyone http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ Voted Crappiest Blog on the Web -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com taa ta super bowl is a calling |
Schlecks' Schlock!
"Miss Buxley" anon@anon wrote in message ... wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 3, 12:22 pm, Dave Heil wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: Dave Heil wrote: Careful, Cecil! You could be accused of making a prickish remark. How do I prove that it is not a "prickish remark"? :-) There's you'll dilemma. If you question the claim, it'll become "Marvy". Dave K8MN There goes your chances at becoming an ARRL Division Director. Two plurals in the same sentence. TSK TSK..... Should have been, "There goes your chance..." or, "There go your chances...." I see a bit of Mark Morgan is rubbing off on you. some folks like me and hot ham an cheesse don't have to hide everything we do online -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Schlecks' Schlock!
On Feb 4, 4:38 pm, "Dean M" wrote:
BTW, Do you always interrupt people when they have conversations that don't involve you? From what I see: Brian Burke (614) 833-0979 430 Longview St Pickerington, OH 43147 What's your point? You have been forbidden to mail anything to that address. |
Schlecks' Schlock!
On Feb 4, 4:38 pm, "Dean M" wrote:
I don't know, what's knew with you? BTW is this information still correct Brian Burke snip You've been reported. |
Schlecks' Schlock!
wrote in message ups.com... On Feb 4, 4:38 pm, "Dean M" wrote: I don't know, what's knew with you? BTW is this information still correct Brian Burke snip You've been reported. What..on TV, radio?? nothing to report there Burke everything is available in the public domain and readily available for all to see and post if so desired |
Schlecks' Schlock!
wrote in message ups.com... On Feb 4, 4:38 pm, "Dean M" wrote: BTW, Do you always interrupt people when they have conversations that don't involve you? From what I see: Brian Burke (614) 833-0979 430 Longview St Pickerington, OH 43147 What's your point? You have been forbidden to mail anything to that address. why? don;t you like getting male |
Schlecks' Schlock!
On Feb 10, 12:18 pm, wrote:
On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 16:36:32 -0000, "DeanM" wrote: wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 4, 4:38 pm, "DeanM" wrote: I don't know, what's knew with you? BTW is this information still correct Brian Burke snip You've been reported. What..on TV, radio?? nothing to report there Burke everything is available in the public domain and readily available for all to see and post if so desired and yet you seem tothink other wise steve How does someone in 4-Land get a 5-Land vanity callsign? |
Schlecks' Schlock!
On Feb 10, 11:38 am, "Dean M" wrote:
why? don;t you like getting male "Getting male?" Are you a pervert? Suspicious US mail is opened by the postal inspector. Suspicious packages from other carriers get opened by the Sheriff. Harassing emails are both forwarded to the state attorney general, and printed and mailed to the attorney general. Your stalking is now documented. Proceed at your own risk. Best of Luck. |
Schlecks' Schlock!
On Feb 10, 12:16 pm, wrote:
On 10 Feb 2007 07:45:31 -0800, wrote: On Feb 4, 4:38 pm, "Dean M" wrote: BTW, Do you always interrupt people when they have conversations that don't involve you? From what I see: Brian Burke snip What's your point? harrassment The Robesin Syndrome pops up when you least expect it. |
Schlecks' Schlock!
wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 10, 11:38 am, "Dean M" wrote: why? don;t you like getting male "Getting male?" Are you a pervert? no, are you? you seem to always talk about someone being a prick. seems your infatuation with male parts rivals Marcus Suspicious US mail is opened by the postal inspector. seems logical Suspicious packages from other carriers get opened by the Sheriff. see,s logical Harassing emails are both forwarded to the state attorney general, and printed and mailed to the attorney general. seems logical Your stalking is now documented. Proceed at your own risk. Best of Luck. seems illogical. How does one stalk in a public forum? As to documentation try this Go to www.qrz.com type in N0IMD and this is what you get Brian P Burke 430 Longview St Pickerington OH 43147 USA now go to: http://www-p.switchboard.com/_1_2STR.../whitepage.htm type in Burke and Pickerington, OH this is what you get: Brian Burke (614) 833-0979 | 430 Longview St Pickerington, OH 43147 so, where's the stalking little marcus clone?? feel free to report this proceed at your own risk. maybe a twitch of an index finger, or was it an ounce of pressure. perhaps a 2 x 4 and then picking your teeth up off the floor. which is your perferred method there Brian Burke (614) 833-0979 | 430 Longview St Pickerington, OH 43147 Would love to continue this but your are sounding more like Marcus, the professional handicapped drafted military whatever he porfesses he is Ta Dean |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:39 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com